The diffusion process of product-harm misinformation on social media: evidence from consumers and insights from communication professionals

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Internet Research Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0571
Zifei Fay Chen, Yang Cheng
{"title":"The diffusion process of product-harm misinformation on social media: evidence from consumers and insights from communication professionals","authors":"Zifei Fay Chen, Yang Cheng","doi":"10.1108/intr-07-2022-0571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to propose a model that delineated the diffusion process of product-harm misinformation on social media. Drawing on theoretical insights from cue diagnosticity and corporate associations, the proposed model mapped out how consumers' information skepticism and perceived content credibility influence their perceived diagnosticity of the product-harm misinformation and corporate ability (CA) associations with the company being impacted, which in turn influenced their trust toward the company and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) intention. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted with 504 US consumers to empirically test the proposed model. Following the survey, in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 communication professionals regarding the applicability of the model. Findings When exposed to product-harm misinformation on social media, consumers' perceived diagnosticity of misinformation was negatively impacted by their information skepticism and positively impacted by perceived content credibility of misinformation. Perceived diagnosticity of product-harm misinformation negatively impacted consumers' CA associations, which then led to decreased trust and increased NWOM intention. Findings from the interviews further supported the diffusion process and provided insights on strategies to combat product-harm misinformation. Strategies shared by the interviewees included preparedness and social listening, proactive outreach and building strong CA associations as preventative measures. Originality/value This study incorporates the theoretical frameworks of cue diagnosticity and corporate associations into the scholarship of misinformation and specifically addresses the unique diffusion process of product-harm misinformation on social media. This study provides insights and tangible recommendations for communication professionals to combat product-harm misinformation.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-07-2022-0571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to propose a model that delineated the diffusion process of product-harm misinformation on social media. Drawing on theoretical insights from cue diagnosticity and corporate associations, the proposed model mapped out how consumers' information skepticism and perceived content credibility influence their perceived diagnosticity of the product-harm misinformation and corporate ability (CA) associations with the company being impacted, which in turn influenced their trust toward the company and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) intention. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted with 504 US consumers to empirically test the proposed model. Following the survey, in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 communication professionals regarding the applicability of the model. Findings When exposed to product-harm misinformation on social media, consumers' perceived diagnosticity of misinformation was negatively impacted by their information skepticism and positively impacted by perceived content credibility of misinformation. Perceived diagnosticity of product-harm misinformation negatively impacted consumers' CA associations, which then led to decreased trust and increased NWOM intention. Findings from the interviews further supported the diffusion process and provided insights on strategies to combat product-harm misinformation. Strategies shared by the interviewees included preparedness and social listening, proactive outreach and building strong CA associations as preventative measures. Originality/value This study incorporates the theoretical frameworks of cue diagnosticity and corporate associations into the scholarship of misinformation and specifically addresses the unique diffusion process of product-harm misinformation on social media. This study provides insights and tangible recommendations for communication professionals to combat product-harm misinformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体上产品危害错误信息的传播过程:来自消费者的证据和传播专业人士的见解
本研究旨在建立一个描述社交媒体上产品危害错误信息传播过程的模型。利用线索诊断性和企业关联的理论见解,该模型描绘了消费者的信息怀疑主义和感知内容可信度如何影响他们对产品损害错误信息的感知诊断性和与受影响公司的企业能力(CA)关联,进而影响他们对公司的信任和负面口碑(NWOM)意愿。设计/方法/方法对504名美国消费者进行了调查,以实证检验所提出的模型。调查结束后,我们对11位传播专业人士就模型的适用性进行了深入访谈。当消费者接触到社交媒体上的产品危害错误信息时,他们对错误信息的感知诊断性受到信息怀疑主义的负面影响,并受到错误信息内容可信度的积极影响。感知产品危害错误信息的诊断性对消费者的CA关联产生负面影响,从而导致信任降低和NWOM意愿增加。访谈的结果进一步支持了传播过程,并为打击产品危害错误信息的战略提供了见解。受访者分享的策略包括准备和社会倾听、积极的外联和建立强大的CA协会作为预防措施。原创性/价值本研究将线索诊断和企业关联的理论框架纳入错误信息研究,并专门研究了社交媒体上产品伤害错误信息的独特传播过程。本研究为通信专业人员提供了打击产品危害错误信息的见解和切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Research
Internet Research 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This wide-ranging interdisciplinary journal looks at the social, ethical, economic and political implications of the internet. Recent issues have focused on online and mobile gaming, the sharing economy, and the dark side of social media.
期刊最新文献
Does social presence drive customer brand engagement and purchase intention in the fashion retail metaverse? The moderating role of self-efficacy Can digital transformation alleviate corporate fraud? Evidence from China Gameful systems for corporate sustainability: systematic review, conceptual framework and research agenda on gamification and sustainable employee behavior in companies Why do people customize avatars in the metaverse? Curiosity and SOR model perspective “I am sorry for judging you”: conceptualizing sentiment reversal among followers in case of falsely alleged social media influencer transgression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1