首页 > 最新文献

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems最新文献

英文 中文
Modern arable and diverse ley farming systems can increase soil organic matter faster than global targets 现代耕地和多样化列依耕作制度可以比全球目标更快地增加土壤有机质
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000103
Richard Gantlett, Jacob Bishop, Hannah E. Jones, Martin Lukac
Agriculture can be pivotal in mitigating climate change through soil carbon sequestration. Land conversion to pasture has been identified as the most effective method to achieve this. Yet, it creates a perceived trade-off between increasing soil carbon and maintaining arable food crop production. In this on-farm study, we assessed the potential of incorporating a 2-year diverse ley (consisting of 23 species of legumes, herbs, and grasses) within a 7-year arable crop rotation for soil organic matter accumulation. We established upper and lower boundaries of soil organic matter accumulation by comparing this approach to positive (permanent ley, akin to conversion to permanent pasture) and negative (bare soil) references. Our findings in the 2-year diverse ley treatment show greater soil organic matter accumulation in plots with lower baseline levels, suggesting a potential plateau of carbon sequestration under this management practice. In contrast, the positive reference consistently showed a steady rate of organic matter accumulation regardless of baseline levels. Moreover, we observed a concurrent increase in labile carbon content in the 2-year ley treatment and positive reference, indicating improved soil nutrient cycling and ecological processes that facilitate soil carbon sequestration. Our results demonstrate that incorporating a 2-year diverse ley within arable rotations surpasses the COP21 global target of a 0.4% annual increase in soil organic carbon. These findings, derived from a working farm's practical and economic constraints, provide compelling evidence that productive arable agriculture can contribute to climate change mitigation efforts.
农业可以通过土壤固碳在减缓气候变化方面发挥关键作用。将土地转为牧场被认为是实现这一目标的最有效方法。然而,在增加土壤碳含量和维持耕地粮食作物产量之间,我们认为需要权衡利弊。在这项农场研究中,我们评估了在 7 年耕地轮作中种植 2 年多样化牧草(由 23 种豆科植物、草本植物和禾本科植物组成)以积累土壤有机质的潜力。我们将这种方法与正向参考(永久列岛,类似于转换为永久牧场)和负向参考(裸土)进行比较,从而确定了土壤有机质积累的上限和下限。我们在为期 2 年的多样化沥青处理中发现,基线水平较低的地块土壤有机质积累量更大,这表明在这种管理方法下可能会出现固碳高原。相比之下,无论基线水平如何,正参比始终显示出稳定的有机质积累速度。此外,我们还观察到,在 2 年 Ley 处理和正向参照中,可变碳含量同时增加,这表明土壤养分循环和生态过程得到改善,从而促进了土壤固碳。我们的研究结果表明,在耕地轮作中加入 2 年期的多样化ley 超过了 COP21 全球目标,即土壤有机碳每年增加 0.4%。这些研究结果源于一个工作农场的实际和经济限制因素,提供了令人信服的证据,证明生产性耕地农业可以为减缓气候变化做出贡献。
{"title":"Modern arable and diverse ley farming systems can increase soil organic matter faster than global targets","authors":"Richard Gantlett, Jacob Bishop, Hannah E. Jones, Martin Lukac","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000103","url":null,"abstract":"Agriculture can be pivotal in mitigating climate change through soil carbon sequestration. Land conversion to pasture has been identified as the most effective method to achieve this. Yet, it creates a perceived trade-off between increasing soil carbon and maintaining arable food crop production. In this on-farm study, we assessed the potential of incorporating a 2-year diverse ley (consisting of 23 species of legumes, herbs, and grasses) within a 7-year arable crop rotation for soil organic matter accumulation. We established upper and lower boundaries of soil organic matter accumulation by comparing this approach to positive (permanent ley, akin to conversion to permanent pasture) and negative (bare soil) references. Our findings in the 2-year diverse ley treatment show greater soil organic matter accumulation in plots with lower baseline levels, suggesting a potential plateau of carbon sequestration under this management practice. In contrast, the positive reference consistently showed a steady rate of organic matter accumulation regardless of baseline levels. Moreover, we observed a concurrent increase in labile carbon content in the 2-year ley treatment and positive reference, indicating improved soil nutrient cycling and ecological processes that facilitate soil carbon sequestration. Our results demonstrate that incorporating a 2-year diverse ley within arable rotations surpasses the COP21 global target of a 0.4% annual increase in soil organic carbon. These findings, derived from a working farm's practical and economic constraints, provide compelling evidence that productive arable agriculture can contribute to climate change mitigation efforts.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142250387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In the search for pastoral livestock systems that improve the meat quality: An exploratory study 寻找能提高肉质的畜牧系统:探索性研究
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000127
Carla Velásquez, David Cancino-Baier, John Quiñones-Diaz, Rodrigo Huaiquipan, Alex Muñoz, Néstor Sepúlveda Becker, Rommy Diaz, Erwin A. Paz, Lidiana Velázquez, Gastón Sepúlveda, Daniela Tapia, Fernanda Olivares
An increasing number of consumers are expressing concerns about the quality, nutrient content, and safety of the meet products they purchase, alongside animal welfare and the environmental footprint of production systems. Various studies show that grassland-based systems can produce a healthier meat product. In this context, livestock farmers are actively pursuing improvements in their systems focus on sustainability, with regenerative livestock farming emerging as a prominent approach. Most research has focused on showing the differences in the quality of meat comparing pastoral systems and those fed concentrates under controlled environments. However, there are no studies in Chile that evaluate the quality of beef derived from different pastoral systems, particularly those consider adequate data and products sourced directly from livestock sector. This study explores three beef production systems commonly used in southern Chile (conventional, free grazing, and regenerative), evaluating their impact on carcass characteristics, meat quality attributes, and nutritional components. The results show some variations in carcass weight and yield, with free grazing showing better results. Deviations in meat color were observed, with conventional meat being more red and yellow while regenerative meat was less bright. Subcutaneous fat color and water retention capacity were influenced by diet and production methods. Although lipid oxidation showed no differences, 100% grazing-based systems exhibited lower values, suggesting a higher intake of antioxidants. The research highlights the nutritional superiority of beef from grasslands, characterized by a lower intramuscular fat content and higher values of minerals, such as selenium. The complex multifactorial interaction of pastoral systems is also highlighted, impacting the carcass and meat quality. A holistic approach is essential in future research to generate and assess healthy beef.
