{"title":"Beyond the debate: decolonisation, decoloniality and the reframing of development in Africa","authors":"Edlyne E. Anugwom","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe paper argues that the current quest for decolonisation and decoloniality struggles are primarily embodiments of disenchantment with the development doldrums in the continent after decades of political independence. While both decolonisation and decoloniality sound like intellectual pursuits concerned with knowledge production, they are in essence efforts towards recasting and rebooting development in the continent. Despite ingrained differences both decolonisation and decoloniality, aspire towards unmasking the futility and incompleteness of Euro-American epistemological traditions and worldviews. Despite differences in the usage of concepts, both decolonisation and decoloniality reframe the notion of ‘delinking’ made popular by Samir Amin. In effect, Amin may rightly be conceived as a precursor of the decolonisation struggle. Apart from agitating for a pluriversality of epistemic traditions and ‘ways of knowing’, both decolonisation and decoloniality seek to reposition Africa in global relations of power and politics and from the above engender sustainable development. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Given the vastness of his writings and expansive but articulate span of his ideas I am only going to systematically excerpt those aspects of his writings with direct bearing on the theme of this paper and the discussion pursued thus far. In other words, this is neither a comprehensive rehash nor a thorough-going evaluation or critique of Amin. I would leave such chores to those who are better equipped for them.","PeriodicalId":45047,"journal":{"name":"Politikon","volume":"123 21","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politikon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2023.2280388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTThe paper argues that the current quest for decolonisation and decoloniality struggles are primarily embodiments of disenchantment with the development doldrums in the continent after decades of political independence. While both decolonisation and decoloniality sound like intellectual pursuits concerned with knowledge production, they are in essence efforts towards recasting and rebooting development in the continent. Despite ingrained differences both decolonisation and decoloniality, aspire towards unmasking the futility and incompleteness of Euro-American epistemological traditions and worldviews. Despite differences in the usage of concepts, both decolonisation and decoloniality reframe the notion of ‘delinking’ made popular by Samir Amin. In effect, Amin may rightly be conceived as a precursor of the decolonisation struggle. Apart from agitating for a pluriversality of epistemic traditions and ‘ways of knowing’, both decolonisation and decoloniality seek to reposition Africa in global relations of power and politics and from the above engender sustainable development. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Given the vastness of his writings and expansive but articulate span of his ideas I am only going to systematically excerpt those aspects of his writings with direct bearing on the theme of this paper and the discussion pursued thus far. In other words, this is neither a comprehensive rehash nor a thorough-going evaluation or critique of Amin. I would leave such chores to those who are better equipped for them.
期刊介绍:
Politikon focuses primarily on South African politics, but not exclusively so. Over the years the journal has published articles by some of the world" leading political scientists, including Arend Lijphart, Samuel Huntingdon, and Philippe Schmitter. It has also featured important contributions from South Africa"s leading political philosophers, political scientists and international relations experts. It has proved an influential journal, particularly in debates over the merits of South Africa"s constitutional reforms (in 1983 and 1994). In the last few years special issues have focused on women and politics in South Africa, and the South African election of 1999.