In a PICKLE: A gold standard entity and relation corpus for the molecular plant sciences

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY in silico Plants Pub Date : 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1093/insilicoplants/diad021
Serena Lotreck, Kenia Segura Abá, Melissa Lehti-Shiu, Abigail Seeger, Brianna N I Brown, Thilanka Ranaweera, Ally Schumacher, Mohammad Ghassemi, Shin-Han Shiu
{"title":"In a PICKLE: A gold standard entity and relation corpus for the molecular plant sciences","authors":"Serena Lotreck, Kenia Segura Abá, Melissa Lehti-Shiu, Abigail Seeger, Brianna N I Brown, Thilanka Ranaweera, Ally Schumacher, Mohammad Ghassemi, Shin-Han Shiu","doi":"10.1093/insilicoplants/diad021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Natural language processing (NLP) techniques can enhance our ability to interpret plant science literature. Many state-of-the-art algorithms for NLP tasks require high-quality labeled data in the target domain, in which entities like genes and proteins, as well as the relationships between entities are labeled according to a set of annotation guidelines. While there exist such datasets for other domains, these resources need development in the plant sciences. Here, we present the Plant ScIenCe KnowLedgE Graph (PICKLE) corpus, a collection of 250 plant science abstracts annotated with entities and relations, along with its annotation guidelines. The annotation guidelines were refined by iterative rounds of overlapping annotations, in which inter-annotator agreement was leveraged to improve the guidelines. To demonstrate PICKLE’s utility, we evaluated the performance of pretrained models from other domains and trained a new, PICKLE-based model for entity and relation extraction. The PICKLE-trained models exhibit the second-highest in-domain entity performance of all models evaluated, as well as a relation extraction performance that is on par with other models. Additionally, we found that computer science-domain models outperformed models trained on a biomedical corpus (GENIA) in entity extraction, which was unexpected given the intuition that biomedical literature is more similar to PICKLE than computer science. Upon further exploration, we established that the inclusion of new types on which the models were not trained substantially impacts performance. The PICKLE corpus is therefore an important contribution to training resources for entity and relation extraction in the plant sciences.","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":"6 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/insilicoplants/diad021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Natural language processing (NLP) techniques can enhance our ability to interpret plant science literature. Many state-of-the-art algorithms for NLP tasks require high-quality labeled data in the target domain, in which entities like genes and proteins, as well as the relationships between entities are labeled according to a set of annotation guidelines. While there exist such datasets for other domains, these resources need development in the plant sciences. Here, we present the Plant ScIenCe KnowLedgE Graph (PICKLE) corpus, a collection of 250 plant science abstracts annotated with entities and relations, along with its annotation guidelines. The annotation guidelines were refined by iterative rounds of overlapping annotations, in which inter-annotator agreement was leveraged to improve the guidelines. To demonstrate PICKLE’s utility, we evaluated the performance of pretrained models from other domains and trained a new, PICKLE-based model for entity and relation extraction. The PICKLE-trained models exhibit the second-highest in-domain entity performance of all models evaluated, as well as a relation extraction performance that is on par with other models. Additionally, we found that computer science-domain models outperformed models trained on a biomedical corpus (GENIA) in entity extraction, which was unexpected given the intuition that biomedical literature is more similar to PICKLE than computer science. Upon further exploration, we established that the inclusion of new types on which the models were not trained substantially impacts performance. The PICKLE corpus is therefore an important contribution to training resources for entity and relation extraction in the plant sciences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在困境中:分子植物科学的金标准实体和关系语料库
自然语言处理(NLP)技术可以提高我们对植物科学文献的解释能力。许多用于NLP任务的最先进算法需要目标域中的高质量标记数据,其中基因和蛋白质等实体以及实体之间的关系根据一组注释指南进行标记。虽然存在其他领域的此类数据集,但这些资源需要在植物科学中开发。在这里,我们展示了植物科学知识图谱(PICKLE)语料库,这是250篇植物科学摘要的集合,带有实体和关系的注释,以及注释指南。注释指导方针通过重复的注释轮来改进,其中利用了注释者之间的协议来改进指导方针。为了证明PICKLE的实用性,我们评估了来自其他领域的预训练模型的性能,并训练了一个新的基于PICKLE的实体和关系提取模型。pickle训练的模型在所有评估的模型中表现出第二高的域内实体性能,以及与其他模型相当的关系提取性能。此外,我们发现计算机科学领域模型在实体提取方面优于生物医学语料库(GENIA)上训练的模型,这是出乎意料的,因为直觉认为生物医学文献比计算机科学更类似于PICKLE。经过进一步的探索,我们确定了包含未对模型进行训练的新类型会对性能产生实质性影响。因此,PICKLE语料库对植物科学中实体和关系提取的培训资源做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Playing a crop simulation model using symbols and sounds: the ‘mandala’ A Scalable Pipeline to Create Synthetic Datasets from Functional-Structural Plant Models for Deep Learning In a PICKLE: A gold standard entity and relation corpus for the molecular plant sciences A comparison of empirical and mechanistic models for wheat yield prediction at field level in Moroccan rainfed areas Informative community structure revealed using Arabidopsis time series transcriptome data via Partitioned Local Depth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1