越来越多的消费者开始关注他们购买的肉类产品的质量、营养成分和安全性,以及动物福利和生产系统对环境的影响。各种研究表明,以草地为基础的生产系统可以生产出更健康的肉类产品。在这种情况下,畜牧业者正积极改善其系统,注重可持续发展,而再生畜牧业正成为一种突出的方法。大多数研究都集中在显示牧业系统与在受控环境下喂养精饲料的系统在肉质上的差异。然而,智利还没有研究对不同牧业系统生产的牛肉质量进行评估,特别是那些考虑到充分数据和产品直接来自畜牧业的研究。本研究探讨了智利南部常用的三种牛肉生产系统(传统、自由放牧和再生),评估了它们对胴体特征、肉质属性和营养成分的影响。结果显示,胴体重量和产量存在一些差异,自由放牧的效果更好。肉的颜色也有差异,传统肉更红更黄,而再生肉则不那么鲜艳。皮下脂肪的颜色和保水能力受日粮和生产方式的影响。虽然脂质氧化没有显示出差异,但以 100%放牧为基础的系统显示出较低的值,表明抗氧化剂的摄入量较高。这项研究强调了草地牛肉的营养优势,其特点是肌肉内脂肪含量较低,硒等矿物质含量较高。研究还强调了牧业系统复杂的多因素相互作用对胴体和肉质的影响。在未来的研究中,必须采用综合方法来生产和评估健康牛肉。
{"title":"In the search for pastoral livestock systems that improve the meat quality: An exploratory study","authors":"Carla Velásquez, David Cancino-Baier, John Quiñones-Diaz, Rodrigo Huaiquipan, Alex Muñoz, Néstor Sepúlveda Becker, Rommy Diaz, Erwin A. Paz, Lidiana Velázquez, Gastón Sepúlveda, Daniela Tapia, Fernanda Olivares","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000127","url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of consumers are expressing concerns about the quality, nutrient content, and safety of the meet products they purchase, alongside animal welfare and the environmental footprint of production systems. Various studies show that grassland-based systems can produce a healthier meat product. In this context, livestock farmers are actively pursuing improvements in their systems focus on sustainability, with regenerative livestock farming emerging as a prominent approach. Most research has focused on showing the differences in the quality of meat comparing pastoral systems and those fed concentrates under controlled environments. However, there are no studies in Chile that evaluate the quality of beef derived from different pastoral systems, particularly those consider adequate data and products sourced directly from livestock sector. This study explores three beef production systems commonly used in southern Chile (conventional, free grazing, and regenerative), evaluating their impact on carcass characteristics, meat quality attributes, and nutritional components. The results show some variations in carcass weight and yield, with free grazing showing better results. Deviations in meat color were observed, with conventional meat being more red and yellow while regenerative meat was less bright. Subcutaneous fat color and water retention capacity were influenced by diet and production methods. Although lipid oxidation showed no differences, 100% grazing-based systems exhibited lower values, suggesting a higher intake of antioxidants. The research highlights the nutritional superiority of beef from grasslands, characterized by a lower intramuscular fat content and higher values of minerals, such as selenium. The complex multifactorial interaction of pastoral systems is also highlighted, impacting the carcass and meat quality. A holistic approach is essential in future research to generate and assess healthy beef.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"200 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142250383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the potential of sustainability turn in farming: review of sociotechnical adoption factors of agri-environmental cropping practices 了解农业可持续性转变的潜力:农业环境耕作方法的社会技术采用因素回顾
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000085
Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica, Mikelis Grivins
While farming practices such as intercropping, cover cropping, and green manuring are promoted as contributors to environment-friendly agriculture by balancing agricultural production with environmental sustainability, their uptake by farmers has still been limited. This paper provides a holistic global view of the adoption factors of such agri-environmental cropping practices based on a systematic literature review of 53 international peer-reviewed articles. Qualitative analysis of the reviewed studies shows that adoption factors explored by researchers can be categorized along nine thematic groups (sociodemographic characteristics, socioeconomic/financial conditions, environmental conditions, tangible assets and inventory, pre-existing farm practices, agrotechnical aspects of the practice, public support instruments, information and knowledge resources, community dynamics) and two transversal dimensions (generic and practice-specific attitudes), with an additional differentiation of micro- and macro-levels within the former. While many individual factors across the various groups and dimensions are highly context sensitive in terms of their impact on practice adoption, the analysis also identifies a set of factors that demonstrate common trends across the studies. The offered holistic conceptualization and analysis of the adoption factors of the reviewed set of practices contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the broader potential impact pathways in the farmer reorientation toward sustainable crop production.
