Psychological impact of COVID-19 on university students in Oman: an examination of stress, resilience and meaning in life

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Education Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1108/he-05-2023-0061
Moon Fai Chan, Tamadhir Al-Mahrouqi, Salim Al-Huseini, Maryam Al-Mukhaini, Manar Al Shehi, Firdous Jahan, Mohammed Al-Alawi
{"title":"Psychological impact of COVID-19 on university students in Oman: an examination of stress, resilience and meaning in life","authors":"Moon Fai Chan, Tamadhir Al-Mahrouqi, Salim Al-Huseini, Maryam Al-Mukhaini, Manar Al Shehi, Firdous Jahan, Mohammed Al-Alawi","doi":"10.1108/he-05-2023-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This cross-sectional online survey in Oman in April 2021 aimed to assess university students' resilience, stress levels and meaning during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify characteristic profiles. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from full-time students at one University in Oman. Outcomes included sociodemographic information, the brief resilience scale, the perceived stress scale-4 and the meaning in life questionnaire to explore the students' profiles. Findings A total of 964 students participated (response rate = 34.8%), of which 35% had low resilience scores. The average perceived stress, presence of meaning in life and search for meaning in life scores were 7.9 ± 2.3, 24.2 ± 6.9 and 24.9 ± 7.7, respectively. Cluster analysis identified three groups: low-risk and fewer impacts (cluster A, n = 503, 523%), moderate-risk and moderate impacts (cluster B, n = 160, 16.6%) and high-risk and more impacts (cluster C, n = 301, 31.2%). Cluster C students experienced more psychological problems and were at high risk during the pandemic. Research limitations/implications The respondents' honesty is a possible error that could influence the results. Low response rates limit its generalizability, and cause-effect relationships among mental health outcomes cannot be discerned. Practical implications This study identified three distinct groups of students, each with different levels of severity in their health problems. There is an increased need for education and counseling to support students during this period, and university management should focus on implementing personal precautionary measures and providing high-tech, user-friendly platforms for students to enhance their learning. Originality/value These findings suggest that tailored strategies should be developed to address the unique psychological needs of each group. The study provides important information for university management to understand the pandemic's psychological impact on students and develop effective interventions to support their well-being.","PeriodicalId":47067,"journal":{"name":"Health Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/he-05-2023-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This cross-sectional online survey in Oman in April 2021 aimed to assess university students' resilience, stress levels and meaning during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify characteristic profiles. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from full-time students at one University in Oman. Outcomes included sociodemographic information, the brief resilience scale, the perceived stress scale-4 and the meaning in life questionnaire to explore the students' profiles. Findings A total of 964 students participated (response rate = 34.8%), of which 35% had low resilience scores. The average perceived stress, presence of meaning in life and search for meaning in life scores were 7.9 ± 2.3, 24.2 ± 6.9 and 24.9 ± 7.7, respectively. Cluster analysis identified three groups: low-risk and fewer impacts (cluster A, n = 503, 523%), moderate-risk and moderate impacts (cluster B, n = 160, 16.6%) and high-risk and more impacts (cluster C, n = 301, 31.2%). Cluster C students experienced more psychological problems and were at high risk during the pandemic. Research limitations/implications The respondents' honesty is a possible error that could influence the results. Low response rates limit its generalizability, and cause-effect relationships among mental health outcomes cannot be discerned. Practical implications This study identified three distinct groups of students, each with different levels of severity in their health problems. There is an increased need for education and counseling to support students during this period, and university management should focus on implementing personal precautionary measures and providing high-tech, user-friendly platforms for students to enhance their learning. Originality/value These findings suggest that tailored strategies should be developed to address the unique psychological needs of each group. The study provides important information for university management to understand the pandemic's psychological impact on students and develop effective interventions to support their well-being.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病对阿曼大学生的心理影响:对压力、适应力和生活意义的考察
这项横断面在线调查于2021年4月在阿曼进行,旨在评估大学生在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的适应能力、压力水平和意义,并确定特征概况。设计/方法/方法采用横断面调查设计收集阿曼一所大学全日制学生的数据。结果包括社会人口学信息、心理弹性简要量表、压力感知量表-4和生活意义问卷来探讨学生的概况。调查结果共有964名学生参与,回应率为34.8%,其中35%的学生心理弹性得分较低。压力感知、生活意义存在和寻找生活意义的平均得分分别为7.9±2.3分、24.2±6.9分和24.9±7.7分。聚类分析确定了低风险和较少影响(A类,n = 503, 523%)、中风险和中等影响(B类,n = 160, 16.6%)和高风险和较多影响(C类,n = 301, 31.2%)三组。C组学生经历了更多的心理问题,并且在大流行期间面临高风险。研究局限/启示被调查者的诚实度是一个可能影响结果的错误。低应答率限制了其普遍性,并且无法辨别心理健康结果之间的因果关系。实际意义这项研究确定了三组不同的学生,每组学生的健康问题严重程度不同。在此期间,对教育和咨询的需求增加,以支持学生,大学管理层应注重实施个人预防措施,并为学生提供高科技,人性化的平台,以提高他们的学习。这些发现表明,应该制定量身定制的策略来满足每个群体独特的心理需求。这项研究为大学管理层了解疫情对学生的心理影响,并制定有效的干预措施以支持他们的福祉提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education
Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The range of topics covered is necessarily extremely wide. Recent examples include: ■Sex and sexuality ■Mental health ■Occupational health education ■Health communication ■The arts and health ■Personal change ■Healthy eating ■User involvement ■Drug and tobacco education ■Ethical issues in health education ■Developing the evidence base
期刊最新文献
“Oh … that Mommy needs a bit of help as well”: why every school needs a health and wellbeing lead “It’s expected that students want to get drunk. that needs to change”: alcohol abstainer and light drinking university student experiences Balancing diets: diverse values shaping sustainable food choices Promoting equity and social justice: analysing the global impact of educational laws on sex education in Spain and the United Kingdom Developing new healthcare practice learning environments through a third-space reflective practice approach: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1