Development and Validation of a Composite Learning Index for Cambodian High School Students

Q1 Arts and Humanities ABAC Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.59865/abacj.2023.67
Bunhe Harth, Suwimon Wongwanich, Chayut Piromsombat
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Composite Learning Index for Cambodian High School Students","authors":"Bunhe Harth, Suwimon Wongwanich, Chayut Piromsombat","doi":"10.59865/abacj.2023.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to develop an instrument for measuring student learning and to establish a learning index for high school students. A sample of 1,619 Cambodian high school students was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected through a 56-item questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale and were analyzed using various statistical methods including descriptive statistics, content analysis, objectivity analysis, correlation analysis, construct validity (using M-plus), reliability analysis (using the R-package for Windows), and t-test analysis. The instrument consists of two key components: “Learning to Know” and “Learning to Do”, each further broken down into ‘Process’ and ‘Outcome’ elements. Each of these sub-components were represented by three distinct indicators. The instrument demonstrated good content validity with an Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) index ranging between 0.50 and 1.00, and excellent construct validity, supported by a variety of goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, SRMSR = 0.01, RMSEA = 0.02). The instrument also showed high internal consistency with reliability coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.93. The criterion-related validity was confirmed through known-groups validation. Two methods—criterion-related and norm-related—were used to determine students’ learning index levels. For this study, the norm-related method was chosen. The learning index was categorized into four levels: low (0.000 - 0.062), medium (0.063 - 0.375), relatively high (0.376 - 0.680), and high (0.681 - 1.000). Percentile ranks were also calculated to provide additional context for interpreting the learning indices of Cambodian high school students.","PeriodicalId":52152,"journal":{"name":"ABAC Journal","volume":" 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABAC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59865/abacj.2023.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an instrument for measuring student learning and to establish a learning index for high school students. A sample of 1,619 Cambodian high school students was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected through a 56-item questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale and were analyzed using various statistical methods including descriptive statistics, content analysis, objectivity analysis, correlation analysis, construct validity (using M-plus), reliability analysis (using the R-package for Windows), and t-test analysis. The instrument consists of two key components: “Learning to Know” and “Learning to Do”, each further broken down into ‘Process’ and ‘Outcome’ elements. Each of these sub-components were represented by three distinct indicators. The instrument demonstrated good content validity with an Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) index ranging between 0.50 and 1.00, and excellent construct validity, supported by a variety of goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, SRMSR = 0.01, RMSEA = 0.02). The instrument also showed high internal consistency with reliability coefficients ranging from 0.83 to 0.93. The criterion-related validity was confirmed through known-groups validation. Two methods—criterion-related and norm-related—were used to determine students’ learning index levels. For this study, the norm-related method was chosen. The learning index was categorized into four levels: low (0.000 - 0.062), medium (0.063 - 0.375), relatively high (0.376 - 0.680), and high (0.681 - 1.000). Percentile ranks were also calculated to provide additional context for interpreting the learning indices of Cambodian high school students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柬埔寨高中学生综合学习指数之开发与验证
本研究旨在开发一种测量学生学习的工具,并建立一套适用于高中生的学习指标。采用分层随机抽样方法,选取了1619名柬埔寨高中生作为样本。采用李克特5点量表进行56项问卷调查,并采用描述性统计、内容分析、客观性分析、相关性分析、结构效度分析(M-plus)、信度分析(R-package for Windows)、t检验分析等多种统计方法对数据进行分析。该工具由两个关键部分组成:“学会知道”和“学会做”,每个部分又进一步细分为“过程”和“结果”两个要素。每一个子组成部分都由三个不同的指标表示。该工具具有良好的内容效度,项目-目标一致性(IOC)指数在0.50 ~ 1.00之间;具有良好的结构效度,多种拟合优度指标支持(CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, SRMSR = 0.01, RMSEA = 0.02)。该仪器具有较高的内部一致性,信度系数在0.83 ~ 0.93之间。标准相关效度通过已知组验证得到证实。采用标准相关法和规范相关法测定学生的学习指标水平。本研究选择norm相关法。学习指数分为低(0.000 ~ 0.062)、中(0.063 ~ 0.375)、较高(0.376 ~ 0.680)、较高(0.681 ~ 1.000)四个等级。还计算了百分位排名,为解释柬埔寨高中生的学习指数提供了额外的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ABAC Journal
ABAC Journal Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Determinants of New Venture Survival: A Case Study of Startups in Thailand Exploring the Factors Influencing Chinese Consumers’ Condominium Purchase Decision Enforcement Branding Choice for SMEs Specialty Food Brands Among Indonesian Millennials The Determinants and Effects of Competitive Advantage of Lasem Batik Tulis MSEs Socialization and Impulse Buying of Young Adults in S-Commerce: Mediating Roles of Hedonic Browsing and Upward Social Comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1