Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Operative Technique for Cervical Radiculopathy

AHMED ATALLAH SAAD, M.D.*** MOSTAFA F. TANTAWY, M.D.*; AHMED
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Operative Technique for Cervical Radiculopathy","authors":"AHMED ATALLAH SAAD, M.D.*** MOSTAFA F. TANTAWY, M.D.*; AHMED","doi":"10.21608/mjcu.2023.318275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiculopathy caused by cervical disc disease is a frequently encountered pathology among spine specialists. While non-operative treatment methods can effectively manage the condition, surgical interventions are available as an option if conservative treatment is unsuccessful. The objective of this study is to provide a brief account of our recent encounter with posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Aim of Study: To present our short-term experience regarding posterior cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy. Efficacy, safety, and technique would be reported. Patients and Methods: A review was conducted on our institution's database covering the period from 2019 to 2022. The review identified 35 patients who had consecutively undergone Posterior cervical foraminotomy. The study compared the pre-intervention visual analogue scale (VAS) with the post-intervention VAS at three months (post VAS 2) to evaluate the levels of neck pain (VASn) and arm pain (VASa). Results: Concerning the functional outcome, the average VASn Pre was 6.17, the average VASn Final was 2.09, the average VASa Pre was 6.97 and the average VASa Final was 1.29. The difference between VASn Pre and VASn Final was statistically significant as the p -value was less than 0.05. The difference between VASa Pre and VASa Final was statistically significant as the p -value was less than 0.05. No complications were reported in our study. Conclusion: Considerable clinical improvement was observed in patients suffering from radiculopathy caused by cervical disc disease who underwent treatment with posterior cervical foraminotomy. The aforementioned procedure has been deemed both safe and effective in the treatment of the aforementioned pathology.","PeriodicalId":22964,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Journal of Cairo University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Journal of Cairo University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2023.318275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiculopathy caused by cervical disc disease is a frequently encountered pathology among spine specialists. While non-operative treatment methods can effectively manage the condition, surgical interventions are available as an option if conservative treatment is unsuccessful. The objective of this study is to provide a brief account of our recent encounter with posterior cervical foraminotomy for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Aim of Study: To present our short-term experience regarding posterior cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy. Efficacy, safety, and technique would be reported. Patients and Methods: A review was conducted on our institution's database covering the period from 2019 to 2022. The review identified 35 patients who had consecutively undergone Posterior cervical foraminotomy. The study compared the pre-intervention visual analogue scale (VAS) with the post-intervention VAS at three months (post VAS 2) to evaluate the levels of neck pain (VASn) and arm pain (VASa). Results: Concerning the functional outcome, the average VASn Pre was 6.17, the average VASn Final was 2.09, the average VASa Pre was 6.97 and the average VASa Final was 1.29. The difference between VASn Pre and VASn Final was statistically significant as the p -value was less than 0.05. The difference between VASa Pre and VASa Final was statistically significant as the p -value was less than 0.05. No complications were reported in our study. Conclusion: Considerable clinical improvement was observed in patients suffering from radiculopathy caused by cervical disc disease who underwent treatment with posterior cervical foraminotomy. The aforementioned procedure has been deemed both safe and effective in the treatment of the aforementioned pathology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎后椎间孔切开术治疗颈椎神经根病的疗效和安全性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Vestibular Versus Dual-Task Training on Balance in Children with Diplegic Cerebral Palsy Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: How to identify by Imaging Features? Predictors of Mortality for Patients with Severe COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit Functional Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Prolapse Factors Affecting Visual Outcomes after Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1