Pesticide operator safety: A global framework to support operator safety at the “local” level

Anugrah Shaw, Olivier Sanvido, Githaiga Wagate, Markus Röver
{"title":"Pesticide operator safety: A global framework to support operator safety at the “local” level","authors":"Anugrah Shaw, Olivier Sanvido, Githaiga Wagate, Markus Röver","doi":"10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pesticides are used in agriculture worldwide. Typically, approval of the products for specific uses is required. During the approval process, a risk assessment takes place that estimates risks to human health based on exposure to pesticides, in addition to environmental risks. This publication focuses mainly on requirements and options to reduce exposure risks for operators. Effective operator health and safety is considered to be based on four pillars: (1) risk assessment, (2) risk mitigation, (3) risk communication, and (4) information and training of farmers. Information on each of the four pillars addressed here includes (1) background Information, (2) example(s) for consideration, and (3) recommendation for process improvement. This article analyses and describes the basic assumptions and procedures as well as the inter-connectedness of actions that result in information communicated to the operators. It was identified that in many regions one or more of the pillars mentioned are not effective and could be improved. This includes considerations on exposure models available and under development, the definition of appropriate PPE as well as options and current developments in the field of risk communication including the identification of the relevant stakeholders. The major objective of the article is to initiate discussion on the framework that is required to improve each of the four pillars starting from a proper risk assessment considering realistic risk mitigation measures, followed by a clear and concise risk communication and finally the implementation of safety measures through proper information and training for the trainers and farmers.","PeriodicalId":39273,"journal":{"name":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Pesticides are used in agriculture worldwide. Typically, approval of the products for specific uses is required. During the approval process, a risk assessment takes place that estimates risks to human health based on exposure to pesticides, in addition to environmental risks. This publication focuses mainly on requirements and options to reduce exposure risks for operators. Effective operator health and safety is considered to be based on four pillars: (1) risk assessment, (2) risk mitigation, (3) risk communication, and (4) information and training of farmers. Information on each of the four pillars addressed here includes (1) background Information, (2) example(s) for consideration, and (3) recommendation for process improvement. This article analyses and describes the basic assumptions and procedures as well as the inter-connectedness of actions that result in information communicated to the operators. It was identified that in many regions one or more of the pillars mentioned are not effective and could be improved. This includes considerations on exposure models available and under development, the definition of appropriate PPE as well as options and current developments in the field of risk communication including the identification of the relevant stakeholders. The major objective of the article is to initiate discussion on the framework that is required to improve each of the four pillars starting from a proper risk assessment considering realistic risk mitigation measures, followed by a clear and concise risk communication and finally the implementation of safety measures through proper information and training for the trainers and farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农药操作人员安全:在“地方”层面支持操作人员安全的全球框架
农药在世界范围内广泛应用于农业生产。通常情况下,需要对特定用途的产品进行批准。在批准过程中,除了环境风险外,还要进行风险评估,根据农药接触情况估计人类健康面临的风险。本出版物主要侧重于降低操作人员暴露风险的要求和选择。有效的操作人员健康和安全被认为基于四个支柱:(1)风险评估,(2)风险缓解,(3)风险沟通,以及(4)农民的信息和培训。这里讨论的四个支柱中的每一个支柱的信息包括(1)背景信息,(2)要考虑的示例,以及(3)过程改进建议。本文分析和描述了基本的假设和程序,以及导致信息传达给操作员的行动的相互联系。会议指出,在许多区域,上述一个或多个支柱是无效的,可以加以改进。这包括考虑现有的和正在开发的暴露模型,适当个人防护装备的定义以及风险通报领域的选择和当前发展,包括确定相关利益攸关方。本文的主要目标是开始讨论改进四个支柱所需的框架,从考虑现实的风险缓解措施的适当风险评估开始,然后是清晰和简明的风险沟通,最后通过对培训人员和农民的适当信息和培训实施安全措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources
CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Agricultural impacts of climate change in India and potential adaptations Rights-based approaches and Indigenous peoples and local communities: Findings from a literature review A narrative review of current perspectives on urinary tract infections in dogs and cats Porcine circoviruses in Malaysia Improvement in operator safety for low- and middle-income countries: A user-friendly, consistent risk assessment and mitigation process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1