虽然间作、覆盖种植和绿肥等耕作方法通过平衡农业生产与环境可持续性而被推广为环境友好型农业的促进因素,但农民对这些方法的采用仍然有限。本文在对 53 篇国际同行评审文章进行系统文献综述的基础上,对采用此类农业环境种植方法的因素进行了全面的全球审视。对综述研究的定性分析显示,研究人员探讨的采用因素可按九个专题组(社会人口特征、社会经济/财务条件、环境条件、有形资产和存货、已有的农业实践、实践的农业技术方面、公共支持工具、信息和知识资源、社区动态)和两个横向维度(一般态度和特定实践态度)进行分类,前者还包括微观和宏观层面的区别。虽然各组和各维度中的许多个别因素对实践采用的影响具有高度的背景敏感性,但分析也确定了一系列在各项研究中表现出共同趋势的因素。对所审查的一系列做法的采用因素进行整体概念化和分析,有助于更全面地了解农民调整方向实现可持续作物生产的更广泛的潜在影响途径。
{"title":"Understanding the potential of sustainability turn in farming: review of sociotechnical adoption factors of agri-environmental cropping practices","authors":"Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica, Mikelis Grivins","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000085","url":null,"abstract":"While farming practices such as intercropping, cover cropping, and green manuring are promoted as contributors to environment-friendly agriculture by balancing agricultural production with environmental sustainability, their uptake by farmers has still been limited. This paper provides a holistic global view of the adoption factors of such agri-environmental cropping practices based on a systematic literature review of 53 international peer-reviewed articles. Qualitative analysis of the reviewed studies shows that adoption factors explored by researchers can be categorized along nine thematic groups (sociodemographic characteristics, socioeconomic/financial conditions, environmental conditions, tangible assets and inventory, pre-existing farm practices, agrotechnical aspects of the practice, public support instruments, information and knowledge resources, community dynamics) and two transversal dimensions (generic and practice-specific attitudes), with an additional differentiation of micro- and macro-levels within the former. While many individual factors across the various groups and dimensions are highly context sensitive in terms of their impact on practice adoption, the analysis also identifies a set of factors that demonstrate common trends across the studies. The offered holistic conceptualization and analysis of the adoption factors of the reviewed set of practices contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the broader potential impact pathways in the farmer reorientation toward sustainable crop production.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140938705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Farmers’ resilience to climate change through the circular economy and sustainable agriculture: a review from developed and developing countries 通过循环经济和可持续农业提高农民抵御气候变化的能力:发达国家和发展中国家综述
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000097
Yahya Shafiyuddin Hilmi, József Tóth, Zoltán Gabnai, Gábor Király, Ágoston Temesi
Farmers struggle to combat uncertain climate issues while encountering pressure on conventional farming practices that lead to carbon emissions, water and soil pollution, and other environmental harms. A growing body of literature investigated circular economy and sustainable practices to support environmental-friendly agriculture activities while providing opportunities for farmers to improve their farm income. Therefore, a study synthesizing previous literature while identifying actual policy to boost farmers’ implementation of sustainable agriculture is worthwhile. Using the Systematic Literature Review analysis, this paper aims to identify farmers’ views on climate change adaptation and mitigation, challenges in implementing circular economy and sustainable practices, and policies to support farmers’ transition toward sustainable agriculture in developed and developing countries. We found that (1) farmers’ awareness of climate change, knowledge and skills are prominent for adapting and mitigating climate change in both types of countries, (2) farmland size, risks of income loss, and training and extension services influenced farmers’ adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change in developing countries, (3) farmers in both types of countries experienced uncertainty in economic profits and legislative issues when adopting sustainable practices, while farmers in developing countries issued significant up-front expenses to acquire technology to adopt sustainable practices, (4) financial access and incentives through policy can be valuable to develop sustainable livelihoods, especially for farm households.
农民们在努力应对不确定的气候问题的同时,也面临着传统耕作方式带来的压力,因为传统耕作方式会导致碳排放、水和土壤污染以及其他环境危害。越来越多的文献调查了循环经济和可持续实践,以支持环境友好型农业活动,同时为农民提供提高农业收入的机会。因此,有必要对以前的文献进行综合研究,同时确定促进农民实施可持续农业的实际政策。本文采用系统文献综述分析法,旨在确定发达国家和发展中国家农民对适应和减缓气候变化的看法、实施循环经济和可持续实践的挑战,以及支持农民向可持续农业转型的政策。我们发现:(1) 两类国家农民对气候变化的认识、知识和技能在适应和减缓气候变化方面都很突出;(2) 发展中国家农民的耕地面积、收入损失风险以及培训和推广服务影响了他们对气候变化的适应和减缓策略、(3) 这两类国家的农民在采用可持续做法时都经历了经济收益的不确定性和立法问题,而发展中国家的农民则为获得采用可持续做法的技术支付了大量的前期费用,(4) 通过政策获得资金和激励措施对于发展可持续生计,尤其是农户的可持续生计具有重要价值。
{"title":"Farmers’ resilience to climate change through the circular economy and sustainable agriculture: a review from developed and developing countries","authors":"Yahya Shafiyuddin Hilmi, József Tóth, Zoltán Gabnai, Gábor Király, Ágoston Temesi","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000097","url":null,"abstract":"Farmers struggle to combat uncertain climate issues while encountering pressure on conventional farming practices that lead to carbon emissions, water and soil pollution, and other environmental harms. A growing body of literature investigated circular economy and sustainable practices to support environmental-friendly agriculture activities while providing opportunities for farmers to improve their farm income. Therefore, a study synthesizing previous literature while identifying actual policy to boost farmers’ implementation of sustainable agriculture is worthwhile. Using the Systematic Literature Review analysis, this paper aims to identify farmers’ views on climate change adaptation and mitigation, challenges in implementing circular economy and sustainable practices, and policies to support farmers’ transition toward sustainable agriculture in developed and developing countries. We found that (1) farmers’ awareness of climate change, knowledge and skills are prominent for adapting and mitigating climate change in both types of countries, (2) farmland size, risks of income loss, and training and extension services influenced farmers’ adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change in developing countries, (3) farmers in both types of countries experienced uncertainty in economic profits and legislative issues when adopting sustainable practices, while farmers in developing countries issued significant up-front expenses to acquire technology to adopt sustainable practices, (4) financial access and incentives through policy can be valuable to develop sustainable livelihoods, especially for farm households.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140938298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Strategies to overcome stagnation in agricultural adoption despite awareness and interest: a case study of conservation agriculture in South Asia 克服在提高认识和兴趣的情况下农业应用停滞不前的战略:南亚保护性农业案例研究
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000073
E. Karki, A. Sharma, P. Timsina, A. Chaudhary, R. Sharma, B. Brown
The Eastern Gangetic Plains are a densely populated region of South Asia with comparatively low productivity yet a strong potential to intensify production to meet growing food demands. Conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification (CASI) has gained academic and policy traction in the region, yet despite considerable promotional activities, uptake remains limited. Based on emerging evidence delving beyond a binary classification of adoption, this qualitative study seeks to explore the experiences and perspectives of smallholder farmers who express positive sentiments about CASI, yet have not progressed to (autonomous) adoption. After thematic coding of semi-structured interviews with 44 experimenting farmers and 38 interested non-users, ten common themes emerged that explain why farmers stagnate in their adoption process. Seven of the ten themes were non-specific to CASI and would constraint promotion and uptake of any agri-system change, highlighting the need for contextual clarity when promoting practice changes in smallholder systems. We summaries this to propose the ‘four T's’ that are required to be addressed to enable agricultural change in smallholder systems: Targeting; Training; Targeted incentives; and Time. Through this more nuanced evaluation approach, we argue the need for a stronger focus on enabling environments rather than technological performance evaluations generically, if promotional efforts are to be successful and emerging sustainable intensification technologies are to be adopted by smallholder farmers.
