Hyperbolic load-displacement analysis of helical and expanded piles: database approach

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1680/jgeen.23.00196
A. Rahimi, A. Eslami, J. S. McCartney
{"title":"Hyperbolic load-displacement analysis of helical and expanded piles: database approach","authors":"A. Rahimi, A. Eslami, J. S. McCartney","doi":"10.1680/jgeen.23.00196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been a focus on improving geotechnical systems by implementing and constructing new deep foundation such as helical and expanded piles. This study examined the effects of parameters such as embedment depth, pile geometry, and axial loading direction on the load-displacement behaviour of these piles. To conduct the research, a database was compiled consisting of 80 axial loading test records for different piles. The embedment depth of the piles ranged from 2.4 to 36.8 m, and the diameter of helices or expanded parts ranged from 254 to 1500 mm. The ultimate load of the piles was determined using the 2.5% and 5% displacement ratio criteria and the Brinch-Hansen 80% method. Additionally, hyperbolic functions were fitted to the load-displacement curves, allowing for consistent estimation of the limit load and the initial tangent modulus. Analysis of the results from the database revealed that the dominant factors influencing the ultimate load, limit load, maximum measured load, initial stiffness, and load-displacement behaviour were the ratio of helices or expanded part diameter to shaft diameter, shaft and toe surface area, and load direction. Correlations derived from the database were validated using measurements from eight full-scale helical and expanded piles.","PeriodicalId":54572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.23.00196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a focus on improving geotechnical systems by implementing and constructing new deep foundation such as helical and expanded piles. This study examined the effects of parameters such as embedment depth, pile geometry, and axial loading direction on the load-displacement behaviour of these piles. To conduct the research, a database was compiled consisting of 80 axial loading test records for different piles. The embedment depth of the piles ranged from 2.4 to 36.8 m, and the diameter of helices or expanded parts ranged from 254 to 1500 mm. The ultimate load of the piles was determined using the 2.5% and 5% displacement ratio criteria and the Brinch-Hansen 80% method. Additionally, hyperbolic functions were fitted to the load-displacement curves, allowing for consistent estimation of the limit load and the initial tangent modulus. Analysis of the results from the database revealed that the dominant factors influencing the ultimate load, limit load, maximum measured load, initial stiffness, and load-displacement behaviour were the ratio of helices or expanded part diameter to shaft diameter, shaft and toe surface area, and load direction. Correlations derived from the database were validated using measurements from eight full-scale helical and expanded piles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺旋桩和膨胀桩的双曲荷载-位移分析:数据库方法
近年来,通过实施和建造新的深基础(如螺旋桩和膨胀桩)来改善岩土系统一直是人们关注的焦点。本研究探讨了嵌入深度、桩的几何形状和轴向加载方向等参数对这些桩的荷载-位移行为的影响。为了开展这项研究,我们建立了一个数据库,其中包含 80 个不同桩的轴向加载测试记录。这些桩的嵌入深度从 2.4 米到 36.8 米不等,螺旋或膨胀部分的直径从 254 毫米到 1500 毫米不等。桩的极限荷载是根据 2.5% 和 5% 位移比标准以及布林奇-汉森 80% 法确定的。此外,还对荷载-位移曲线进行了双曲函数拟合,从而对极限荷载和初始切线模量进行了一致的估算。对数据库结果的分析表明,影响极限载荷、极限载荷、最大测量载荷、初始刚度和载荷-位移行为的主要因素是螺旋或膨胀部件直径与轴直径之比、轴和趾表面积以及载荷方向。通过对八个全尺寸螺旋桩和膨胀桩进行测量,对数据库中得出的相关性进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
68
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geotechnical Engineering provides a forum for the publication of high quality, topical and relevant technical papers covering all aspects of geotechnical research, design, construction and performance. The journal aims to be of interest to those civil, structural or geotechnical engineering practitioners wishing to develop a greater understanding of the influence of geotechnics on the built environment.
期刊最新文献
A case history of monitoring a wide pile group Part I: geology, single pile analysis and testing, and monitoring data Torsional vibration of a tapered pile considering circumferential support of surrounding soil Applicability of construction dewatering techniques for randomly fractured rock Sensitivity investigation of drilling efficiency to operational parameters of a drifter Hyperbolic load-displacement analysis of helical and expanded piles: database approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1