Urban green governance and mechanisms of generation of ecosystem services: Milan’s green governance models

IF 2.4 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Sociology Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1080/23251042.2023.2277972
Oscar Luigi Azzimonti
{"title":"Urban green governance and mechanisms of generation of ecosystem services: Milan’s green governance models","authors":"Oscar Luigi Azzimonti","doi":"10.1080/23251042.2023.2277972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper studies the governance of the green spaces in the metropolitan area of Milan, aiming to understand the political mechanisms that underpin the generation of ecosystem services in the urban context. Based on semi-structured interviews to relevant policymakers and stakeholders and on the study of planning documents and greening policies, the research identifies the main actors who are involved in green planning and management in the city and in the metropolitan area. By analysing their green management and planning roles, economic resources and greening visions and priorities, the study depicts five coexisting green governance models. In particular, the research highlights the decreasing influence of public institutions in green planning and management and the rising relevance of private-public collaborations. These dynamics of green governance may affect the generation and the distribution of ecosystem services. On the one hand, greening in private-led regeneration processes tend toward recreational and final ecosystem services, aiming to raise land values. On the other hand, the civic projects of afforestation have evolved in territorial initiatives that go beyond the mere objective of implementing new green spaces, looking at broader planning themes – i.e. soft mobility and social welfare – demanding a stronger metropolitan coordination.KEYWORDS: Urban green spacesgovernanceecosystem servicespolitical ecologyurban regenerationMilan Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Informed consent statementInformed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.In accordance with the Italian and European legislation, the research was exempt from approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee. (https://www.unimib.it/ateneo/organizzazione/organi/comitato-etico)Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2023.2277972Notes1. See Pasqui (Citation2019) or Moini et al., (Citation2019) for detailed analyses on the governance of urban regeneration processes in Milan.2. See, for instance the last Metropolitan Plan on heat waves and nature-based solutions (Città Metropolitana di Milano Citation2020) and the project Life Metro Adapt (http://www.lifemetroadapt.eu/it/) [last retrieved: 30/01/2022]3. The final budget for ordinary and extraordinary maintenance in all the parks that are managed by the municipality is around € 1 per m2 (per year), which, as one of the municipal green sector supervisors claimed, it’s a rather low budget. « We keep a level of expenses which is rather low in relation to the quality of the green spaces, that we would like to have much improved. » [I1]4. See https://bam.milano.it/en/ [Last retrieved 30/04/2023]5. Parco Nord is officially a regional park, and therefore an institutional actor. However, considering the peculiar story of the afforestation and of the park, it could also be considered as the collective effort of associations and grassroots organisations.6. The information on Parco Nord and Boscoincittà are retrieved from the interviews. Further documentation may be find on the websites: https://parconord.milano.it/ and https://www.boscoincitta.it/ [last retrieved on 03/01/2023], or on Parco Nord Statute (https://parconord.milano.it/come-funziona-il-parco/lente-parco/lo-statuto/) [last retrieved on 03/01/2023], or on Boscoincittà publications https://www.boscoincitta.it/pubblicazioni/Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Notes on contributorsOscar Luigi AzzimontiOscar Luigi Azzimonti is an urban and environmental sociologist. He has worked on several issues concerning the connections between human societies and the environment, such as environmental risk and social vulnerability, urban green space and ecosystem services, urban environmental governance, sustainable mobility, and walkability. He is currently working as postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Sociology of the University of Milan-Bicocca (Italy).","PeriodicalId":54173,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sociology","volume":" 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2023.2277972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper studies the governance of the green spaces in the metropolitan area of Milan, aiming to understand the political mechanisms that underpin the generation of ecosystem services in the urban context. Based on semi-structured interviews to relevant policymakers and stakeholders and on the study of planning documents and greening policies, the research identifies the main actors who are involved in green planning and management in the city and in the metropolitan area. By analysing their green management and planning roles, economic resources and greening visions and priorities, the study depicts five coexisting green governance models. In particular, the research highlights the decreasing influence of public institutions in green planning and management and the rising relevance of private-public collaborations. These dynamics of green governance may affect the generation and the distribution of ecosystem services. On the one hand, greening in private-led regeneration processes tend toward recreational and final ecosystem services, aiming to raise land values. On the other hand, the civic projects of afforestation have evolved in territorial initiatives that go beyond the mere objective of implementing new green spaces, looking at broader planning themes – i.e. soft mobility and social welfare – demanding a stronger metropolitan coordination.KEYWORDS: Urban green spacesgovernanceecosystem servicespolitical ecologyurban regenerationMilan Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Informed consent statementInformed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.In accordance with the Italian and European