东恒河平原是南亚的一个人口稠密地区,生产力相对较低,但却具有很大的集约化生产潜力,以满足日益增长的粮食需求。以保护性农业为基础的可持续集约化(CASI)已在该地区获得了学术和政策上的支持,然而,尽管开展了大量推广活动,采用率仍然有限。本定性研究基于新出现的证据,超越了采用的二元分类,旨在探讨对保护性农业可持续集约化表示积极态度但尚未(自主)采用的小农的经验和观点。在对 44 位实验农户和 38 位感兴趣的非用户进行半结构式访谈后,对访谈内容进行了主题编码,得出了十个共同主题,解释了农户在采用过程中停滞不前的原因。这 10 个主题中有 7 个与 CASI 无关,它们将制约任何农业系统变革的推广和吸收,这突出表明在小农系统中推广实践变革时需要明确背景情况。我们对此进行了总结,提出了促进小农系统农业变革所需的 "四个 T":目标、培训、有针对性的激励措施和时间。通过这种更加细致入微的评估方法,我们认为,要想使推广工作取得成功,使新兴的可持续集约化技术被小农采用,就必须更加注重有利的环境,而不是笼统地进行技术绩效评估。
{"title":"Strategies to overcome stagnation in agricultural adoption despite awareness and interest: a case study of conservation agriculture in South Asia","authors":"E. Karki, A. Sharma, P. Timsina, A. Chaudhary, R. Sharma, B. Brown","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000073","url":null,"abstract":"The Eastern Gangetic Plains are a densely populated region of South Asia with comparatively low productivity yet a strong potential to intensify production to meet growing food demands. Conservation agriculture-based sustainable intensification (CASI) has gained academic and policy traction in the region, yet despite considerable promotional activities, uptake remains limited. Based on emerging evidence delving beyond a binary classification of adoption, this qualitative study seeks to explore the experiences and perspectives of smallholder farmers who express positive sentiments about CASI, yet have not progressed to (autonomous) adoption. After thematic coding of semi-structured interviews with 44 experimenting farmers and 38 interested non-users, ten common themes emerged that explain why farmers stagnate in their adoption process. Seven of the ten themes were non-specific to CASI and would constraint promotion and uptake of any agri-system change, highlighting the need for contextual clarity when promoting practice changes in smallholder systems. We summaries this to propose the ‘four T's’ that are required to be addressed to enable agricultural change in smallholder systems: Targeting; Training; Targeted incentives; and Time. Through this more nuanced evaluation approach, we argue the need for a stronger focus on enabling environments rather than technological performance evaluations generically, if promotional efforts are to be successful and emerging sustainable intensification technologies are to be adopted by smallholder farmers.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140798144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of agroecological practices on farm performance in Botswana 生态农业实践对博茨瓦纳农场绩效的影响
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000036
Obakeng Tevin Selelo, Gideon Danso-Abbeam, Abiodun A. Ogundeji
Despite the potential of agroecological practices to promote sustainable agrifood systems, their adoption among farmers is limited, and there is insufficient information regarding their impact on farm performance. This study evaluates the adoption of agroecological practices and their impact on farm performance among vegetable farmers in Botswana. The multivariate probit model was used to understand the complementarity and/or substitutability of the key agroecological practices under consideration—mulching, cover cropping, afforestation, and minimum tillage, as well as their determinants. Furthermore, the direct two-stage least squares (direct-2sls) technique within the framework of instrumental variable treatment effect regression (ivtreatreg) was used to eliminate self-selection bias that may be evident as a result of observed and unobserved characteristics. The results indicated that the agroecological practices are complementary and that the practice of one agroecology is conditional on another. The factors shaping the adoption of these agroecological practices vary among them. Furthermore, the adoption of agroecological practices led to a significant improvement in farmers' net revenue and yield, and farmers that did not adopt any of the practices would have been better off if they had adopted them. These findings have significant implications for stakeholders and will boost the campaign for the adoption of agroecological practices to improve farm performance and, consequently, farmers' welfare.
