Parental educational styles from parents’ and children’s perspectives

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia Pub Date : 2023-09-29 DOI:10.13042/bordon.2023.94551
Mercedes Inda-Caro, Carmen-María Fernández-García, María-Paulina Viñuela-Hernández
{"title":"Parental educational styles from parents’ and children’s perspectives","authors":"Mercedes Inda-Caro, Carmen-María Fernández-García, María-Paulina Viñuela-Hernández","doi":"10.13042/bordon.2023.94551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. The construction of parental educational styles is diverse and they develop along with the children being raised. Self Determination Theory (SDT) establishes two dimensions to define parental educational behaviours: autonomy support versus control, and structure versus chaos. On the basis of SDT, two parental educational styles are pointed: authoritative and harsh. This study analyses the relationship between parental education styles and children’s perceptions of their parents’ behaviours, and the influence of the parent gender. METHOD. The sample comprised 2,404 parents, and 1,234 children from 3 autonomous communities in Spain. The Parents as social context questionnaire was applied, and the Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Scale and Dependency-oriented psychological control scale in children. All of the instruments were adapted into Spanish. Multigroup path analysis was performed to identify the most appropriate model about parental educational styles in family dynamics, taking into account the parent’s gender. RESULTS. Firstly, the authoritative and harsh parental styles were confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis. The findings showed that the ideal model was that where there was no bi-directionality between parents’ perceptions about their educational styles and their children’s perceptions. The chosen model indicates a unidirectional path from parents to children. Being necessary to keep a relation between the child’s perception about the received support for autonomy and parental control. The invariance of the model based on the gender was partially maintained. DISCUSSION. This study shows a model where the authoritative parental style influences child’s perceived autonomy support and where the harsh parental style has effects on child’s perceived threat. The concept of parental psychological control has been discussed. Finally, a balance between authoritative and harsh style, is proposed inside families.","PeriodicalId":45710,"journal":{"name":"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13042/bordon.2023.94551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The construction of parental educational styles is diverse and they develop along with the children being raised. Self Determination Theory (SDT) establishes two dimensions to define parental educational behaviours: autonomy support versus control, and structure versus chaos. On the basis of SDT, two parental educational styles are pointed: authoritative and harsh. This study analyses the relationship between parental education styles and children’s perceptions of their parents’ behaviours, and the influence of the parent gender. METHOD. The sample comprised 2,404 parents, and 1,234 children from 3 autonomous communities in Spain. The Parents as social context questionnaire was applied, and the Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Scale and Dependency-oriented psychological control scale in children. All of the instruments were adapted into Spanish. Multigroup path analysis was performed to identify the most appropriate model about parental educational styles in family dynamics, taking into account the parent’s gender. RESULTS. Firstly, the authoritative and harsh parental styles were confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis. The findings showed that the ideal model was that where there was no bi-directionality between parents’ perceptions about their educational styles and their children’s perceptions. The chosen model indicates a unidirectional path from parents to children. Being necessary to keep a relation between the child’s perception about the received support for autonomy and parental control. The invariance of the model based on the gender was partially maintained. DISCUSSION. This study shows a model where the authoritative parental style influences child’s perceived autonomy support and where the harsh parental style has effects on child’s perceived threat. The concept of parental psychological control has been discussed. Finally, a balance between authoritative and harsh style, is proposed inside families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从父母和孩子的角度看父母的教育方式
介绍。父母教育方式的建构是多种多样的,并随着孩子的成长而发展。自我决定理论(SDT)建立了两个维度来定义父母的教育行为:自主支持与控制,结构与混乱。在SDT的基础上,指出了两种父母教育方式:权威型和严厉型。本研究分析了父母教育方式与子女对父母行为认知的关系,以及父母性别的影响。方法。该样本包括来自西班牙3个自治区的2404名家长和1234名儿童。采用父母作为社会背景问卷、感知父母自主支持量表和儿童依赖导向心理控制量表。所有的乐器都被改编成西班牙语。采用多组路径分析,在考虑父母性别的情况下,确定家庭动态中父母教育方式的最合适模型。结果。首先,通过验证性因子分析,确定了权威型和严厉型父母风格。研究结果表明,理想的模式是父母对自己的教育方式的看法与孩子的看法之间不存在双向性。所选择的模型表示从父母到孩子的单向路径。有必要保持孩子对获得的自主支持和父母控制的感知之间的关系。部分保持了模型基于性别的不变性。讨论。本研究展示了权威型父母风格对儿童自主支持感知的影响模型,以及严厉型父母风格对儿童威胁感知的影响模型。讨论了父母心理控制的概念。最后,在家庭内部提出了权威和苛刻风格之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia
Bordon-Revista de Pedagogia EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Bordon. Journal of Education (ISSN: 0210-5934, e-ISSN: 2340-6577), the publication of the Spanish Pedagogical Society, published continuously since 1949. Originally a monthly publication until 1973, it is now published quarterly. It is a scientific journal in the field of education and gives a humanistic and universal view as an aid for education professionals. The purpose of Bordon is expressed in its presentation article (Issue 1, Year 1, May 1949), highly significant for the cultural moment of the times, and in which it makes this brief statement: “We are attempting to provide a service to education in Spain and even worldwide. As grand as our intention may be, we still believe in simplicity. We are not upset by the risk of failure; if Bordón only becomes of interest in the world of culture and education, we will thank God for helping us hit the mark; if, however, we were to see that we do know how to achieve our goal, we would calmly but perhaps slightly melancholically allow this newborn journal to die. And perhaps in this presence of possible failure may be found the greatest guarantee of continuity, because it will be for us like a permanent call of alert.” Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía is present in all the major indices of scientific quality such as the European Reference Index for the Humanities Proquest, Ebsco… Two external reviewers evaluate all its articles, in accordance with the double-blind peer review system.
期刊最新文献
Intervenciones eficaces para la mejora de las habilidades sociales en personas con trastorno del espectro autista de alto funcionamiento: una revisión sistemática Evidencias psicométricas y análisis de red de la escala inteligencia emocional en estudiantes de instituciones confesionales Contenidos y procesos de aprendizaje en la formación inicial del profesorado de educación primaria El derecho a la educación de la infancia inmigrante en la Unión Europea: un análisis documental Parental educational styles from parents’ and children’s perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1