Prevalence of possible occupational carcinogenic exposures in Brazilian workers: what does the National Health Survey say?

Fernanda de Albuqueque Melo Nogueira, Giseli Nogueira Damacena, Ubirani Barros Otero, Christiane Soares Pereira Madeira, Helen Paredes de Souza, Celia Landmann Szwarcwald
{"title":"Prevalence of possible occupational carcinogenic exposures in Brazilian workers: what does the National Health Survey say?","authors":"Fernanda de Albuqueque Melo Nogueira, Giseli Nogueira Damacena, Ubirani Barros Otero, Christiane Soares Pereira Madeira, Helen Paredes de Souza, Celia Landmann Szwarcwald","doi":"10.1590/2317-6369/34322en2023v48edepi8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: to estimate the prevalence of possible carcinogenic exposures in Brazilian workers. Methods: cross-sectional study, with data from the 2019 National Health Survey. We calculated the prevalences and respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for possible exposure to six occupational carcinogens: solar radiation, chemical substances, mineral dust, radioactive material, night work, and passive smoking at work, according to occupation and sex, considering the complex sample design. Results: 44,822 workers were included, 56.33% were male. Reported exposure to at least one carcinogenic agent from group 1, according to the classification of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, 49.0% (95%CI 47.8;50.2) of male workers and 16.9% (95%CI 16.0;17.9) of female workers. Male workers, compared with female workers, had a higher prevalence of exposure to solar radiation (38.1% [95%CI 37.0;39.3] vs 6.6% [95%CI 6.0;7.2]), chemical agents (19.4% [95%CI 18.5;20.5] vs 8.3% [95%CI 7.6;9.1]), mineral dust (18.9% [95%CI 17.9;20.0] vs 3.3% [95%CI 2.9;3.8]), night work (15.5% [95%CI 14.7;16.5] vs 9.4% [95%CI 8.6;10.2]), and passive smoking (14.3% [95%CI 13.3;15.4] vs 8.2% [95%CI 7.6;9.0]). Conclusion: the prevalence of exposure to possible occupational carcinogens is high and unequally distributed by sex and occupation. Actions to reduce, replace, and eliminate these carcinogens should be prioritized.","PeriodicalId":30075,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Saude Ocupacional","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Saude Ocupacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6369/34322en2023v48edepi8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective: to estimate the prevalence of possible carcinogenic exposures in Brazilian workers. Methods: cross-sectional study, with data from the 2019 National Health Survey. We calculated the prevalences and respective 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for possible exposure to six occupational carcinogens: solar radiation, chemical substances, mineral dust, radioactive material, night work, and passive smoking at work, according to occupation and sex, considering the complex sample design. Results: 44,822 workers were included, 56.33% were male. Reported exposure to at least one carcinogenic agent from group 1, according to the classification of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, 49.0% (95%CI 47.8;50.2) of male workers and 16.9% (95%CI 16.0;17.9) of female workers. Male workers, compared with female workers, had a higher prevalence of exposure to solar radiation (38.1% [95%CI 37.0;39.3] vs 6.6% [95%CI 6.0;7.2]), chemical agents (19.4% [95%CI 18.5;20.5] vs 8.3% [95%CI 7.6;9.1]), mineral dust (18.9% [95%CI 17.9;20.0] vs 3.3% [95%CI 2.9;3.8]), night work (15.5% [95%CI 14.7;16.5] vs 9.4% [95%CI 8.6;10.2]), and passive smoking (14.3% [95%CI 13.3;15.4] vs 8.2% [95%CI 7.6;9.0]). Conclusion: the prevalence of exposure to possible occupational carcinogens is high and unequally distributed by sex and occupation. Actions to reduce, replace, and eliminate these carcinogens should be prioritized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西工人可能的职业致癌暴露的患病率:国家健康调查说了什么?
目的:估计巴西工人可能致癌暴露的患病率。方法:横断面研究,数据来自2019年全国健康调查。考虑到复杂的样本设计,我们根据职业和性别计算了六种职业致癌物可能暴露的患病率和各自的95%置信区间(95% ci):太阳辐射、化学物质、矿物粉尘、放射性物质、夜间工作和工作中被动吸烟。结果:共纳入职工44822人,其中男性占56.33%。根据国际癌症研究机构的分类,报告暴露于至少一种来自第1组的致癌物质,男性工人为49.0% (95%CI 47.8;50.2),女性工人为16.9% (95%CI 16.0;17.9)。与女工相比,男性工人暴露于太阳辐射(38.1% [95%CI 37.0;39.3]对6.6% [95%CI 6.0;7.2])、化学剂(19.4% [95%CI 18.5;20.5]对8.3% [95%CI 7.6;9.1])、矿物粉尘(18.9% [95%CI 17.9;20.0]对3.3% [95%CI 2.9;3.8])、夜间工作(15.5% [95%CI 14.7;16.5]对9.4% [95%CI 8.6;10.2])和被动吸烟(14.3% [95%CI 13.3;15.4]对8.2% [95%CI 7.6;9.0])的患病率更高。结论:职业性致癌物暴露率较高,且性别和职业分布不均。应优先采取行动减少、替代和消除这些致癌物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Afastamento do trabalho por distúrbios musculoesqueléticos entre os professores da educação básica no Brasil Saúde sem colarinhos: desafios da saúde ocupacional no advento do pós-Fordismo Estudos epidemiológicos ocupacionais em área rural: desafios metodológicos Acidentes ampliados - mais do que um conceito, uma história de luta que precisa ser atualizada Ocupação e câncer no Brasil: um desafio perene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1