legislation, the research was exempt from approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee. (https://www.unimib.it/ateneo/organizzazione/organi/comitato-etico)Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2023.2277972Notes1. See Pasqui (Citation2019) or Moini et al., (Citation2019) for detailed analyses on the governance of urban regeneration processes in Milan.2. See, for instance the last Metropolitan Plan on heat waves and nature-based solutions (Città Metropolitana di Milano Citation2020) and the project Life Metro Adapt (http://www.lifemetroadapt.eu/it/) [last retrieved: 30/01/2022]3. The final budget for ordinary and extraordinary maintenance in all the parks that are managed by the municipality is around € 1 per m2 (per year), which, as one of the municipal green sector supervisors claimed, it’s a rather low budget. « We keep a level of expenses which is rather low in relation to the quality of the green spaces, that we would like to have much improved. » [I1]4. See https://bam.milano.it/en/ [Last retrieved 30/04/2023]5. Parco Nord is officially a regional park, and therefore an institutional actor. However, considering the peculiar story of the afforestation and of the park, it could also be considered as the collective effort of associations and grassroots organisations.6. The information on Parco Nord and Boscoincittà are retrieved from the interviews. Further documentation may be find on the websites: https://parconord.milano.it/ and https://www.boscoincitta.it/ [last retrieved on 03/01/2023], or on Parco Nord Statute (https://parconord.milano.it/come-funziona-il-parco/lente-parco/lo-statuto/) [last retrieved on 03/01/2023], or on Boscoincittà publications https://www.boscoincitta.it/pubblicazioni/Additional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Notes on contributorsOscar Luigi AzzimontiOscar Luigi Azzimonti is an urban and environmental sociologist. He has worked on several issues concerning the connections between human societies and the environment, such as environmental risk and social vulnerability, urban green space and ecosystem services, urban environmental governance, sustainable mobility, and walkability. He is currently working as postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Sociology of the University of Milan-Bicocca (Italy).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市绿色治理与生态系统服务生成机制:米兰的绿色治理模式
摘要本文研究了米兰都市圈绿地的治理,旨在了解城市环境中支撑生态系统服务产生的政治机制。基于对相关政策制定者和利益相关者的半结构化访谈以及对规划文件和绿化政策的研究,本研究确定了参与城市和大都市区绿色规划和管理的主要行为者。本研究通过分析这些机构的绿色管理和规划角色、经济资源、绿化愿景和优先事项,描绘了五种共存的绿色治理模式。该研究特别强调了公共机构在绿色规划和管理方面的影响力正在下降,而公私合作的相关性正在上升。这些绿色治理的动态可能影响生态系统服务的产生和分配。一方面,在私人主导的再生过程中,绿化倾向于娱乐和最终的生态系统服务,旨在提高土地价值。另一方面,公民造林项目已经演变为领土倡议,超越了实施新的绿色空间的单纯目标,着眼于更广泛的规划主题-即软流动性和社会福利-要求更强的都市协调。关键词:城市绿色空间治理生态系统服务政治生态城市再生米兰披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。知情同意声明所有参与研究的受试者均获得了知情同意。根据意大利和欧洲的法律,这项研究不需要机构伦理委员会的批准。(https://www.unimib.it/ateneo/organizzazione/organi/comitato-etico)Supplementary材料本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2023.2277972Notes1上在线获取。参见Pasqui (Citation2019)或Moini等人(Citation2019)对米兰城市更新过程治理的详细分析。例如,参见关于热浪和基于自然的解决方案的最新都市规划(citt Metropolitana di Milano Citation2020)和Life Metro Adapt项目(http://www.lifemetroadapt.eu/it/)[最后更新:30/01/2022]。市政府管理的所有公园的普通和特别维护的最终预算约为每平方米(每年)1欧元,正如一位市政绿色部门主管所说,这是一个相当低的预算。“与绿地的质量相比,我们保持了相当低的费用水平,我们希望能得到很大的改善。”»(I1) 4。参见https://bam.milano.it/en/[最后检索日期30/04/2023]Parco Nord是一个正式的区域公园,因此是一个机构行动者。然而,考虑到植树造林和公园的特殊故事,它也可以被认为是协会和基层组织的集体努力。关于Parco Nord和boscoincittcn的信息是从采访中获取的。进一步的文件可在以下网站找到:https://parconord.milano.it/和https://www.boscoincitta.it/[最后检索日期:2023年1月3日],或Parco Nord Statute (https://parconord.milano.it/come-funziona-il-parco/lente-parco/lo-statuto/)[最后检索日期:2023年1月3日],或boscoincitt publications https://www.boscoincitta.it/pubblicazioni/Additional informationfunding本研究没有从公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构获得任何特定的资助。oscar Luigi Azzimonti是一位城市和环境社会学家。他的研究领域包括环境风险与社会脆弱性、城市绿地与生态系统服务、城市环境治理、可持续交通与步行性等。现为意大利米兰-比可卡大学社会学系博士后研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sociology
Environmental Sociology ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Environmental Sociology is dedicated to applying and advancing the sociological imagination in relation to a wide variety of environmental challenges, controversies and issues, at every level from the global to local, from ‘world culture’ to diverse local perspectives. As an international, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, Environmental Sociology aims to stretch the conceptual and theoretical boundaries of both environmental and mainstream sociology, to highlight the relevance of sociological research for environmental policy and management, to disseminate the results of sociological research, and to engage in productive dialogue and debate with other disciplines in the social, natural and ecological sciences. Contributions may utilize a variety of theoretical orientations including, but not restricted to: critical theory, cultural sociology, ecofeminism, ecological modernization, environmental justice, organizational sociology, political ecology, political economy, post-colonial studies, risk theory, social psychology, science and technology studies, globalization, world-systems analysis, and so on. Cross- and transdisciplinary contributions are welcome where they demonstrate a novel attempt to understand social-ecological relationships in a manner that engages with the core concerns of sociology in social relationships, institutions, practices and processes. All methodological approaches in the environmental social sciences – qualitative, quantitative, integrative, spatial, policy analysis, etc. – are welcomed. Environmental Sociology welcomes high-quality submissions from scholars around the world.
期刊最新文献
Human-animal connections: expanding and cross-worlding relational approaches to resilience Air quality sensors and distributional environmental justice: a case study of Salt Lake County, Utah Social mycorrhiza: The social infrastructure of agroecological farming economies Urban green governance and mechanisms of generation of ecosystem services: Milan’s green governance models Unyielding humanity from catastrophic ruins: new political society for social and environmental justice after Bhopal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1