Building Autonomous Power: Solidarity Networks in Precarious Times

IF 1.3 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Global Labour Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.15173/glj.v14i3.5328
Benjamin Anderson, John Jenkinson
{"title":"Building Autonomous Power: Solidarity Networks in Precarious Times","authors":"Benjamin Anderson, John Jenkinson","doi":"10.15173/glj.v14i3.5328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From COVID-19 to the so-called labour shortage of late 2021, the past three years have revealed a renewed discourse on labour markets and working conditions. Alongside this discourse, workers in a variety of industries have been organising to fight the rollbacks, redundancies and concessions imposed in response to the pandemic and its related financial crisis. From Amazon warehouse workers to hospitality workers to informally employed platform workers, the global precarious are rising up. In addition to traditional labour movement tactics, one tool that has proven powerful and flexible in the COVID period is the autonomous solidarity network. Built from the model of the worker centre, a labour solidarity network is conceived of as a decentralised grouping of workers, organisers and allies, usually operated virtually and at arms-length from formal union structures. Following the methodological foundation of workers’ inquiry and using the tools of strategic labour research and participatory action research, this article reports on interviews with workers and organisers involved with worker centres and solidarity networks, distilling their experiences and observations into a set of common practices that characterise worker organising efforts taking place in a number of Canadian workplaces, including hospitality, migrant work programs, platform services and artisanal industries. In addition to traditional labour movement tactics, one tool that has proven powerful and flexible in the COVID period is the autonomous solidarity network. Built from the model of the worker centre, a labour solidarity network is conceived of as a decentralized grouping of workers, organizers and allies, usually operated virtually and at arms-length from formal union structures. Following the methodological foundation of workers’ inquiry, this article reports on interviews with workers and organizers involved with worker centres and solidarity networks, distilling their experiences and observations into a set of common practices that characterize worker organizing efforts taking place in a number of Canadian workplaces, including hospitality, migrant work programs, platform services, and artisanal industries.","PeriodicalId":44737,"journal":{"name":"Global Labour Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Labour Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v14i3.5328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From COVID-19 to the so-called labour shortage of late 2021, the past three years have revealed a renewed discourse on labour markets and working conditions. Alongside this discourse, workers in a variety of industries have been organising to fight the rollbacks, redundancies and concessions imposed in response to the pandemic and its related financial crisis. From Amazon warehouse workers to hospitality workers to informally employed platform workers, the global precarious are rising up. In addition to traditional labour movement tactics, one tool that has proven powerful and flexible in the COVID period is the autonomous solidarity network. Built from the model of the worker centre, a labour solidarity network is conceived of as a decentralised grouping of workers, organisers and allies, usually operated virtually and at arms-length from formal union structures. Following the methodological foundation of workers’ inquiry and using the tools of strategic labour research and participatory action research, this article reports on interviews with workers and organisers involved with worker centres and solidarity networks, distilling their experiences and observations into a set of common practices that characterise worker organising efforts taking place in a number of Canadian workplaces, including hospitality, migrant work programs, platform services and artisanal industries. In addition to traditional labour movement tactics, one tool that has proven powerful and flexible in the COVID period is the autonomous solidarity network. Built from the model of the worker centre, a labour solidarity network is conceived of as a decentralized grouping of workers, organizers and allies, usually operated virtually and at arms-length from formal union structures. Following the methodological foundation of workers’ inquiry, this article reports on interviews with workers and organizers involved with worker centres and solidarity networks, distilling their experiences and observations into a set of common practices that characterize worker organizing efforts taking place in a number of Canadian workplaces, including hospitality, migrant work programs, platform services, and artisanal industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立自主力量:不稳定时代的团结网络
从2019冠状病毒病到2021年底所谓的劳动力短缺,过去三年来,人们对劳动力市场和工作条件的讨论重新开始。与此同时,各行各业的工人一直在组织起来,反对为应对疫情及其相关的金融危机而实施的裁员、裁员和让步。从亚马逊仓库工人到酒店工人,再到非正式雇佣的平台工人,全球不稳定的人数正在上升。除了传统的工人运动策略外,在COVID期间被证明强大而灵活的一个工具是自治团结网络。建立在工人中心模型之上的劳工团结网络被认为是工人、组织者和盟友的分散组织,通常以虚拟方式运作,与正式的工会结构保持一定距离。根据工人调查的方法论基础,并使用战略劳工研究和参与性行动研究的工具,本文报告了对工人和参与工人中心和团结网络的组织者的采访,将他们的经验和观察提炼成一套常见做法,这些做法是在加拿大一些工作场所进行的工人组织工作的特点,包括接待、移民工作方案、平台服务和手工产业。除了传统的工人运动策略外,在COVID期间被证明强大而灵活的一个工具是自治团结网络。劳工团结网络建立在工人中心的模式之上,被认为是工人、组织者和盟友的分散组织,通常以虚拟方式运作,与正式的工会结构保持一定距离。根据工人调查的方法论基础,本文报道了对工人和参与工人中心和团结网络的组织者的采访,将他们的经验和观察提炼成一套常见的做法,这些做法体现了在加拿大一些工作场所发生的工人组织工作的特点,包括酒店、移民工作计划、平台服务和手工工业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Labour Journal
Global Labour Journal INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of Supriya RoyChowdhury (2021) City of Shadows: Slums and Informal Work in Bangalore Racial Capitalism and Global Labour Studies – a Missed Encounter ? Precarious Associational Power Editorial: Going Against the Grain: Our Commitment to Truly Global Labour Studies Pandemic Necrolabour and Essential Workers in the UK and France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1