Implementation and benefits of hybrid methodology: Flipped classroom and project-based learning in mechanical engineering courses

Rafael Bolivar, Neyl Richard Triviño Jaimes, Edgard Aureliando Gonzalez
{"title":"Implementation and benefits of hybrid methodology: Flipped classroom and project-based learning in mechanical engineering courses","authors":"Rafael Bolivar, Neyl Richard Triviño Jaimes, Edgard Aureliando Gonzalez","doi":"10.1177/03064190231209989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research article introduces a hybrid methodology encompassing project-based learning (PjBL) and flipped classroom (FC) approaches. It is aimed to advance the comprehension of the implementation and benefits of FC and PjBL methodologies, particularly within engineering education. The hybrid methodology was implemented in a Mechanical Engineering program during the first semester of 2022. It was designed to address synchronous class restrictions caused by the pandemic, leading to online classes via the Microsoft Teams platform. The population consisted of 101 students from various semesters and courses. Implementation involved quizzes, workshops, a classroom project, and personal challenges as evaluation activities. The FC materials included explanatory videos, solved problems, readings, and slides. These materials were organised on the Moodle platform. The research employed quantitative and qualitative methodologies, formulating five hypotheses and designing a 14-indicator survey. The data were analysed using statistical methods such as Cronbach's alpha, Guttman's split-half, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, KMO analysis, Bartlett's test, principal component analysis, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, and Spearman's rho. Results indicated excellent reliability of the survey indicators, non-parametric data, and good adequacy of the proposed structure. Analysis indicated that the implementation of this methodology leads to significant benefits in terms of satisfaction, emotional engagement and stimulation levels, resulting in more effective learning and preference over the traditional approach. The perception of technology, timing, and content of videos varied among different courses. Positive comments from students supported the benefits of the hybrid methodology. It was recommended to improve the selection and quality of study materials.","PeriodicalId":75028,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","volume":"52 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of mechanical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03064190231209989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research article introduces a hybrid methodology encompassing project-based learning (PjBL) and flipped classroom (FC) approaches. It is aimed to advance the comprehension of the implementation and benefits of FC and PjBL methodologies, particularly within engineering education. The hybrid methodology was implemented in a Mechanical Engineering program during the first semester of 2022. It was designed to address synchronous class restrictions caused by the pandemic, leading to online classes via the Microsoft Teams platform. The population consisted of 101 students from various semesters and courses. Implementation involved quizzes, workshops, a classroom project, and personal challenges as evaluation activities. The FC materials included explanatory videos, solved problems, readings, and slides. These materials were organised on the Moodle platform. The research employed quantitative and qualitative methodologies, formulating five hypotheses and designing a 14-indicator survey. The data were analysed using statistical methods such as Cronbach's alpha, Guttman's split-half, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, KMO analysis, Bartlett's test, principal component analysis, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, and Spearman's rho. Results indicated excellent reliability of the survey indicators, non-parametric data, and good adequacy of the proposed structure. Analysis indicated that the implementation of this methodology leads to significant benefits in terms of satisfaction, emotional engagement and stimulation levels, resulting in more effective learning and preference over the traditional approach. The perception of technology, timing, and content of videos varied among different courses. Positive comments from students supported the benefits of the hybrid methodology. It was recommended to improve the selection and quality of study materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合教学法的实施与效益:机械工程课程中翻转课堂与专案学习
这篇研究文章介绍了一种包含基于项目的学习(PjBL)和翻转课堂(FC)方法的混合方法。它的目的是促进对FC和PjBL方法的实施和好处的理解,特别是在工程教育中。该混合方法于2022年第一学期在机械工程项目中实施。它的设计是为了解决大流行造成的同步课程限制,导致通过微软团队平台在线课程。调查对象包括来自不同学期和课程的101名学生。实施包括测验、工作坊、课堂计划和个人挑战作为评估活动。FC材料包括解释性视频、解题、阅读材料和幻灯片。这些材料是在Moodle平台上组织的。本研究采用定量和定性相结合的方法,提出了5个假设,设计了一个14个指标的调查。使用Cronbach’s alpha、Guttman’s split-half、Kolmogorov-Smirnov、KMO分析、Bartlett检验、主成分分析、Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA和Spearman’s rho等统计方法对数据进行分析。结果表明,调查指标、非参数数据具有良好的可靠性,所提出的结构具有良好的充分性。分析表明,这种方法的实施在满意度、情感投入和刺激水平方面带来了显著的好处,导致比传统方法更有效的学习和偏好。对技术、时间和视频内容的理解在不同的课程中有所不同。学生们的积极评价支持了这种混合方法的好处。建议改进研究材料的选择和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation and benefits of hybrid methodology: Flipped classroom and project-based learning in mechanical engineering courses An integrated e-learning approach for teaching statics to undergraduate engineering students Active learning modules for a numerical methods course Enhancing user experience and usability in engineering education: A comparative analysis of multiple functions and tangible user interfaces Impact of 3D-printed laboratory equipment in vibrations and controls courses on student engineering identity, motivation, and mindset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1