Pattern recognition as a learning strategy in the study of engineering dynamics

Simon Li, Kashif Raza, Ahmad Ghasemloonia, Catherine Chua
{"title":"Pattern recognition as a learning strategy in the study of engineering dynamics","authors":"Simon Li, Kashif Raza, Ahmad Ghasemloonia, Catherine Chua","doi":"10.1177/03064190231203692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As engineering dynamics remains a difficult subject to teach and learn, this study was initiated by an observation from the authors’ experience of how students pass dynamics without necessarily understanding all the fundamental concepts. This observation motivates the research on ‘pattern recognition’ as a learning strategy that emphasizes practising sample problems and solving similar problems in assessments. This research consisted of two parts. First, we analysed the notion of pattern recognition from two angles: (a) how it is contrasted with conceptual understanding in view of mental simulation and (b) how it is defined in the fields of computer science and cognitive psychology. We found that pattern recognition could be characterized using three features: (a) use of sample cases, (b) learning through practice, and (c) emphasis on correct patterns. Subsequently, we conducted a survey to identify evidence of pattern recognition from students as their learning strategy. With Cronbach’s alpha coefficient value at 0.649, a moderate but acceptable value, we discovered that our survey instrument was able to distinguish learners who tend to use pattern recognition as a strategy to solve problems, which is considered reasonable for a pilot investigation. We also found evidence that learners using pattern recognition tend to emphasize practice problems and memorization and de-emphasize the learning of fundamental concepts. We consider that pattern recognition could provide a new aspect to understand how learners learn technical subjects in engineering education.","PeriodicalId":75028,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231203692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As engineering dynamics remains a difficult subject to teach and learn, this study was initiated by an observation from the authors’ experience of how students pass dynamics without necessarily understanding all the fundamental concepts. This observation motivates the research on ‘pattern recognition’ as a learning strategy that emphasizes practising sample problems and solving similar problems in assessments. This research consisted of two parts. First, we analysed the notion of pattern recognition from two angles: (a) how it is contrasted with conceptual understanding in view of mental simulation and (b) how it is defined in the fields of computer science and cognitive psychology. We found that pattern recognition could be characterized using three features: (a) use of sample cases, (b) learning through practice, and (c) emphasis on correct patterns. Subsequently, we conducted a survey to identify evidence of pattern recognition from students as their learning strategy. With Cronbach’s alpha coefficient value at 0.649, a moderate but acceptable value, we discovered that our survey instrument was able to distinguish learners who tend to use pattern recognition as a strategy to solve problems, which is considered reasonable for a pilot investigation. We also found evidence that learners using pattern recognition tend to emphasize practice problems and memorization and de-emphasize the learning of fundamental concepts. We consider that pattern recognition could provide a new aspect to understand how learners learn technical subjects in engineering education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模式识别作为工程动力学研究中的一种学习策略
由于工程动力学仍然是一门难以教授和学习的学科,这项研究是由作者的观察经验发起的,即学生如何在没有必要理解所有基本概念的情况下通过动力学。这一观察激发了对“模式识别”的研究,将其作为一种学习策略,强调在评估中练习示例问题和解决类似问题。本研究由两部分组成。首先,我们从两个角度分析了模式识别的概念:(a)如何将其与心理模拟的概念理解进行对比;(b)如何在计算机科学和认知心理学领域对其进行定义。我们发现模式识别可以用三个特征来描述:(a)使用样本案例,(b)通过实践学习,(c)强调正确的模式。随后,我们进行了一项调查,以确定学生模式识别的证据作为他们的学习策略。Cronbach的alpha系数值为0.649,是一个适中但可以接受的值,我们发现我们的调查工具能够区分出倾向于使用模式识别作为解决问题的策略的学习者,这被认为是合理的试点调查。我们还发现,使用模式识别的学习者倾向于强调实践问题和记忆,而不强调基本概念的学习。我们认为模式识别可以为理解学习者如何在工程教育中学习技术科目提供一个新的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and benefits of hybrid methodology: Flipped classroom and project-based learning in mechanical engineering courses An integrated e-learning approach for teaching statics to undergraduate engineering students Active learning modules for a numerical methods course Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces Impact of 3D-printed laboratory equipment in vibrations and controls courses on student engineering identity, motivation, and mindset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1