Stability analysis and support requirements for haulage drift in the vicinity of mined stopes

IF 4.5 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk Pub Date : 2023-10-08 DOI:10.1080/19475705.2023.2265146
Huaibin Li, Changxiang Wang, Xinzhu Hua, Xingdong Zhao, Bibo Dai, Zujun Huang
{"title":"Stability analysis and support requirements for haulage drift in the vicinity of mined stopes","authors":"Huaibin Li, Changxiang Wang, Xinzhu Hua, Xingdong Zhao, Bibo Dai, Zujun Huang","doi":"10.1080/19475705.2023.2265146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, combined empirical, numerical, and in-situ monitoring methods were combined to carry out stability analyses and support design for a haulage drift subjected to mining activity. The rock mass quality of the haulage drift was characterized by the RMR, Q, and GSI, and the rock mass properties were calculated. The support requirements for haulage drift during mining were determined by rock mass classification systems. RS2 was used to analyze the plastic zone and displacement of the haulage drift during mining. After the stope was mined, the surrounding rock exhibited a butterfly plastic zone with an asymmetric distribution, and the roof damage was most severe near the stope side. Overall, the haulage drift tended to move in the stope direction, which is consistent with engineering expectations. The support systems determined using the empirical method were analyzed using RS2 and UNWEDGE software. The maximum plastic zone depth of the roof decreased from 4.2 to 2.01 m, and the safety factor of the unstable wedge block increased from 0 to 10.2 after support. In-situ drilling detection shows that the failure depth of the haulage drift roof is 2.37 m. Therefore, a combination of empirical, numerical, and in-situ monitoring methods can be effective for quantitative stability assessments and support design optimization of haulage drifts in the vicinity of mined stopes.","PeriodicalId":51283,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2265146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, combined empirical, numerical, and in-situ monitoring methods were combined to carry out stability analyses and support design for a haulage drift subjected to mining activity. The rock mass quality of the haulage drift was characterized by the RMR, Q, and GSI, and the rock mass properties were calculated. The support requirements for haulage drift during mining were determined by rock mass classification systems. RS2 was used to analyze the plastic zone and displacement of the haulage drift during mining. After the stope was mined, the surrounding rock exhibited a butterfly plastic zone with an asymmetric distribution, and the roof damage was most severe near the stope side. Overall, the haulage drift tended to move in the stope direction, which is consistent with engineering expectations. The support systems determined using the empirical method were analyzed using RS2 and UNWEDGE software. The maximum plastic zone depth of the roof decreased from 4.2 to 2.01 m, and the safety factor of the unstable wedge block increased from 0 to 10.2 after support. In-situ drilling detection shows that the failure depth of the haulage drift roof is 2.37 m. Therefore, a combination of empirical, numerical, and in-situ monitoring methods can be effective for quantitative stability assessments and support design optimization of haulage drifts in the vicinity of mined stopes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定性分析和支持要求运输平巷附近的开采采场
本文采用经验、数值和现场监测相结合的方法,对某运输巷道采动后的稳定性进行了分析和支护设计。利用RMR、Q和GSI对运输巷道的岩体质量进行表征,并计算岩体性质。利用岩体分级系统确定了采矿过程中运输巷道的支护要求。利用RS2软件对采矿过程中运输巷道的塑性区和位移进行了分析。采场回采后,围岩呈现不对称分布的蝴蝶状塑性区,顶板在采场侧附近破坏最为严重。总体上看,牵引位移有向采场方向移动的趋势,与工程预期一致。采用RS2和UNWEDGE软件对经验法确定的支撑体系进行分析。顶板最大塑性区深度由4.2 m减小到2.01 m,不稳定楔块安全系数由0提高到10.2。现场钻孔检测结果表明,运输进巷顶板破坏深度为2.37 m。因此,将经验、数值和现场监测相结合,可以有效地进行采场附近运输巷道稳定性定量评价和支护设计优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk is to address new concepts, approaches and case studies using geospatial and remote sensing techniques to study monitoring, mapping, risk mitigation, risk vulnerability and early warning of natural hazards. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk covers the following topics: - Remote sensing techniques - Natural hazards associated with land, ocean, atmosphere, land-ocean-atmosphere coupling and climate change - Emerging problems related to multi-hazard risk assessment, multi-vulnerability risk assessment, risk quantification and the economic aspects of hazards. - Results of findings on major natural hazards
期刊最新文献
Drought driving mechanism and risk situation prediction based on machine learning models in the Yellow River Basin, China Dynamic association of slope movements in the Uttarakhand Himalaya: a critical review on the landslide susceptibility assessment Co-seismic characterization analysis in PWV and land-atmospheric observations associated with Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake occurrence in China on September 5, 2022 Application research on digital twins of urban earthquake disasters Numerical simulation and safety distance analysis of slope instability of ionic rare earth tailings in different rainy seasons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1