Comparing the Incidence of Dental Defects in Oval Root Canals Prepared with Two Distinct Endodontic Rotary Files: An In Vitro Study

Harsha Pujari, Preetpal Sandhu
{"title":"Comparing the Incidence of Dental Defects in Oval Root Canals Prepared with Two Distinct Endodontic Rotary Files: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Harsha Pujari, Preetpal Sandhu","doi":"10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this work is to compare the incidence of dentinal defects in oval root canals with two different file systems and examine and contrast the creation of dentinal cracks using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a stereomicroscope during the root canal preparation process. Material and Method: Three groups of 15 were created from the sixty extracted human mandibular premolars: two were experimental and one was control. The experimental groups underwent root canal therapy. Group I the control group, did not receive any preparations. Group II is the Waldent walflex file and group III is the Trunatomy (TRN) file. After sectioning the roots at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, the surfaces were examined with a stereomicroscope and SEM. Results: The data were examined using the Chi-square test. There were no fissures in the untreated group. The area between 3mm and 6mm was where the cracks in Waldent Walflex were most evident. There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups at either the 6 mm or 9 mm levels (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, each rotary file utilized in the testing caused dentinal cracks. Compared to the Trunatomy file group, the Waldent walflex file group has more errors. The apical area of the samples had much more defects than the median and coronal regions.","PeriodicalId":93501,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Dentistry","volume":" 24","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoade.2023.04.0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this work is to compare the incidence of dentinal defects in oval root canals with two different file systems and examine and contrast the creation of dentinal cracks using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a stereomicroscope during the root canal preparation process. Material and Method: Three groups of 15 were created from the sixty extracted human mandibular premolars: two were experimental and one was control. The experimental groups underwent root canal therapy. Group I the control group, did not receive any preparations. Group II is the Waldent walflex file and group III is the Trunatomy (TRN) file. After sectioning the roots at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, the surfaces were examined with a stereomicroscope and SEM. Results: The data were examined using the Chi-square test. There were no fissures in the untreated group. The area between 3mm and 6mm was where the cracks in Waldent Walflex were most evident. There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups at either the 6 mm or 9 mm levels (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, each rotary file utilized in the testing caused dentinal cracks. Compared to the Trunatomy file group, the Waldent walflex file group has more errors. The apical area of the samples had much more defects than the median and coronal regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同根管旋转锉制备的椭圆根管缺损发生率的比较:一项体外研究
目的:比较两种不同锉制下椭圆根管内牙本质缺损的发生率,并利用扫描电镜和体视显微镜观察和对比根管预备过程中牙本质裂纹的形成情况。材料与方法:以60颗人下颌前磨牙为材料,制作3组,每组15颗,2组为实验组,1组为对照组。实验组接受根管治疗。第一组为对照组,不接受任何制剂。第二组是Waldent walflex文件,第三组是Trunatomy (TRN)文件。在离根尖3、6和9 mm处切片后,用体视显微镜和扫描电镜观察根的表面。结果:数据采用卡方检验。未治疗组无骨裂。Waldent Walflex的裂缝在3mm到6mm之间的区域最为明显。在6 mm和9 mm水平上,实验组之间无统计学差异(P >0.05)。结论:试验中使用的每一种旋转锉均造成牙本质裂纹。与Trunatomy文件组相比,Waldent walflex文件组有更多的错误。样品的根尖区比中位区和冠状区有更多的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lip Repositioning to Improve the Harmony of the Smile: A Surgical Case Report Schwannoma (Neurilemmoma). Ectopic Position in Maxillary Sinus Pathogenesis and Oral-Related Factors in Post-COVID-19 Mucormycosis Patients: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Case Reports Dental and Implantoprosthetic Rehabilitation of the Vertical Dimension in an Elderly Patient with Severe Parafunction Comparative Analysis of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of NeoEndo Flex Vs Protaper Gold Rotary Files: An In-Vitro Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1