尽管生态农业实践具有促进可持续农粮系统的潜力,但农民采用这些实践的情况却很有限,有关其对农场绩效影响的信息也不充分。本研究评估了博茨瓦纳菜农采用生态农业实践的情况及其对农场绩效的影响。本研究采用多元 probit 模型来了解所考虑的主要生态农业措施(覆膜、覆盖种植、植树造林和最小耕作)的互补性和/或替代性及其决定因素。此外,还在工具变量处理效应回归(ivtreatreg)框架内使用了直接两阶段最小二乘法(direct-2sls)技术,以消除因观察到的和未观察到的特征而可能出现的自我选择偏差。结果表明,生态农业实践具有互补性,一种生态农业实践以另一种为条件。影响采用这些生态农业做法的因素各不相同。此外,采用生态农业做法可显著提高农民的净收入和产量,而未采用任何生态农业做法的农民如果采用这些做法,情况会更好。这些研究结果对利益相关者具有重要意义,并将推动采用生态农业实践的运动,以提高农场绩效,进而改善农民福利。
{"title":"Impact of agroecological practices on farm performance in Botswana","authors":"Obakeng Tevin Selelo, Gideon Danso-Abbeam, Abiodun A. Ogundeji","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000036","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the potential of agroecological practices to promote sustainable agrifood systems, their adoption among farmers is limited, and there is insufficient information regarding their impact on farm performance. This study evaluates the adoption of agroecological practices and their impact on farm performance among vegetable farmers in Botswana. The multivariate probit model was used to understand the complementarity and/or substitutability of the key agroecological practices under consideration—mulching, cover cropping, afforestation, and minimum tillage, as well as their determinants. Furthermore, the direct two-stage least squares (direct-2sls) technique within the framework of instrumental variable treatment effect regression (<jats:italic>ivtreatreg</jats:italic>) was used to eliminate self-selection bias that may be evident as a result of observed and unobserved characteristics. The results indicated that the agroecological practices are complementary and that the practice of one agroecology is conditional on another. The factors shaping the adoption of these agroecological practices vary among them. Furthermore, the adoption of agroecological practices led to a significant improvement in farmers' net revenue and yield, and farmers that did not adopt any of the practices would have been better off if they had adopted them. These findings have significant implications for stakeholders and will boost the campaign for the adoption of agroecological practices to improve farm performance and, consequently, farmers' welfare.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"181 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140615110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving conservation agriculture from principles to a performance-based production system 将保护性农业从原则转变为基于绩效的生产系统
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000048
Stéphane Cordeau
Conservation agriculture (CA) is an approach to farming that is defined by three principles: (1) minimal soil disturbance (no-till), (2) crop diversity in time and space, and (3) soil coverage by crop residues and/or cover crops. These principles provide a roadmap to protect and improve soil. However, the narrow criteria for defining CA may fail to account for tradeoffs between soil health and other ecosystem services. A literature review of meta-analyses dealing with CA and an online survey in France were conducted to explore the implementation and performances of CA. Research on CA systems has focused on crop productivity and soil quality whereas research on other dimensions of cropping system sustainability are lacking. The effects of CA on other aspects of sustainability such as biodiversity and profitability are less prevalent in the literature. The online survey results show that 63% of respondents thought that CA helps reduce pesticide use, 91% that CA improves water use efficiency, and 77% that CA helps to store carbon and achieve the objectives of the 4 per 1000 international initiative. Given the prevalence and widespread support for CA, we advocate for moving CA from its current definition based on the means toward a definition that includes performance-based metrics that address different ecosystem services. CA has potential to help address challenges associated with climate change, biodiversity loss, and water pollution, but opportunities may be missed without developing performance targets that go beyond soil conservation.
保护性农业(CA)是一种耕作方法,有三个原则:(1) 尽量减少对土壤的扰动(免耕),(2) 作物在时间和空间上的多样性,以及 (3) 作物残茬和/或覆盖作物对土壤的覆盖。这些原则为保护和改良土壤提供了路线图。然而,定义 CA 的狭隘标准可能无法考虑土壤健康与其他生态系统服务之间的权衡。我们对有关 CA 的元分析进行了文献综述,并在法国进行了在线调查,以探讨 CA 的实施情况和性能。有关 CA 系统的研究主要集中在作物产量和土壤质量方面,而对种植系统可持续性的其他方面则缺乏研究。有关 CA 对生物多样性和盈利能力等其他可持续性方面的影响的文献较少。在线调查结果显示,63% 的受访者认为 CA 有助于减少农药使用,91% 的受访者认为 CA 提高了用水效率,77% 的受访者认为 CA 有助于碳储存和实现千分之四国际倡议的目标。鉴于 CA 的普遍性和广泛支持,我们主张将 CA 从目前基于手段的定义转变为包括针对不同生态系统服务的基于绩效的指标的定义。CA 有潜力帮助应对与气候变化、生物多样性丧失和水污染相关的挑战,但如果不制定超越土壤保持的绩效目标,可能会错失良机。
{"title":"Moving conservation agriculture from principles to a performance-based production system","authors":"Stéphane Cordeau","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000048","url":null,"abstract":"Conservation agriculture (CA) is an approach to farming that is defined by three principles: (1) minimal soil disturbance (no-till), (2) crop diversity in time and space, and (3) soil coverage by crop residues and/or cover crops. These principles provide a roadmap to protect and improve soil. However, the narrow criteria for defining CA may fail to account for tradeoffs between soil health and other ecosystem services. A literature review of meta-analyses dealing with CA and an online survey in France were conducted to explore the implementation and performances of CA. Research on CA systems has focused on crop productivity and soil quality whereas research on other dimensions of cropping system sustainability are lacking. The effects of CA on other aspects of sustainability such as biodiversity and profitability are less prevalent in the literature. The online survey results show that 63% of respondents thought that CA helps reduce pesticide use, 91% that CA improves water use efficiency, and 77% that CA helps to store carbon and achieve the objectives of the 4 per 1000 international initiative. Given the prevalence and widespread support for CA, we advocate for moving CA from its current definition based on the means toward a definition that includes performance-based metrics that address different ecosystem services. CA has potential to help address challenges associated with climate change, biodiversity loss, and water pollution, but opportunities may be missed without developing performance targets that go beyond soil conservation.","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140156430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding sustained adoption of conservation agriculture among smallholder farmers: insights from a sentinel site in Malawi 了解小农持续采用保护性农业的情况:马拉维一个哨点的启示
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000061
Innocent Pangapanga-Phiri, Hambulo Ngoma, Christian Thierfelder

Smallholder farming systems need climate-proofing and sustainable intensification practices such as conservation agriculture (CA), are promising options. However, there is a general perception that the adoption of CA systems in southern Africa is low. Sentinel sites, where CA has been promoted for a long time, offer forward-looking new insights. This paper, thus, takes a deep dive at Nkhotakota district of Malawi to understand what could have led to the success of CA promotion and subsequent perceived high adoption. We use survey data from 620 farmers, with 298 farmers sampled from treatment areas – known to have had contact with host farmers and 320 from a control group. Overall, 31% of the farmers in both groups adopted full CA over at least a 2-year period. We also find that about 57% of farmers in the treatment area adopted full CA and only 7% of farmers in the control areas. This highlights that longer-term CA promotion with dedicated extension support can enhance the uptake of CA practices. In essence, this paper offers a different perspective to the current narrative that CA systems are too complex and knowledge intensive to be adopted despite its long-term promotion and significant investments. However, there are some nuances: sustained adoption even in sentinel sites is neither 100% nor persistent over the long term. We find an appreciable adoption decay, showing large declines from highs of 57 and 7% in adoption for at least 2 years for treatment and control, respectively, to 12% in the treatment group and practically zero in the control when we condition full CA adoption to at least 7 years. This means that fewer farmers adopted CA for a longer period and suggests some dis-adoption over time even in sentinel sites. The key adoption enablers in the sentinel sites include the availability of training, dedicated longer-term extension support coupled with farmer experiential learning through demonstration plots managed by host farmers. Based on our findings, there is need to consistently promote CA using farmer-centric approaches that include peer-to-peer learning over long periods. This allows farmers time to experiment with different CA options, enable behavioral and lasting change. At policy level, there is need to build and strengthen farmer groups to facilitate easier access to inputs like leguminous crop seeds for farmers practicing CA and to offer market-smart incentives to induce initial adoption in the short term to facilitate sustained adoption.

