What it takes to be religious: Religion online vs. online religion1

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1386/jammr_00061_1
Filiz Çömez-Polat, Göklem Tekdemir
{"title":"What it takes to be religious: Religion online vs. online religion1","authors":"Filiz Çömez-Polat, Göklem Tekdemir","doi":"10.1386/jammr_00061_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How individuals live their religion has been one of the most frequently studied areas of social sciences in recent years. The starting point of this study is based on the observation that people who describe themselves as religious have different ways of using social media platforms in relation to their religious beliefs. Similar to the diversity observed in the definitions of religiosity over Christianity in the West, different interpretations of Islam and Islamic way of living have also become prevalent in Turkey. With the intensification of computer-mediated communication, the communication resources and forms of discourses (re)produced online of the religious people have also diversified. This study aims to examine how active users of social media in relation to their religious values and commitments evaluate the construction and byproducts of religion online. The results show that there are three main repertoires related to the use of social media and religiosity in Turkey: religiosity as religious duties, religiosity as interpreting Islam and religiosity for managing impressions. The results can be evaluated together with the secularization theory, that is, discourses about being religious ‘warn’ individuals about the negative consequences of social media use, while offering an alternative to the positive ones.","PeriodicalId":36098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00061_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How individuals live their religion has been one of the most frequently studied areas of social sciences in recent years. The starting point of this study is based on the observation that people who describe themselves as religious have different ways of using social media platforms in relation to their religious beliefs. Similar to the diversity observed in the definitions of religiosity over Christianity in the West, different interpretations of Islam and Islamic way of living have also become prevalent in Turkey. With the intensification of computer-mediated communication, the communication resources and forms of discourses (re)produced online of the religious people have also diversified. This study aims to examine how active users of social media in relation to their religious values and commitments evaluate the construction and byproducts of religion online. The results show that there are three main repertoires related to the use of social media and religiosity in Turkey: religiosity as religious duties, religiosity as interpreting Islam and religiosity for managing impressions. The results can be evaluated together with the secularization theory, that is, discourses about being religious ‘warn’ individuals about the negative consequences of social media use, while offering an alternative to the positive ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何成为虔诚的信徒:网上宗教vs.网上宗教
近年来,个人如何信仰宗教一直是社会科学研究最频繁的领域之一。这项研究的出发点是基于这样一种观察,即自称有宗教信仰的人使用社交媒体平台的方式与他们的宗教信仰有关。与西方对基督教的宗教信仰定义的多样性类似,对伊斯兰教和伊斯兰生活方式的不同解释也在土耳其流行起来。随着计算机媒介传播的加剧,宗教界人士在网络上产生的传播资源和话语(再)形式也出现了多样化。本研究旨在探讨活跃的社交媒体用户如何根据他们的宗教价值观和承诺来评估在线宗教的构建和副产品。结果表明,在土耳其,与社交媒体的使用和宗教信仰有关的主要表现有三种:作为宗教义务的宗教信仰,作为解释伊斯兰教的宗教信仰,以及作为管理印象的宗教信仰。结果可以与世俗化理论一起评估,即关于宗教的话语“警告”个人关于社交媒体使用的负面后果,同时提供积极后果的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Enhancing prosocial behaviour and donation intentions through neuroscientific techniques (EEG and eye tracker): Exploring the influence of charitable advertisement appeals Falsehood on social media in Egypt: Rumour detection and sentiment analysis of users’ comments Exploring Arab communication research: A systematic review from 2000 to 2021 Mediated mythical discourses: A critical analysis of the female docility and religious discourses in Indian TV soap operas Beauty hacks, wardrobe suggestions and DIY regimes for a Muslim bride: Analysis of bridal beauty vlogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1