A critical review of cost-benefit analysis for business software investments

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS American Journal of Business Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.1108/ajb-09-2022-0145
Sachidanandam Sakthivel
{"title":"A critical review of cost-benefit analysis for business software investments","authors":"Sachidanandam Sakthivel","doi":"10.1108/ajb-09-2022-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Cost-benefit (C/B) analysis helps to determine the economic feasibility of business software investments. Research literature and published practices do not recognize substantial software maintenance costs in C/B analysis. Current analyses emphasize the benefits of an initial investment but do not consider the recurring benefits of each enhancement during the software lifecycle. Such analyses could lead to incorrect investment decisions and lost business opportunities. This article aims to review current research on software lifecycle costs and develop a theoretically sound C/B analysis. Design/methodology/approach This article reviews current C/B analyses and discusses their shortcomings in treating the significant recurring maintenance costs. It analyzes the findings of various studies on software maintenance and synthesizes these findings to identify the nature of various maintenance costs and their benefits. Based on the synthesis, it theorizes various cost and benefit elements for inclusion in a revised C/B analysis. Findings This article identifies each recurring maintenance cost relevant to C/B analysis. It also identifies recurring benefits from each enhancement that hitherto have been omitted. Finally, this article discusses how these costs and benefits should be treated in the revised C/Bs analysis. Research limitations/implications This is a conceptual paper proposing a new C/B analysis and requires an empirical validation. Practical implications This article provides a revision of the C/B analysis that is long overdue. It will help to justify a software investment correctly, rank software projects that compete for limited funds and help create a sound software project portfolio. Since 20% of software products may incur 80% of software investment, this analysis will help to make correct software investments and avoid lost business opportunities. This article also describes a practical method to use the revised C/B analysis. Originality/value This article provides a revision of the C/B analysis that is long overdue. It will help to justify a software investment correctly, rank software projects that compete for limited funds and help create a sound software project portfolio. Since 20% of software products may incur 80% of software investment, this analysis will help to make correct software investments and avoid lost business opportunities. This article also describes a practical method to use the revised C/B analysis.","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-09-2022-0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Cost-benefit (C/B) analysis helps to determine the economic feasibility of business software investments. Research literature and published practices do not recognize substantial software maintenance costs in C/B analysis. Current analyses emphasize the benefits of an initial investment but do not consider the recurring benefits of each enhancement during the software lifecycle. Such analyses could lead to incorrect investment decisions and lost business opportunities. This article aims to review current research on software lifecycle costs and develop a theoretically sound C/B analysis. Design/methodology/approach This article reviews current C/B analyses and discusses their shortcomings in treating the significant recurring maintenance costs. It analyzes the findings of various studies on software maintenance and synthesizes these findings to identify the nature of various maintenance costs and their benefits. Based on the synthesis, it theorizes various cost and benefit elements for inclusion in a revised C/B analysis. Findings This article identifies each recurring maintenance cost relevant to C/B analysis. It also identifies recurring benefits from each enhancement that hitherto have been omitted. Finally, this article discusses how these costs and benefits should be treated in the revised C/Bs analysis. Research limitations/implications This is a conceptual paper proposing a new C/B analysis and requires an empirical validation. Practical implications This article provides a revision of the C/B analysis that is long overdue. It will help to justify a software investment correctly, rank software projects that compete for limited funds and help create a sound software project portfolio. Since 20% of software products may incur 80% of software investment, this analysis will help to make correct software investments and avoid lost business opportunities. This article also describes a practical method to use the revised C/B analysis. Originality/value This article provides a revision of the C/B analysis that is long overdue. It will help to justify a software investment correctly, rank software projects that compete for limited funds and help create a sound software project portfolio. Since 20% of software products may incur 80% of software investment, this analysis will help to make correct software investments and avoid lost business opportunities. This article also describes a practical method to use the revised C/B analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对商业软件投资的成本效益分析的批判性回顾
目的成本效益(C/B)分析有助于确定商业软件投资的经济可行性。研究文献和已发表的实践并没有在C/B分析中认识到大量的软件维护成本。当前的分析强调了初始投资的收益,但没有考虑在软件生命周期中每次增强的重复收益。这样的分析可能会导致错误的投资决策和失去商业机会。本文旨在回顾当前关于软件生命周期成本的研究,并开发理论上合理的C/B分析。本文回顾了当前的C/B分析,并讨论了它们在处理重要的经常性维护成本方面的缺点。它分析了关于软件维护的各种研究结果,并综合了这些研究结果,以确定各种维护成本的性质及其收益。在综合的基础上,它将各种成本和效益因素理论化,以纳入修订后的C/B分析。本文确定了与C/B分析相关的每个经常性维护成本。它还指出了迄今为止被忽略的每次增强的重复好处。最后,本文讨论了在修订后的C/ b分析中应该如何处理这些成本和收益。这是一篇提出新的C/B分析的概念性论文,需要实证验证。这篇文章提供了对C/B分析的修订,这是姗姗来迟的。它将有助于正确地证明软件投资的合理性,对竞争有限资金的软件项目进行排序,并帮助创建一个健全的软件项目组合。由于20%的软件产品可能招致80%的软件投资,这种分析将有助于做出正确的软件投资,避免失去商业机会。本文还描述了一种使用修改后的C/B分析的实用方法。这篇文章对C/B分析进行了修订,这是人们期待已久的。它将有助于正确地证明软件投资的合理性,对竞争有限资金的软件项目进行排序,并帮助创建一个健全的软件项目组合。由于20%的软件产品可能招致80%的软件投资,这种分析将有助于做出正确的软件投资,避免失去商业机会。本文还描述了一种使用修改后的C/B分析的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Deep pockets or empty coffers? Functional expenses, contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to pivot during COVID-19 CEO political ideology and credit risk assessment Investor attention during soccer World Cups Entrepreneurial Resilience in the Micro and Small Business Context – Systematic Literature Review A Practical Guide to Writing Performance Appraisals and Letters of Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1