Using Team Discussions to Understand Behavior in Indefinitely Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Games

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS American Economic Journal-Microeconomics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1257/mic.20210012
David J. Cooper, John H. Kagel
{"title":"Using Team Discussions to Understand Behavior in Indefinitely Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Games","authors":"David J. Cooper, John H. Kagel","doi":"10.1257/mic.20210012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare behavior of two person teams with individuals in indefinitely repeated prisoner dilemma games with perfect monitoring. Team discussions are used to understand the rationale underlying these choices and how these choices come about. There are three main findings: (i) Teams learned to cooperate faster than individuals, and cooperation was more stable for teams. (ii) Strategies identified from team dialogues differ from those identified by the Strategy Frequency Estimation Method. This reflects the improvisational nature of teams’ decision making. (iii) Increasing cooperation was primarily driven by teams unilaterally cooperating in the hope of inducing their opponent to cooperate. (JEL C72, C73, C92)","PeriodicalId":47467,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Journal-Microeconomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Journal-Microeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20210012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We compare behavior of two person teams with individuals in indefinitely repeated prisoner dilemma games with perfect monitoring. Team discussions are used to understand the rationale underlying these choices and how these choices come about. There are three main findings: (i) Teams learned to cooperate faster than individuals, and cooperation was more stable for teams. (ii) Strategies identified from team dialogues differ from those identified by the Strategy Frequency Estimation Method. This reflects the improvisational nature of teams’ decision making. (iii) Increasing cooperation was primarily driven by teams unilaterally cooperating in the hope of inducing their opponent to cooperate. (JEL C72, C73, C92)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用团队讨论来理解无限重复囚徒困境博弈中的行为
我们比较了在无限重复的囚徒困境博弈中两个人的行为。团队讨论用于理解这些选择的基本原理以及这些选择是如何产生的。有三个主要发现:(i)团队比个人学习合作更快,团队的合作更稳定。(ii)从团队对话中确定的策略不同于策略频率估计方法确定的策略。这反映了团队决策的即时性。增加合作主要是由于各队单方面合作,希望诱使其对手合作。(凝胶c72, c73, c92)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Smaller Slices of a Growing Pie: The Effects of Entry in Platform Markets Using Team Discussions to Understand Behavior in Indefinitely Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Games Slope Takers in Anonymous Markets Monopolistic Competition and Efficiency under Firm Heterogeneity and Nonadditive Preferences Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1