Xue Li, Lirong Sun, Jianhua Zhang, Xin Li, Yi Yang, Lisha Zhu, Ying Zhang, Laili Wang
{"title":"Carbon Footprint of Wool at Cradle to Farm-Gate Stage in Victoria, Australia","authors":"Xue Li, Lirong Sun, Jianhua Zhang, Xin Li, Yi Yang, Lisha Zhu, Ying Zhang, Laili Wang","doi":"10.1177/24723444231201443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The raw material acquisition stage of wool involves raising sheep and a large amount of input and output, resulting in substantial greenhouse gas emissions. To date, the research literature on wool carbon footprint is limited, and there is a lack of research on Victoria. These studies did not consider the influence of changes in weight and productive lifespan. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by calculating the wool carbon footprint in Victoria and improving the calculation method. In this article, 20,000 sheep in Victoria were investigated. The average weights of the sheep were obtained by curve fitting and calculating. Two scenarios with 5-year and 6-year productive lifespans were used to calculate the carbon footprint of merino wool by the mass allocation method, economic allocation method, and protein mass allocation method. Results revealed that the carbon footprint of wool for the 5-year and 6-year productive lifespans were 14.158–49.040 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 -e)/kg wool and 16.743–52.882 kg CO 2 -e/kg wool. Rumination and excretion accounted for the largest proportion, followed by phosphate fertilizer, electricity, and potash fertilizer. The longer the productive lifespan and the heavier the sheep, the greater the greenhouse gas emissions from rumination and excretion, leading to a larger carbon footprint for wool. For the same productive lifespan, the economic allocation method produced the highest carbon footprint for wool compared to the mass allocation method, which produced the lowest carbon footprint. This study provides a reference for the subsequent carbon footprint accounting of wool from cradle to farm-gate and helps the wool industry save energy and reduce emissions.","PeriodicalId":6955,"journal":{"name":"AATCC Journal of Research","volume":" 46","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AATCC Journal of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24723444231201443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The raw material acquisition stage of wool involves raising sheep and a large amount of input and output, resulting in substantial greenhouse gas emissions. To date, the research literature on wool carbon footprint is limited, and there is a lack of research on Victoria. These studies did not consider the influence of changes in weight and productive lifespan. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by calculating the wool carbon footprint in Victoria and improving the calculation method. In this article, 20,000 sheep in Victoria were investigated. The average weights of the sheep were obtained by curve fitting and calculating. Two scenarios with 5-year and 6-year productive lifespans were used to calculate the carbon footprint of merino wool by the mass allocation method, economic allocation method, and protein mass allocation method. Results revealed that the carbon footprint of wool for the 5-year and 6-year productive lifespans were 14.158–49.040 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 -e)/kg wool and 16.743–52.882 kg CO 2 -e/kg wool. Rumination and excretion accounted for the largest proportion, followed by phosphate fertilizer, electricity, and potash fertilizer. The longer the productive lifespan and the heavier the sheep, the greater the greenhouse gas emissions from rumination and excretion, leading to a larger carbon footprint for wool. For the same productive lifespan, the economic allocation method produced the highest carbon footprint for wool compared to the mass allocation method, which produced the lowest carbon footprint. This study provides a reference for the subsequent carbon footprint accounting of wool from cradle to farm-gate and helps the wool industry save energy and reduce emissions.
羊毛的原料获取阶段涉及养羊和大量的投入产出,造成大量的温室气体排放。迄今为止,关于羊毛碳足迹的研究文献有限,对维多利亚的研究较少。这些研究没有考虑体重和生产寿命变化的影响。本研究旨在通过计算维多利亚州的羊毛碳足迹和改进计算方法来解决这一知识差距。本文对维多利亚州的2万只羊进行了调查。通过曲线拟合和计算得到绵羊的平均体重。采用5年和6年生产寿命两种情景,分别采用质量分配法、经济分配法和蛋白质质量分配法计算美利奴羊毛的碳足迹。结果表明,羊毛5年和6年生产寿命的碳足迹分别为14.158 ~ 49.040 kg co2当量/kg羊毛和16.743 ~ 52.882 kg co2当量/kg羊毛。反刍和排泄所占比例最大,其次是磷肥、电、钾肥。绵羊的生产寿命越长,体重越重,反刍和排泄产生的温室气体排放量就越大,导致羊毛的碳足迹更大。对于相同的生产寿命,与产生最低碳足迹的质量分配方法相比,经济分配方法产生的羊毛碳足迹最高。本研究为后续羊毛从摇篮到农场大门的碳足迹核算提供参考,有助于羊毛行业节能减排。
期刊介绍:
AATCC Journal of Research. This textile research journal has a broad scope: from advanced materials, fibers, and textile and polymer chemistry, to color science, apparel design, and sustainability.
Now indexed by Science Citation Index Extended (SCIE) and discoverable in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection! The Journal’s impact factor is available in Journal Citation Reports.