Social Impact Assessment in Sport: Russian Context

I. V. Solntsev, R. M. Olkhovsky, E. A. Eremina
{"title":"Social Impact Assessment in Sport: Russian Context","authors":"I. V. Solntsev, R. M. Olkhovsky, E. A. Eremina","doi":"10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-2-70-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the current practice in the assessment of Russian social projects in the field of physical culture and sports. By such projects, the authors mean initiatives aimed at solving social problems (for example, in the field of health care, education or crime reduction) through sports. Approaches to the evaluation of social projects in general, and its features for sports, in particular, are still poorly represented in the academic literature. At the same time, the reduction in funding and the relevance of choosing a limited number of initiatives from plenty will make this topic even more in demand. As a research methodology, the authors used an analysis of existing grant competitions and review of methods used by charitable organizations. In particular, the provisions of 11 competitions aimed at supporting social initiatives in the field of sports, as well as annual reports of several charitable foundations, were considered. As a result, it was found that expert models and change theory are among the most popular. Besides authors present a comparative analysis of the assessment criteria used. Foreign assessment practice is more focused on monetary models, including SROI and cost-benefit, which are not yet sufficiently common in Russia. The conducted research can be of value for organizations that implement and support social projects in the field of sports, as well as for the public sector, primarily from the standpoint of developing their own assessment methodology and substantiating the criteria used.","PeriodicalId":31948,"journal":{"name":"Mir Ekonomiki i Upravlenia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mir Ekonomiki i Upravlenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2023-23-2-70-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the current practice in the assessment of Russian social projects in the field of physical culture and sports. By such projects, the authors mean initiatives aimed at solving social problems (for example, in the field of health care, education or crime reduction) through sports. Approaches to the evaluation of social projects in general, and its features for sports, in particular, are still poorly represented in the academic literature. At the same time, the reduction in funding and the relevance of choosing a limited number of initiatives from plenty will make this topic even more in demand. As a research methodology, the authors used an analysis of existing grant competitions and review of methods used by charitable organizations. In particular, the provisions of 11 competitions aimed at supporting social initiatives in the field of sports, as well as annual reports of several charitable foundations, were considered. As a result, it was found that expert models and change theory are among the most popular. Besides authors present a comparative analysis of the assessment criteria used. Foreign assessment practice is more focused on monetary models, including SROI and cost-benefit, which are not yet sufficiently common in Russia. The conducted research can be of value for organizations that implement and support social projects in the field of sports, as well as for the public sector, primarily from the standpoint of developing their own assessment methodology and substantiating the criteria used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育社会影响评估:俄罗斯背景
本文对俄罗斯体育社会项目评估的现状进行了分析。提交人所说的此类项目是指旨在通过体育解决社会问题(例如,在保健、教育或减少犯罪领域)的倡议。一般社会项目的评价方法,特别是其对体育的特点,在学术文献中仍然缺乏代表性。与此同时,资金的减少和从大量项目中选择有限项目的相关性将使这一主题更加受欢迎。作为研究方法,作者对现有的资助竞争进行了分析,并对慈善组织使用的方法进行了回顾。会议特别审议了旨在支持体育领域的社会倡议的11项竞赛的规定,以及若干慈善基金会的年度报告。结果发现,专家模型和变革理论是最受欢迎的。此外,作者还对所采用的评估标准进行了比较分析。国外的评估实践更侧重于货币模型,包括SROI和成本效益,这在俄罗斯还不够普遍。所进行的研究可以对在体育领域实施和支持社会项目的组织以及公共部门有价值,主要是从制定自己的评估方法和证实所使用的标准的角度来看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Impact Assessment in Sport: Russian Context Experience of Centralization and Transformation of Procurement Activities in a Large Company The Cozzolino Criterion as a Tool of Oil and Gas Exploration Projects Evaluation Adjusted for Risk Aversion Anchor high-tech and knowledge-intensive companies as the basis of technological sovereignty Risks of the Smart City Concept
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1