Deep pockets or empty coffers? Functional expenses, contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to pivot during COVID-19

IF 1.1 Q4 BUSINESS American Journal of Business Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1108/ajb-07-2023-0117
Cari Burke-Kolehmainen, Melissa Intindola
{"title":"Deep pockets or empty coffers? Functional expenses, contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to pivot during COVID-19","authors":"Cari Burke-Kolehmainen, Melissa Intindola","doi":"10.1108/ajb-07-2023-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWithin the context of the nonprofit resiliency framework, the authors use nonprofit functional expenses and contribution revenue to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the ability of nonprofits in different subsectors to carry out their mission, as well as their ability to “pivot” fundraising strategies to integrate social media and digital engagement.Design/methodology/approach The authors use IRS form 990 return data for organizations with a year-end return that includes at least six months of COVID-19 impact (“Wave 1 Effects” period) and also have a prior-year return (“Business as Usual” period). The authors use Wilcoxon signed rank tests to examine whether there are differences in our variables of interest between the two periods.FindingsWhile the majority of nonprofits in most subsectors experienced a significant decrease in program spending, fundraising spending and fundraising efficiency ratios between the two time periods, the authors found variation in the change in contribution revenue and fundraising ratio between the two periods between subsectors. The authors also find that the percentage of nonprofits able to “pivot” their fundraising strategies varies by subsector between 13.33 and 31.23%.Originality/valueThis paper provides new information regarding the pandemic's initial effect on nonprofit program and fundraising spending, the related contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to “pivot” fundraising to remote strategies. The authors propose a more robust fundraising efficiency measure and a new measure indicating a nonprofit's “ability to pivot” their fundraising strategy. The authors encourage future researchers to conduct further longitudinal studies to understand how these effects may continue or change.","PeriodicalId":44116,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-07-2023-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeWithin the context of the nonprofit resiliency framework, the authors use nonprofit functional expenses and contribution revenue to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the ability of nonprofits in different subsectors to carry out their mission, as well as their ability to “pivot” fundraising strategies to integrate social media and digital engagement.Design/methodology/approach The authors use IRS form 990 return data for organizations with a year-end return that includes at least six months of COVID-19 impact (“Wave 1 Effects” period) and also have a prior-year return (“Business as Usual” period). The authors use Wilcoxon signed rank tests to examine whether there are differences in our variables of interest between the two periods.FindingsWhile the majority of nonprofits in most subsectors experienced a significant decrease in program spending, fundraising spending and fundraising efficiency ratios between the two time periods, the authors found variation in the change in contribution revenue and fundraising ratio between the two periods between subsectors. The authors also find that the percentage of nonprofits able to “pivot” their fundraising strategies varies by subsector between 13.33 and 31.23%.Originality/valueThis paper provides new information regarding the pandemic's initial effect on nonprofit program and fundraising spending, the related contribution revenue and the ability of nonprofits to “pivot” fundraising to remote strategies. The authors propose a more robust fundraising efficiency measure and a new measure indicating a nonprofit's “ability to pivot” their fundraising strategy. The authors encourage future researchers to conduct further longitudinal studies to understand how these effects may continue or change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰缠万贯还是囊空如洗?功能性支出、捐款收入和非营利组织在 COVID-19 期间的转折能力
在非营利组织弹性框架的背景下,作者使用非营利组织的功能费用和捐款收入来探索COVID-19大流行如何影响不同子行业的非营利组织执行其使命的能力,以及他们“支点”筹款策略以整合社交媒体和数字参与的能力。设计/方法/方法作者使用美国国税局990表格回报数据,这些组织的年终回报包括至少六个月的COVID-19影响(“第一波影响”时期),也有上一年的回报(“一切照旧”时期)。作者使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来检查两个时期之间我们感兴趣的变量是否存在差异。研究发现:虽然在两个时间段内,大多数子行业的非营利组织在项目支出、筹款支出和筹款效率方面都出现了显著下降,但作者发现,在两个时间段内,子行业之间的捐款收入和筹款比率的变化存在差异。作者还发现,能够“调整”筹款策略的非营利组织的比例因行业而异,在13.33%到31.23%之间。原创性/价值本文提供了关于疫情对非营利项目和筹款支出的初步影响、相关捐款收入以及非营利组织将筹款“转向”远程战略的能力的新信息。作者提出了一个更稳健的筹款效率衡量标准和一个新的衡量标准,表明非营利组织的“转向能力”他们的筹款策略。作者鼓励未来的研究人员进行进一步的纵向研究,以了解这些影响如何持续或变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊最新文献
Employee-customer identification and service quality in the hospitality industry Implementing organizational ambidexterity using the balanced scorecard in Puebla City’s hotel industry, Mexico Examining the impact of consumers’ showrooming behavior on sales staff job conditions: insights from the Indian apparel retail sector Revisiting the evaluation of IT ethical scenarios using a multidimensional scale Impact of ownership concentration on stock returns: a case of developed economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1