In the search for pastoral livestock systems that improve the meat quality: An exploratory study

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1017/s1742170524000127
Carla Velásquez, David Cancino-Baier, John Quiñones-Diaz, Rodrigo Huaiquipan, Alex Muñoz, Néstor Sepúlveda Becker, Rommy Diaz, Erwin A. Paz, Lidiana Velázquez, Gastón Sepúlveda, Daniela Tapia, Fernanda Olivares
{"title":"In the search for pastoral livestock systems that improve the meat quality: An exploratory study","authors":"Carla Velásquez, David Cancino-Baier, John Quiñones-Diaz, Rodrigo Huaiquipan, Alex Muñoz, Néstor Sepúlveda Becker, Rommy Diaz, Erwin A. Paz, Lidiana Velázquez, Gastón Sepúlveda, Daniela Tapia, Fernanda Olivares","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of consumers are expressing concerns about the quality, nutrient content, and safety of the meet products they purchase, alongside animal welfare and the environmental footprint of production systems. Various studies show that grassland-based systems can produce a healthier meat product. In this context, livestock farmers are actively pursuing improvements in their systems focus on sustainability, with regenerative livestock farming emerging as a prominent approach. Most research has focused on showing the differences in the quality of meat comparing pastoral systems and those fed concentrates under controlled environments. However, there are no studies in Chile that evaluate the quality of beef derived from different pastoral systems, particularly those consider adequate data and products sourced directly from livestock sector. This study explores three beef production systems commonly used in southern Chile (conventional, free grazing, and regenerative), evaluating their impact on carcass characteristics, meat quality attributes, and nutritional components. The results show some variations in carcass weight and yield, with free grazing showing better results. Deviations in meat color were observed, with conventional meat being more red and yellow while regenerative meat was less bright. Subcutaneous fat color and water retention capacity were influenced by diet and production methods. Although lipid oxidation showed no differences, 100% grazing-based systems exhibited lower values, suggesting a higher intake of antioxidants. The research highlights the nutritional superiority of beef from grasslands, characterized by a lower intramuscular fat content and higher values of minerals, such as selenium. The complex multifactorial interaction of pastoral systems is also highlighted, impacting the carcass and meat quality. A holistic approach is essential in future research to generate and assess healthy beef.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"200 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increasing number of consumers are expressing concerns about the quality, nutrient content, and safety of the meet products they purchase, alongside animal welfare and the environmental footprint of production systems. Various studies show that grassland-based systems can produce a healthier meat product. In this context, livestock farmers are actively pursuing improvements in their systems focus on sustainability, with regenerative livestock farming emerging as a prominent approach. Most research has focused on showing the differences in the quality of meat comparing pastoral systems and those fed concentrates under controlled environments. However, there are no studies in Chile that evaluate the quality of beef derived from different pastoral systems, particularly those consider adequate data and products sourced directly from livestock sector. This study explores three beef production systems commonly used in southern Chile (conventional, free grazing, and regenerative), evaluating their impact on carcass characteristics, meat quality attributes, and nutritional components. The results show some variations in carcass weight and yield, with free grazing showing better results. Deviations in meat color were observed, with conventional meat being more red and yellow while regenerative meat was less bright. Subcutaneous fat color and water retention capacity were influenced by diet and production methods. Although lipid oxidation showed no differences, 100% grazing-based systems exhibited lower values, suggesting a higher intake of antioxidants. The research highlights the nutritional superiority of beef from grasslands, characterized by a lower intramuscular fat content and higher values of minerals, such as selenium. The complex multifactorial interaction of pastoral systems is also highlighted, impacting the carcass and meat quality. A holistic approach is essential in future research to generate and assess healthy beef.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找能提高肉质的畜牧系统:探索性研究
越来越多的消费者开始关注他们购买的肉类产品的质量、营养成分和安全性,以及动物福利和生产系统对环境的影响。各种研究表明,以草地为基础的生产系统可以生产出更健康的肉类产品。在这种情况下,畜牧业者正积极改善其系统,注重可持续发展,而再生畜牧业正成为一种突出的方法。大多数研究都集中在显示牧业系统与在受控环境下喂养精饲料的系统在肉质上的差异。然而,智利还没有研究对不同牧业系统生产的牛肉质量进行评估,特别是那些考虑到充分数据和产品直接来自畜牧业的研究。本研究探讨了智利南部常用的三种牛肉生产系统(传统、自由放牧和再生),评估了它们对胴体特征、肉质属性和营养成分的影响。结果显示,胴体重量和产量存在一些差异,自由放牧的效果更好。肉的颜色也有差异,传统肉更红更黄,而再生肉则不那么鲜艳。皮下脂肪的颜色和保水能力受日粮和生产方式的影响。虽然脂质氧化没有显示出差异,但以 100%放牧为基础的系统显示出较低的值,表明抗氧化剂的摄入量较高。这项研究强调了草地牛肉的营养优势,其特点是肌肉内脂肪含量较低,硒等矿物质含量较高。研究还强调了牧业系统复杂的多因素相互作用对胴体和肉质的影响。在未来的研究中,必须采用综合方法来生产和评估健康牛肉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems (formerly American Journal of Alternative Agriculture) is a multi-disciplinary journal which focuses on the science that underpins economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable approaches to agriculture and food production. The journal publishes original research and review articles on the economic, ecological, and environmental impacts of agriculture; the effective use of renewable resources and biodiversity in agro-ecosystems; and the technological and sociological implications of sustainable food systems. It also contains a discussion forum, which presents lively discussions on new and provocative topics.
期刊最新文献
In the search for pastoral livestock systems that improve the meat quality: An exploratory study Modern arable and diverse ley farming systems can increase soil organic matter faster than global targets Farmers’ resilience to climate change through the circular economy and sustainable agriculture: a review from developed and developing countries Understanding the potential of sustainability turn in farming: review of sociotechnical adoption factors of agri-environmental cropping practices Strategies to overcome stagnation in agricultural adoption despite awareness and interest: a case study of conservation agriculture in South Asia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1