Comparative assessment of effect of two methods of spinal anesthesia on central hemodynamic parameters in elderly and senile patients in emergency vascular surgery

M. I. Neimark, A. A. Burenkin, N. G. Khorev, M. G. Nikolaev
{"title":"Comparative assessment of effect of two methods of spinal anesthesia on central hemodynamic parameters in elderly and senile patients in emergency vascular surgery","authors":"M. I. Neimark, A. A. Burenkin, N. G. Khorev, M. G. Nikolaev","doi":"10.33667/2078-5631-2023-25-44-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To improve the results of treatment of comorbid patients with acute arterial ischemia by substantiating the optimal type of spinal anesthesia for surgical intervention on the affected limb.Materials and methods. The study involved 70 patients who were treated in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Clinical Hospital of ‘Russian Railways-Medicine Co.’ in Barnaul. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients operated under conditions of bilateral (bilateral) spinal anesthesia, group 2 – patients operated under conditions of monolateral (unilateral) spinal anesthesia. All patients underwent an assessment of the level of spinal block on the Bromage scale, monitoring of central hemodynamics using a MARG-10–01 rheograph, postoperative assessment of myocardial ischemia on the ECG, acute kidney damage to control diuresis.Results. In the 2nd group, there was a sufficient sensory and motor block to perform surgery. In the intraoperative period in the group of patients who underwent unilateral blockade, the mean arterial pressure decreased by 3 mm Hg. In this regard, there was no clinically significant increase in heart rate and a decrease in the stroke index and the index of total peripheral vascular resistance. In the 1st group, the decrease in mean arterial pressure reached 20% of the original, which led to an increase in heart rate by 12% and a decrease in stroke index by 11%.Conclusions. During the perioperative period, the indicators of central hemodynamics in the group 2 were more stable compared to the group 1, they did not need the use of vasopressor drugs and crystalloids. And in the early postoperative period, patients who underwent unilateral anesthesia did not show signs of acute kidney injury. Monolateral spinal anesthesia, compared with conventional spinal anesthesia, provides more stable hemodynamics in elderly patients with acute arterial ischemia.","PeriodicalId":499576,"journal":{"name":"Medicinskij alfavit","volume":"1 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinskij alfavit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-25-44-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To improve the results of treatment of comorbid patients with acute arterial ischemia by substantiating the optimal type of spinal anesthesia for surgical intervention on the affected limb.Materials and methods. The study involved 70 patients who were treated in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Clinical Hospital of ‘Russian Railways-Medicine Co.’ in Barnaul. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – patients operated under conditions of bilateral (bilateral) spinal anesthesia, group 2 – patients operated under conditions of monolateral (unilateral) spinal anesthesia. All patients underwent an assessment of the level of spinal block on the Bromage scale, monitoring of central hemodynamics using a MARG-10–01 rheograph, postoperative assessment of myocardial ischemia on the ECG, acute kidney damage to control diuresis.Results. In the 2nd group, there was a sufficient sensory and motor block to perform surgery. In the intraoperative period in the group of patients who underwent unilateral blockade, the mean arterial pressure decreased by 3 mm Hg. In this regard, there was no clinically significant increase in heart rate and a decrease in the stroke index and the index of total peripheral vascular resistance. In the 1st group, the decrease in mean arterial pressure reached 20% of the original, which led to an increase in heart rate by 12% and a decrease in stroke index by 11%.Conclusions. During the perioperative period, the indicators of central hemodynamics in the group 2 were more stable compared to the group 1, they did not need the use of vasopressor drugs and crystalloids. And in the early postoperative period, patients who underwent unilateral anesthesia did not show signs of acute kidney injury. Monolateral spinal anesthesia, compared with conventional spinal anesthesia, provides more stable hemodynamics in elderly patients with acute arterial ischemia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种脊髓麻醉方法对中老年急诊血管手术患者中心血流动力学参数影响的比较评价
目标。为提高急性动脉缺血合并症患者的治疗效果,确定患肢手术干预的最佳脊髓麻醉类型。材料和方法。这项研究涉及70名在巴尔瑙尔“俄罗斯铁路医药公司”临床医院血管外科接受治疗的患者。患者分为两组:组1为双侧(双侧)脊髓麻醉,组2为单侧(单侧)脊髓麻醉。所有患者均接受Bromage评分评估脊髓阻滞水平,使用MARG-10-01流变仪监测中央血流动力学,术后心电图评估心肌缺血,急性肾损伤以控制利尿。在第二组中,有足够的感觉和运动障碍进行手术。单侧阻断组患者术中平均动脉压下降3 mm Hg,心率无明显升高,卒中指数和外周血管总阻力指数均无明显下降。第一组患者平均动脉压降低20%,心率提高12%,卒中指数降低11%。围手术期,2组中央血流动力学指标较1组稳定,不需要使用升压药物和晶体类药物。术后早期,单侧麻醉患者未出现急性肾损伤的迹象。与常规脊髓麻醉相比,单侧脊髓麻醉可为老年急性动脉缺血患者提供更稳定的血流动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative assessment of effect of two methods of spinal anesthesia on central hemodynamic parameters in elderly and senile patients in emergency vascular surgery Positive effects of methylprednisolone continuous infusion in treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 associated bacterial pneumonia Infusion therapy in critical patients (state of problem). Part 1 Chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic heart failure infected with human immunodeficiency virus Case report of ultrasound-assisted nerve blockade of fascial plane by erector spine block in acute pancreatitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1