Axial tension/compression and torsional loading of diamond and gyroid lattice structures for biomedical implants: Simulation and experiment

Anatolie Timercan, Patrick Terriault, Vladimir Brailovski
{"title":"Axial tension/compression and torsional loading of diamond and gyroid lattice structures for biomedical implants: Simulation and experiment","authors":"Anatolie Timercan, Patrick Terriault, Vladimir Brailovski","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lattice structures are increasingly used in biomedical implants, notably intervertebral cages, requiring a better understanding of their behavior for the different types of loading they undergo during application. Strut-based diamond and sheet-based gyroid structures with porosity levels ranging from 50 to 80 % and an identical pore size of 750 μm were manufactured from Ti6Al4V alloy, tested experimentally and simulated numerically in axial tension/compression and in torsion to simulate flexion/extension, compression and rotation of the human spine. The manufactured structures were within 5 % of the targeted porosity. However, numerical simulations overestimated the experimental apparent (effective) stiffness and strength of the structures by an average of 25 %, likely due to the presence in them of manufacturing defects, especially in the higher porosity lattices. Experimental and numerical results showed that the structures have quasi-identical mechanical properties in compression and in tension. However, a comparison of the torsion and axial results indicated that conventional bulk material failure theories such as the von Mises limitation criterion do not apply to the apparent properties of lattice structures. Studied lattices exhibited adequate resistance for use in intervertebral cages, however their stiffness was greater than those of the vertebrae, while situated in the stiffness range of cortical bone.","PeriodicalId":101318,"journal":{"name":"MATERIALS & DESIGN","volume":"230 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATERIALS & DESIGN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Lattice structures are increasingly used in biomedical implants, notably intervertebral cages, requiring a better understanding of their behavior for the different types of loading they undergo during application. Strut-based diamond and sheet-based gyroid structures with porosity levels ranging from 50 to 80 % and an identical pore size of 750 μm were manufactured from Ti6Al4V alloy, tested experimentally and simulated numerically in axial tension/compression and in torsion to simulate flexion/extension, compression and rotation of the human spine. The manufactured structures were within 5 % of the targeted porosity. However, numerical simulations overestimated the experimental apparent (effective) stiffness and strength of the structures by an average of 25 %, likely due to the presence in them of manufacturing defects, especially in the higher porosity lattices. Experimental and numerical results showed that the structures have quasi-identical mechanical properties in compression and in tension. However, a comparison of the torsion and axial results indicated that conventional bulk material failure theories such as the von Mises limitation criterion do not apply to the apparent properties of lattice structures. Studied lattices exhibited adequate resistance for use in intervertebral cages, however their stiffness was greater than those of the vertebrae, while situated in the stiffness range of cortical bone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于生物医学植入物的金刚石和陀螺晶格结构的轴向拉伸/压缩和扭转载荷:模拟和实验
晶格结构越来越多地用于生物医学植入物,特别是椎间笼,需要更好地了解其在应用过程中所承受的不同类型载荷的行为。以Ti6Al4V合金为材料,制备了孔隙度为50% ~ 80%、孔径为750 μm的基于支柱的金刚石和基于片状的旋转结构,并进行了轴向拉伸/压缩和扭转的实验和数值模拟,模拟了人体脊柱的弯曲/伸展、压缩和旋转。制造的结构在目标孔隙率的5%以内。然而,数值模拟将结构的实验表观(有效)刚度和强度平均高估了25%,这可能是由于其中存在制造缺陷,特别是在高孔隙率晶格中。实验和数值结果表明,该结构在压缩和拉伸条件下具有近似相同的力学性能。然而,扭转和轴向结果的比较表明,传统的块体材料破坏理论,如von Mises极限准则,并不适用于晶格结构的表观特性。所研究的晶格显示出足够的阻力用于椎间笼,但是它们的刚度大于椎骨,而位于皮质骨的刚度范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Materials and Design is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes original research reports, review articles, and express communications. It covers a wide range of topics including the structure and properties of inorganic and organic materials, advancements in synthesis, processing, characterization, and testing, as well as the design of materials and engineering systems, and their applications in technology. The journal aims to integrate various disciplines such as materials science, engineering, physics, and chemistry. By exploring themes from materials to design, it seeks to uncover connections between natural and artificial materials, and between experimental findings and theoretical models. Manuscripts submitted to Materials and Design are expected to offer elements of discovery and surprise, contributing to new insights into the architecture and function of matter.
期刊最新文献
Programmable and multistable metamaterials made of precisely tailored bistable cells Direct 3D microprinting of highly conductive gold structures via localized electrodeposition Understanding the breakup behaviors of liquid jet in gas atomization for powder production Precision control of oxygen content in CP-Ti for ultra-high strength through titanium oxide decomposition: An in-situ study The role of yttrium micro-alloying on microstructure evolution and high-temperature mechanical properties of additively manufactured Inconel 718
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1