A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Japanese Classifiers

Sandra Astariani
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Japanese Classifiers","authors":"Sandra Astariani","doi":"10.24843/ling.2023.v30.i02.p05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract 
 Classifiers belong to open class noun. All languages are naturally occupied with classifiers, yet the usage is various depending on how the language treats them. Japanese language, as an obligatory-classifier language, makes the classifiers compulsory, in contrast with an optional-classifier language, Indonesian language. Despite this, Japanese and Indonesian languages treat the classifiers syntactically and semantically similar. This article aims at revealing, both the semantic and syntactic differences and similarities between Japanese and Indonesian classifiers. The analysis shows that in terms of structure, Japanese and Indonesian classifiers are similar; however, each language demonstrates difference in classifier use. Japanese language has nineteen frequently used classifiers including two types which can replace others. They can change their form by fusing with its numeral adjective as in hitori (ichi-nin), ippiki (ichi-hiki), without affecting the whole meaning of the noun phrase. Indonesian classifiers cover of twenty-two optional types. Classifiers are often omitted in spoken form to avoid formality and some of them can also change their form by adding se- prior to the numeral adjective to indicate “one object” as in sebatang rokok.","PeriodicalId":55839,"journal":{"name":"Linguistika","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ling.2023.v30.i02.p05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Classifiers belong to open class noun. All languages are naturally occupied with classifiers, yet the usage is various depending on how the language treats them. Japanese language, as an obligatory-classifier language, makes the classifiers compulsory, in contrast with an optional-classifier language, Indonesian language. Despite this, Japanese and Indonesian languages treat the classifiers syntactically and semantically similar. This article aims at revealing, both the semantic and syntactic differences and similarities between Japanese and Indonesian classifiers. The analysis shows that in terms of structure, Japanese and Indonesian classifiers are similar; however, each language demonstrates difference in classifier use. Japanese language has nineteen frequently used classifiers including two types which can replace others. They can change their form by fusing with its numeral adjective as in hitori (ichi-nin), ippiki (ichi-hiki), without affecting the whole meaning of the noun phrase. Indonesian classifiers cover of twenty-two optional types. Classifiers are often omitted in spoken form to avoid formality and some of them can also change their form by adding se- prior to the numeral adjective to indicate “one object” as in sebatang rokok.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼语和日语分类词的比较研究
文摘& # x0D;分类词属于开放类名词。所有语言都自然地使用分类器,但根据语言如何对待它们,其用法也各不相同。日语作为一种强制性分类语言,其分类词是强制性的,而印度尼西亚语是一种选择性分类语言。尽管如此,日语和印度尼西亚语言在语法和语义上对待分类器是相似的。本文旨在揭示日语和印尼语在语义和句法上的异同。分析表明,在结构上,日语和印度尼西亚语的分类器是相似的;然而,每种语言在分类器的使用上表现出差异。日语有19个常用的分类词,其中包括两种可以替代其他分类词的分类词。它们可以通过与数词形容词融合来改变其形式,如hitori(一仁),ippiki(一贵),而不会影响名词短语的整体意义。印度尼西亚分类器包括22种可选类型。在口语中,为了避免正式,通常会省略分类词,有些分类词也可以通过在数词形容词前加se-来表示“一个对象”,如sebatang rokok。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Crosswords as Reading Comprehension Assessment Language Style Used by Characters in Moxie Movie An Analysis of Derivational Suffixes Used in @Wetheurban Instagram Posts A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Japanese Classifiers Verbal and Visual Sign in “Encanto” Movie Posters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1