Effectiveness of Vestibular Versus Dual-Task Training on Balance in Children with Diplegic Cerebral Palsy

H. A. E. P. AMIRA A. MAHMOUD, M.Sc.; SILVIA
{"title":"Effectiveness of Vestibular Versus Dual-Task Training on Balance in Children with Diplegic Cerebral Palsy","authors":"H. A. E. P. AMIRA A. MAHMOUD, M.Sc.; SILVIA","doi":"10.21608/mjcu.2023.325783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cerebral palsyis a neurodevelopmental disorder that caused by non-progressive lesion to the immature brain, this lesion causes permanent motor disability that presents with or without other associated disorders. Diplegia is a CP'S subtype where the four limbs of the body affected with more affection in both lower limbs. Balance problems are major problems faced by these children. Aim of Study: The purpose of the current study was to investigate which is more effective and has a better impact on balance in diplegic CP. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-four children with diplegic Cerebral Palsy of both genders, aged from 5 to 11 years with spasticity ranged from grade 1 or 1+ according to Modified Ashworth Scale and they were at level I or II on Gross Motor Function Classification System participated in the study. They were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups; All the included children received traditional physical therapy program while group (A) received additional vestibular training program, and group (B) received additional dual-task training program. Balance was assessed before and after the study using HUMAC balance system and pediatric balance scale. Results: There was significant increase in all variables that represent balance ( p >0.001), center of pressure, eye open firm surface, eye closed firm surfaceand pediatric balance scale in both group post treatment compared with pretreatment results, but there was no significant difference betweenall these variablesin the between groups comparison pre or post treatment ( p >0.05). Conclusion: Both vestibular training and dual task training improve balance of diplegic children mostly to the same extent, therefore, we can recommend them as basic protocols that should be included in the treatment plan for diplegic children.","PeriodicalId":22964,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Journal of Cairo University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Journal of Cairo University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2023.325783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral palsyis a neurodevelopmental disorder that caused by non-progressive lesion to the immature brain, this lesion causes permanent motor disability that presents with or without other associated disorders. Diplegia is a CP'S subtype where the four limbs of the body affected with more affection in both lower limbs. Balance problems are major problems faced by these children. Aim of Study: The purpose of the current study was to investigate which is more effective and has a better impact on balance in diplegic CP. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-four children with diplegic Cerebral Palsy of both genders, aged from 5 to 11 years with spasticity ranged from grade 1 or 1+ according to Modified Ashworth Scale and they were at level I or II on Gross Motor Function Classification System participated in the study. They were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups; All the included children received traditional physical therapy program while group (A) received additional vestibular training program, and group (B) received additional dual-task training program. Balance was assessed before and after the study using HUMAC balance system and pediatric balance scale. Results: There was significant increase in all variables that represent balance ( p >0.001), center of pressure, eye open firm surface, eye closed firm surfaceand pediatric balance scale in both group post treatment compared with pretreatment results, but there was no significant difference betweenall these variablesin the between groups comparison pre or post treatment ( p >0.05). Conclusion: Both vestibular training and dual task training improve balance of diplegic children mostly to the same extent, therefore, we can recommend them as basic protocols that should be included in the treatment plan for diplegic children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭训练与双任务训练对脑瘫偏瘫儿童平衡能力的影响
背景:脑瘫是一种神经发育障碍,由未成熟大脑的非进行性病变引起,这种病变导致永久性运动障碍,可伴有或不伴有其他相关疾病。偏瘫是脑瘫的一种亚型,患者的四肢都会受到影响,其中以双下肢最为严重。平衡问题是这些儿童面临的主要问题。研究目的:本研究的目的是调查哪种方法对双瘫儿童的平衡能力更有效、影响更大。研究对象和方法:34 名患有双腿截瘫的男女脑瘫患儿参加了此次研究,他们的年龄在 5 至 11 岁之间,根据 "改良阿什沃斯量表",痉挛程度在 1 级或 1+ 级之间,在 "粗大运动功能分级系统 "中处于 I 级或 II 级。他们被随机分配到两个相同的组别:所有儿童都接受了传统的物理治疗方案,而(A)组则接受了额外的前庭训练方案,(B)组则接受了额外的双任务训练方案。研究前后使用 HUMAC 平衡系统和小儿平衡量表对儿童的平衡能力进行评估。结果显示与治疗前的结果相比,两组患者治疗后代表平衡的所有变量(P >0.001)、压力中心、睁眼稳固面、闭眼稳固面和小儿平衡量表均有明显增加,但在治疗前后的组间比较中,所有这些变量之间没有明显差异(P >0.05)。结论前庭训练和双任务训练对偏瘫儿童平衡能力的改善程度基本一致,因此,我们建议将这两种训练作为基本方案纳入偏瘫儿童的治疗计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Vestibular Versus Dual-Task Training on Balance in Children with Diplegic Cerebral Palsy Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: How to identify by Imaging Features? Predictors of Mortality for Patients with Severe COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit Functional Outcome of Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Prolapse Factors Affecting Visual Outcomes after Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1