Secondary reinforcement effect on the value and location of maximum reinforcement load

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1680/jgeen.23.00048
Luiz Augusto da Silva Florêncio, Mauricio Ehrlich, Seyed Hamed Mirmoradi
{"title":"Secondary reinforcement effect on the value and location of maximum reinforcement load","authors":"Luiz Augusto da Silva Florêncio, Mauricio Ehrlich, Seyed Hamed Mirmoradi","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.23.00048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper numerically evaluates the effect of secondary reinforcement on the value and location of the maximum reinforcement load along the primary reinforcement layers (T max ) in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls under working stress conditions. Data from three instrumented sections of a well-instrumented GRS wall were used for model validation. A parametric study was carried out considering different controlling factors (i.e. the vertical reinforcement spacing, facing type and secondary reinforcement stiffness and length). The results show that for a constant relative soil-reinforcement stiffness index, the variation of the vertical reinforcement spacing and stiffness may not affect the location and normalised value of T max . In general, for the conventionally used type of reinforcement, the secondary reinforcement inclusion reduces T max to values lower than those corresponding to the active condition (K a ). For a given facing type, the combined effect of the secondary reinforcement length and stiffness is the main factor that controls the T max location. In general, increasing the secondary reinforcement stiffness and length moves the location of T max from the back of the facing to a distance corresponding to the length of the secondary reinforcement layers. In addition, for this condition, a flexible face model performs similarly to a block face model.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.23.00048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper numerically evaluates the effect of secondary reinforcement on the value and location of the maximum reinforcement load along the primary reinforcement layers (T max ) in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls under working stress conditions. Data from three instrumented sections of a well-instrumented GRS wall were used for model validation. A parametric study was carried out considering different controlling factors (i.e. the vertical reinforcement spacing, facing type and secondary reinforcement stiffness and length). The results show that for a constant relative soil-reinforcement stiffness index, the variation of the vertical reinforcement spacing and stiffness may not affect the location and normalised value of T max . In general, for the conventionally used type of reinforcement, the secondary reinforcement inclusion reduces T max to values lower than those corresponding to the active condition (K a ). For a given facing type, the combined effect of the secondary reinforcement length and stiffness is the main factor that controls the T max location. In general, increasing the secondary reinforcement stiffness and length moves the location of T max from the back of the facing to a distance corresponding to the length of the secondary reinforcement layers. In addition, for this condition, a flexible face model performs similarly to a block face model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二次配筋对最大配筋荷载的取值和位置有影响
本文数值计算了在工作应力条件下,二次加筋对土工合成土(GRS)墙体沿主筋层最大加筋荷载(tmax)的取值和位置的影响。来自三个仪器测量的GRS壁的数据用于模型验证。考虑不同控制因素(竖向配筋间距、面板类型、二次配筋刚度和长度),进行了参数化研究。结果表明:当土-筋相对刚度指标一定时,竖向筋间距和刚度的变化不会影响T max的位置和归一化值;一般来说,对于常规使用的钢筋类型,二次钢筋夹杂物将tmax降低到低于活性条件(K a)对应的值。对于给定面板类型,二次配筋长度和刚度的综合作用是控制最大配筋位置的主要因素。一般来说,增加二次配筋刚度和长度会使T max的位置从面板背面移动到与二次配筋层长度相对应的距离。此外,对于这种情况,柔性面模型的执行类似于块面模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1