Luiz Augusto da Silva Florêncio, Mauricio Ehrlich, Seyed Hamed Mirmoradi
{"title":"Secondary reinforcement effect on the value and location of maximum reinforcement load","authors":"Luiz Augusto da Silva Florêncio, Mauricio Ehrlich, Seyed Hamed Mirmoradi","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.23.00048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper numerically evaluates the effect of secondary reinforcement on the value and location of the maximum reinforcement load along the primary reinforcement layers (T max ) in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls under working stress conditions. Data from three instrumented sections of a well-instrumented GRS wall were used for model validation. A parametric study was carried out considering different controlling factors (i.e. the vertical reinforcement spacing, facing type and secondary reinforcement stiffness and length). The results show that for a constant relative soil-reinforcement stiffness index, the variation of the vertical reinforcement spacing and stiffness may not affect the location and normalised value of T max . In general, for the conventionally used type of reinforcement, the secondary reinforcement inclusion reduces T max to values lower than those corresponding to the active condition (K a ). For a given facing type, the combined effect of the secondary reinforcement length and stiffness is the main factor that controls the T max location. In general, increasing the secondary reinforcement stiffness and length moves the location of T max from the back of the facing to a distance corresponding to the length of the secondary reinforcement layers. In addition, for this condition, a flexible face model performs similarly to a block face model.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.23.00048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper numerically evaluates the effect of secondary reinforcement on the value and location of the maximum reinforcement load along the primary reinforcement layers (T max ) in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls under working stress conditions. Data from three instrumented sections of a well-instrumented GRS wall were used for model validation. A parametric study was carried out considering different controlling factors (i.e. the vertical reinforcement spacing, facing type and secondary reinforcement stiffness and length). The results show that for a constant relative soil-reinforcement stiffness index, the variation of the vertical reinforcement spacing and stiffness may not affect the location and normalised value of T max . In general, for the conventionally used type of reinforcement, the secondary reinforcement inclusion reduces T max to values lower than those corresponding to the active condition (K a ). For a given facing type, the combined effect of the secondary reinforcement length and stiffness is the main factor that controls the T max location. In general, increasing the secondary reinforcement stiffness and length moves the location of T max from the back of the facing to a distance corresponding to the length of the secondary reinforcement layers. In addition, for this condition, a flexible face model performs similarly to a block face model.