The environmental performance of agricultural production trusteeship from the perspective of planting carbon emissions

IF 4.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY China Agricultural Economic Review Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1108/caer-01-2023-0016
Lijuan Zhao, Yan Liu, Junhong Shi
{"title":"The environmental performance of agricultural production trusteeship from the perspective of planting carbon emissions","authors":"Lijuan Zhao, Yan Liu, Junhong Shi","doi":"10.1108/caer-01-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose In the context of carbon peaking and neutrality, effectively controlling agricultural carbon emissions has gained academic attention. As an essential form of agricultural service scale management, this study investigates whether and how trusteeship affects the carbon emission behavior in planting production. Design/methodology/approach The authors established a theoretical framework to analyze the impact of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting. China's provincial panel data in the 2012–2021 period were selected to test the impact, mechanisms and heterogeneity of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting using the bidirectional fixed effect model and the panel correction standard error regression model. Findings The findings indicate that agricultural production trusteeship significantly inhibits carbon emissions from planting, especially in the dimensions of fertilizer input, pesticide application, agricultural film use and mechanical fuel. Agricultural production trusteeship primarily affects the intensity of these carbon emissions through contiguous farmland management and planting structure adjustment. Further examinations revealed that the influence of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting was heterogeneous with respect to geographical location, proportion of non-farming income and scale of agricultural production. Originality/value This study is the first to systematically evaluate the impact of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting.","PeriodicalId":10095,"journal":{"name":"China Agricultural Economic Review","volume":"70 9-10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Agricultural Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-01-2023-0016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose In the context of carbon peaking and neutrality, effectively controlling agricultural carbon emissions has gained academic attention. As an essential form of agricultural service scale management, this study investigates whether and how trusteeship affects the carbon emission behavior in planting production. Design/methodology/approach The authors established a theoretical framework to analyze the impact of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting. China's provincial panel data in the 2012–2021 period were selected to test the impact, mechanisms and heterogeneity of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting using the bidirectional fixed effect model and the panel correction standard error regression model. Findings The findings indicate that agricultural production trusteeship significantly inhibits carbon emissions from planting, especially in the dimensions of fertilizer input, pesticide application, agricultural film use and mechanical fuel. Agricultural production trusteeship primarily affects the intensity of these carbon emissions through contiguous farmland management and planting structure adjustment. Further examinations revealed that the influence of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting was heterogeneous with respect to geographical location, proportion of non-farming income and scale of agricultural production. Originality/value This study is the first to systematically evaluate the impact of agricultural production trusteeship on carbon emissions from planting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从种植碳排放的角度看农业生产托管的环境绩效
在碳调峰和碳中和的背景下,有效控制农业碳排放已受到学术界的关注。作为农业服务规模经营的一种重要形式,本研究探讨了托管制度是否以及如何影响种植生产中的碳排放行为。设计/方法/方法作者建立了一个理论框架来分析农业生产托管对种植碳排放的影响。选取2012-2021年中国省级面板数据,采用双向固定效应模型和面板修正标准差回归模型,检验农业生产托管对种植碳排放的影响、机制和异质性。研究发现,农业生产托管显著抑制种植碳排放,尤其是在肥料投入、农药施用、农膜使用和机械燃料四个维度上。农业生产托管主要通过连片耕地经营和种植结构调整来影响碳排放强度。进一步研究发现,农业生产托管对种植碳排放的影响在地理位置、非农收入占比和农业生产规模等方面存在异质性。本研究首次系统评估农业生产托管对种植碳排放的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Agricultural Economic Review
China Agricultural Economic Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published in association with China Agricultural University and the Chinese Association for Agricultural Economics, China Agricultural Economic Review publishes academic writings by international scholars, and particularly encourages empirical work that can be replicated and extended by others; and research articles that employ econometric and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models. The journal aims to publish research which can be applied to China’s agricultural and rural policy-making process, the development of the agricultural economics discipline and to developing countries hoping to learn from China’s agricultural and rural development.
期刊最新文献
Impact of agricultural land ownership on child nutrition in rural Sudan: an investigation across gender Typologies of South African small-scale farmers and their risk perceptions: an unsupervised machine learning approach Trade and energy efficiency: theory and evidence How do digital media strengthen the role of social networks in promoting farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures? Saving farm subsidies with smart climate interventions: the case of transition to a millet-based agriculture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1