小农耕作制度需要不受气候影响,而保护性农业(CA)等可持续集约化做法是很有前途的选择。然而,人们普遍认为保护性农业系统在南部非洲的采用率很低。长期推广保护性农业的哨点提供了前瞻性的新见解。因此,本文对马拉维的恩科塔科塔地区进行了深入研究,以了解是什么原因导致了 CA 推广的成功和随后的高采用率。我们使用了来自 620 位农民的调查数据,其中 298 位农民来自治疗区(已知曾与接待农民有过接触),320 位来自对照组。总体而言,两组中均有 31% 的农民在至少两年的时间里全面采用了 CA。我们还发现,治疗区约有 57% 的农民全面采用了 CA,而对照区只有 7%。这突出表明,在专门的推广支持下进行较长期的 CA 推广可以提高 CA 实践的采用率。从根本上说,本文提供了一个不同于当前观点的视角,即尽管 CA 系统得到了长期推广并投入了大量资金,但其过于复杂且知识密集,因此难以被采用。不过,也有一些细微差别:即使在哨点地区,持续采用也不是 100% 或长期持续的。我们发现采用率出现了明显的衰减,当我们将完全采用 CA 至少 7 年作为条件时,治疗组和对照组采用 CA 至少 2 年的比例分别从 57% 和 7% 的高点大幅下降到 12%,而对照组则几乎为零。这意味着较少的农民在更长的时间内采用了 CA,并表明即使在哨点也有一些农民随着时间的推移而不再采用 CA。在哨点地区,关键的促进因素包括培训、长期的专门推广支持,以及农民通过由当地农民管理的示范田进行的经验学习。根据我们的研究结果,有必要持续推广以农民为中心的 CA 方法,其中包括长期的同行学习。这样,农民就有时间尝试不同的 CA 方案,从而实现行为和持久的改变。在政策层面,有必要建立和加强农民团体,以方便实践 CA 的农民获得豆科作物种子等投入,并提供市场明智的激励措施,在短期内诱导初步采用,以促进持续采用。
{"title":"Understanding sustained adoption of conservation agriculture among smallholder farmers: insights from a sentinel site in Malawi","authors":"Innocent Pangapanga-Phiri, Hambulo Ngoma, Christian Thierfelder","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000061","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smallholder farming systems need climate-proofing and sustainable intensification practices such as conservation agriculture (CA), are promising options. However, there is a general perception that the adoption of CA systems in southern Africa is low. Sentinel sites, where CA has been promoted for a long time, offer forward-looking new insights. This paper, thus, takes a deep dive at Nkhotakota district of Malawi to understand what could have led to the success of CA promotion and subsequent perceived high adoption. We use survey data from 620 farmers, with 298 farmers sampled from treatment areas – known to have had contact with host farmers and 320 from a control group. Overall, 31% of the farmers in both groups adopted full CA over at least a 2-year period. We also find that about 57% of farmers in the treatment area adopted full CA and only 7% of farmers in the control areas. This highlights that longer-term CA promotion with dedicated extension support can enhance the uptake of CA practices. In essence, this paper offers a different perspective to the current narrative that CA systems are too complex and knowledge intensive to be adopted despite its long-term promotion and significant investments. However, there are some nuances: sustained adoption even in sentinel sites is neither 100% nor persistent over the long term. We find an appreciable adoption decay, showing large declines from highs of 57 and 7% in adoption for at least 2 years for treatment and control, respectively, to 12% in the treatment group and practically zero in the control when we condition full CA adoption to at least 7 years. This means that fewer farmers adopted CA for a longer period and suggests some dis-adoption over time even in sentinel sites. The key adoption enablers in the sentinel sites include the availability of training, dedicated longer-term extension support coupled with farmer experiential learning through demonstration plots managed by host farmers. Based on our findings, there is need to consistently promote CA using farmer-centric approaches that include peer-to-peer learning over long periods. This allows farmers time to experiment with different CA options, enable behavioral and lasting change. At policy level, there is need to build and strengthen farmer groups to facilitate easier access to inputs like leguminous crop seeds for farmers practicing CA and to offer market-smart incentives to induce initial adoption in the short term to facilitate sustained adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140106442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating pastured meat chickens into organic vegetable production increased nitrogen and microbial biomass with variability in presence of E. coli and Salmonella spp 将牧养肉鸡纳入有机蔬菜生产,增加了氮和微生物生物量,但大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的存在有变化
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170524000012
Moriah T. Bilenky, Ajay Nair, Marshall D. McDaniel, Angela M. Shaw, Elizabeth A. Bobeck, Kathleen Delate
<p>Integrating animals into a farm supports a closed or semi-closed production system where nutrients are recycled and off-farm inputs are reduced. In comparison to other livestock, chickens can be a low-investment option for animal-crop integration of small-scale, diversified, vegetable farms. Although crop-animal integration poses many potential benefits to farms, soils, and the environment, there are significant food safety risks when considering the production of vegetables in close proximity to raw manure. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of poultry integration with meat chickens (broilers) in two different seasons on soil health, food safety, vegetable yield, and poultry feed efficiency in organic vegetable cropping systems. We explored these effects in an open field study with three rotation treatments (two that integrated chickens and a no-chicken control): vegetables-cover crop (V-CC; control treatment), vegetables-cover crop-poultry (V-CC-P), and vegetables-poultry-cover crop (V-P-CC). In response to crop rotation, over three years, we monitored soil nutrient status, soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), and microbial catabolic potential and diversity using Biolog® microplates. The presence or absence of foodborne pathogens in soil and vegetables was also measured. Nitrate–nitrogen (NO<span>3</span>–N) was higher in V-P-CC in year 2 as compared to both V-CC and V-CC-P (<span>P</span> = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). After poultry removal in the summer of year 2 and year 3 V-P-CC was on average two times higher in NO<span>3</span>–N as compared to V-CC and V-CC-P, respectively. After chicken removal in the autumn of year 3 V-CC-P was 2.1 and 1.8 times higher in NO<span>3</span>–N as compared to V-CC and V-P-CC, respectively. On average phosphorus (P) increased by 45% in year 2 and by 13.2% in year 3. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) increased from after harvest (summer) in year 1 to the end of the season (autumn) of year 2 from 219.75 to 303.23 mg carbon (C) kg<span>−1</span>. Integrating poultry increased MBC by 25%, on average between both treatments across all sampling dates, compared to the V-CC (<span>P</span> = 0.042). The vegetable-cover crop control (V-CC) preferentially used carbohydrates, compared to V-P-CC which corresponded to greater amino acid usage. <span>Escherichia coli</span> O157:H7 was detected in all plots in the spring of year 3 and select replications of plots in the autumn of year 3. <span>Salmonella</span> spp. was found in one plot in year 2. No pathogens were detected on the spinach crop when leaf surfaces were tested. Integrating chickens into organic vegetable crop rotations increases NO<span>3</span>–N and has the potential for off-farm fertilizer reductions if time and stocking density are further examined. However, poultry feed is often an off-farm input and should be considered when determining the true N input of this system. Soil health ma
将动物融入农场可支持封闭或半封闭的生产系统,使养分得到循环利用,减少农场外的投入。与其他牲畜相比,鸡是小规模、多样化蔬菜农场动物-作物一体化的低投资选择。虽然作物-动物一体化对农场、土壤和环境有许多潜在益处,但考虑到蔬菜生产与生鲜粪便的距离很近,因此存在很大的食品安全风险。本研究的目的是考察有机蔬菜种植系统中家禽与肉鸡(肉鸡)在两个不同季节的融合对土壤健康、食品安全、蔬菜产量和家禽饲料效率的影响。我们在一项露天田间研究中探讨了这些影响,该研究采用了三种轮作处理(两种结合养鸡处理和一种无鸡对照处理):蔬菜-覆盖作物(V-CC;对照处理)、蔬菜-覆盖作物-家禽(V-CC-P)和蔬菜-家禽-覆盖作物(V-P-CC)。针对轮作,我们在三年内使用 Biolog® 微孔板监测了土壤养分状况、土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)、高锰酸盐氧化碳(POXC)以及微生物分解潜力和多样性。此外,还测量了土壤和蔬菜中是否存在食源性病原体。与 V-CC 和 V-CC-P 相比,第 2 年 V-P-CC 中的硝态氮(NO3-N)较高(P = 0.001 和 <0.001)。第 2 年和第 3 年夏季清除家禽后,V-P-CC 的 NO3-N 平均值分别是 V-CC 和 V-CC-P 的两倍。第 3 年秋季移走家禽后,V-CC-P 的 NO3-N 分别是 V-CC 和 V-P-CC 的 2.1 倍和 1.8 倍。磷(P)在第 2 年平均增加了 45%,在第 3 年平均增加了 13.2%。从第 1 年收获后(夏季)到第 2 年季节结束(秋季),微生物生物量碳(MBC)从 219.75 毫克碳(C)/千克增加到 303.23 毫克碳(C)/千克。与 V-CC 相比,在所有采样日期的两个处理中,家禽的加入使 MBC 平均增加了 25%(P = 0.042)。与 V-P-CC 相比,蔬菜-覆盖作物对照(V-CC)优先使用碳水化合物,而 V-P-CC 则更多地使用氨基酸。第 3 年春季,在所有地块中检测到大肠杆菌 O157:H7,第 3 年秋季,在部分重复地块中检测到大肠杆菌 O157:H7。第 2 年在一块地里发现了沙门氏菌。在对菠菜叶面进行检测时,未在菠菜作物上检测到病原体。在有机蔬菜轮作中养鸡可增加氮氧化物(NO3-N),如果进一步研究养鸡时间和饲养密度,有可能减少农场外的化肥用量。不过,家禽饲料通常是农场外的投入,在确定该系统的真正氮投入时应加以考虑。土壤健康可能会得到改善,但在长期轮作时应监测多溴联苯和其他土壤健康指标。将鸡纳入蔬菜生产会带来食品安全风险,应将田地当作施用了生粪肥处理。尽管将家禽与蔬菜作物轮作有潜在的好处,但仍需要对这些系统进行更多的研究,以确定能为生产者、动物和环境带来最大利益的最佳整合策略。
{"title":"Integrating pastured meat chickens into organic vegetable production increased nitrogen and microbial biomass with variability in presence of E. coli and Salmonella spp","authors":"Moriah T. Bilenky, Ajay Nair, Marshall D. McDaniel, Angela M. Shaw, Elizabeth A. Bobeck, Kathleen Delate","doi":"10.1017/s1742170524000012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170524000012","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Integrating animals into a farm supports a closed or semi-closed production system where nutrients are recycled and off-farm inputs are reduced. In comparison to other livestock, chickens can be a low-investment option for animal-crop integration of small-scale, diversified, vegetable farms. Although crop-animal integration poses many potential benefits to farms, soils, and the environment, there are significant food safety risks when considering the production of vegetables in close proximity to raw manure. The objectives of this study were to examine the effects of poultry integration with meat chickens (broilers) in two different seasons on soil health, food safety, vegetable yield, and poultry feed efficiency in organic vegetable cropping systems. We explored these effects in an open field study with three rotation treatments (two that integrated chickens and a no-chicken control): vegetables-cover crop (V-CC; control treatment), vegetables-cover crop-poultry (V-CC-P), and vegetables-poultry-cover crop (V-P-CC). In response to crop rotation, over three years, we monitored soil nutrient status, soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), and microbial catabolic potential and diversity using Biolog® microplates. The presence or absence of foodborne pathogens in soil and vegetables was also measured. Nitrate–nitrogen (NO&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;–N) was higher in V-P-CC in year 2 as compared to both V-CC and V-CC-P (&lt;span&gt;P&lt;/span&gt; = 0.001 and &lt;0.001, respectively). After poultry removal in the summer of year 2 and year 3 V-P-CC was on average two times higher in NO&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;–N as compared to V-CC and V-CC-P, respectively. After chicken removal in the autumn of year 3 V-CC-P was 2.1 and 1.8 times higher in NO&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;–N as compared to V-CC and V-P-CC, respectively. On average phosphorus (P) increased by 45% in year 2 and by 13.2% in year 3. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) increased from after harvest (summer) in year 1 to the end of the season (autumn) of year 2 from 219.75 to 303.23 mg carbon (C) kg&lt;span&gt;−1&lt;/span&gt;. Integrating poultry increased MBC by 25%, on average between both treatments across all sampling dates, compared to the V-CC (&lt;span&gt;P&lt;/span&gt; = 0.042). The vegetable-cover crop control (V-CC) preferentially used carbohydrates, compared to V-P-CC which corresponded to greater amino acid usage. &lt;span&gt;Escherichia coli&lt;/span&gt; O157:H7 was detected in all plots in the spring of year 3 and select replications of plots in the autumn of year 3. &lt;span&gt;Salmonella&lt;/span&gt; spp. was found in one plot in year 2. No pathogens were detected on the spinach crop when leaf surfaces were tested. Integrating chickens into organic vegetable crop rotations increases NO&lt;span&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;–N and has the potential for off-farm fertilizer reductions if time and stocking density are further examined. However, poultry feed is often an off-farm input and should be considered when determining the true N input of this system. Soil health ma","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140106542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing forage research and education needs of organic dairy farms in the United States 评估美国有机奶牛场的饲草研究和教育需求
IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI: 10.1017/s1742170523000455
Eric Hatungimana, Heather M. Darby, Kathy J. Soder, Sara E. Ziegler, Andre F. Brito, Lisa Kissing Kucek, Heathcliffe Riday, E. Charles Brummer

The viability of organic dairy operations in the United States (US) relies on forage production. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess producer and farm information regarding current forage production practices and producer knowledge gaps and (2) identify forage research and educational needs of organic dairy producers across the US. A survey was distributed to 643 organic dairy producers across the US, with 165 respondents (26% response rate). A focus group consisting of extension professionals, university researchers and staff, consultants, dairy industry representatives and organic dairy producers was also consulted for forage research needs. Results showed that approximately half (51%) of surveyed producers were somewhat satisfied with their forage production systems and sometimes experienced negative weather-related impacts on forage yield and quality. A majority (64%) of producers felt their knowledge to meet farm goals was adequate but they reported a lack of resources to implement this knowledge especially for balancing high-forage diets and selecting soil amendments. This study revealed that 54% of producers rely on peer experiences as information resources to make decisions on forage programs. Producer knowledge gaps included pasture renovation with reduced or no-tillage, forage mixtures that match their needs, and forage management practices aiming for high-quality forage. Based on the survey and focus group findings, forage research and educational activities should foster climate change resilience regarding forage diversity adapted to local and regional climatic conditions, improve forage quality, enhance economic returns from soil fertility amendments and pasture renovation, and introduce new forages and forage mixtures that suit economical, agronomical, and environmental needs.

美国有机奶牛场的生存依赖于饲草生产。本研究的目标是:(1) 评估生产者和牧场有关当前饲草生产实践和生产者知识差距的信息;(2) 确定全美有机奶制品生产者的饲草研究和教育需求。本研究向全美 643 位有机奶制品生产者发放了调查问卷,共有 165 位受访者(回复率为 26%)。此外,还就饲草研究需求咨询了由推广专业人员、大学研究人员和工作人员、顾问、乳制品行业代表和有机乳制品生产商组成的焦点小组。调查结果显示,约有一半(51%)的受访生产者对其饲草生产系统略感满意,但有时会遇到与天气有关的对饲草产量和质量的负面影响。大多数(64%)生产者认为他们掌握了足够的知识来实现农场目标,但他们表示缺乏资源来实施这些知识,尤其是在平衡高饲草日粮和选择土壤改良剂方面。这项研究显示,54% 的生产者依靠同行的经验作为信息资源,对饲草计划做出决策。生产者的知识差距包括减少或免耕的牧场改造、符合其需求的饲草混合物以及旨在获得优质饲草的饲草管理方法。根据调查和焦点小组的结论,牧草研究和教育活动应促进适应气候变化的能力,使牧草多样性适应当地和区域气候条件,提高牧草质量,增加土壤肥力改良和牧场翻新的经济收益,并引进适合经济、农艺和环境需求的新牧草和牧草混合物。
{"title":"Assessing forage research and education needs of organic dairy farms in the United States","authors":"Eric Hatungimana, Heather M. Darby, Kathy J. Soder, Sara E. Ziegler, Andre F. Brito, Lisa Kissing Kucek, Heathcliffe Riday, E. Charles Brummer","doi":"10.1017/s1742170523000455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170523000455","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The viability of organic dairy operations in the United States (US) relies on forage production. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess producer and farm information regarding current forage production practices and producer knowledge gaps and (2) identify forage research and educational needs of organic dairy producers across the US. A survey was distributed to 643 organic dairy producers across the US, with 165 respondents (26% response rate). A focus group consisting of extension professionals, university researchers and staff, consultants, dairy industry representatives and organic dairy producers was also consulted for forage research needs. Results showed that approximately half (51%) of surveyed producers were somewhat satisfied with their forage production systems and sometimes experienced negative weather-related impacts on forage yield and quality. A majority (64%) of producers felt their knowledge to meet farm goals was adequate but they reported a lack of resources to implement this knowledge especially for balancing high-forage diets and selecting soil amendments. This study revealed that 54% of producers rely on peer experiences as information resources to make decisions on forage programs. Producer knowledge gaps included pasture renovation with reduced or no-tillage, forage mixtures that match their needs, and forage management practices aiming for high-quality forage. Based on the survey and focus group findings, forage research and educational activities should foster climate change resilience regarding forage diversity adapted to local and regional climatic conditions, improve forage quality, enhance economic returns from soil fertility amendments and pasture renovation, and introduce new forages and forage mixtures that suit economical, agronomical, and environmental needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54495,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140054540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1