Does grazing winter cereal rye in Iowa, USA, make it profitable?

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/s1742170523000388
A. Plastina, J. Acharya, F. M. Marcos, M. R. Parvej, M. A. Licht, A. E. Robertson
{"title":"Does grazing winter cereal rye in Iowa, USA, make it profitable?","authors":"A. Plastina, J. Acharya, F. M. Marcos, M. R. Parvej, M. A. Licht, A. E. Robertson","doi":"10.1017/s1742170523000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unproven economic returns at the farm level are a major barrier to large-scale adoption of cover crops. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-run private net returns to producers implementing a cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop preceding the no-till corn ( Zea mays L.) phase of a US Midwest corn–soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr.) rotation in an integrated crop and cow–calf operation. We used experimental agronomic data from six location-years in Iowa to estimate private net returns to cereal rye across alternative scenarios in a partial budget framework. Net returns in the absence of grazing averaged −$123.74 ha −1 and were negative for 82.2% of the treatments, while net returns under partial grazing averaged −$15.24 ha −1 and were negative for 54.8% of the treatments. Early-broadcast cereal rye produced higher biomass and larger net cost savings in the livestock enterprise than late-drilled cereal rye, but it also resulted in higher corn yield penalties. In the no-grazing scenario, net losses for early-broadcast cereal rye were $165.97 ha −1 larger, on average, than for late-drilled cereal rye. Our findings should raise awareness about the low probability of obtaining positive annual private net returns to cereal rye in Iowa in the absence of sizable targeted financial incentives, and inform the policy discussion on the cost-effectiveness of government-sponsored conservation programs.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170523000388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unproven economic returns at the farm level are a major barrier to large-scale adoption of cover crops. The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-run private net returns to producers implementing a cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop preceding the no-till corn ( Zea mays L.) phase of a US Midwest corn–soybean ( Glycine max [L.] Merr.) rotation in an integrated crop and cow–calf operation. We used experimental agronomic data from six location-years in Iowa to estimate private net returns to cereal rye across alternative scenarios in a partial budget framework. Net returns in the absence of grazing averaged −$123.74 ha −1 and were negative for 82.2% of the treatments, while net returns under partial grazing averaged −$15.24 ha −1 and were negative for 54.8% of the treatments. Early-broadcast cereal rye produced higher biomass and larger net cost savings in the livestock enterprise than late-drilled cereal rye, but it also resulted in higher corn yield penalties. In the no-grazing scenario, net losses for early-broadcast cereal rye were $165.97 ha −1 larger, on average, than for late-drilled cereal rye. Our findings should raise awareness about the low probability of obtaining positive annual private net returns to cereal rye in Iowa in the absence of sizable targeted financial incentives, and inform the policy discussion on the cost-effectiveness of government-sponsored conservation programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国爱荷华州放牧冬季黑麦是否有利可图?
农场层面未经证实的经济回报是大规模采用覆盖作物的主要障碍。本研究的目的是评估在美国中西部玉米-大豆(Glycine max [L.])免耕玉米(Zea mays L.)阶段之前实施谷物黑麦(Secale cereale L.)覆盖作物的生产者的短期私人净回报。在作物和小牛的综合经营中轮作。我们使用爱荷华州6个地点年的试验农艺数据,在部分预算框架下估算不同方案下谷物黑麦的私人净回报。在不放牧的情况下,净收益平均为- 123.74 ha - 1, 82.2%的处理为负,而在部分放牧的情况下,净收益平均为- 15.24 ha - 1, 54.8%的处理为负。在畜牧业中,早播黑麦比晚播黑麦产生了更高的生物量和更大的净成本节约,但也导致了更高的玉米产量损失。在不放牧情况下,早播黑麦的净损失平均为165.97公顷- 1,比晚播黑麦大。我们的研究结果应该提高人们对爱荷华州谷物黑麦在缺乏可观的目标财政激励的情况下获得正年度私人净回报的可能性很低的认识,并为政府资助的保护计划的成本效益的政策讨论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (formerly American Journal of Alternative Agriculture) is a multi-disciplinary journal which focuses on the science that underpins economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable approaches to agriculture and food production. The journal publishes original research and review articles on the economic, ecological, and environmental impacts of agriculture; the effective use of renewable resources and biodiversity in agro-ecosystems; and the technological and sociological implications of sustainable food systems. It also contains a discussion forum, which presents lively discussions on new and provocative topics.
期刊最新文献
In the search for pastoral livestock systems that improve the meat quality: An exploratory study Modern arable and diverse ley farming systems can increase soil organic matter faster than global targets Farmers’ resilience to climate change through the circular economy and sustainable agriculture: a review from developed and developing countries Understanding the potential of sustainability turn in farming: review of sociotechnical adoption factors of agri-environmental cropping practices Strategies to overcome stagnation in agricultural adoption despite awareness and interest: a case study of conservation agriculture in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1