Towards data-driven decision making: the role of analytical culture and centralization efforts

IF 7.8 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Review of Managerial Science Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s11846-023-00694-1
Ágnes Szukits, Péter Móricz
{"title":"Towards data-driven decision making: the role of analytical culture and centralization efforts","authors":"Ágnes Szukits, Péter Móricz","doi":"10.1007/s11846-023-00694-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The surge in data-related investments has drawn the attention of both managers and academia to the question of whether and how this (re)shapes decision making routines. Drawing on the information processing theory of the organization and the agency theory, this paper addresses how putting a strategic emphasis on business analytics supports an analytical decision making culture that makes enhanced use of data in each phase of the decision making process, along with a potential change in authorities resulting from shifts in information asymmetry. Based on a survey of 305 medium-sized and large companies, we propose a multiple-mediator model. We provide support for our hypothesis that top management support for business analytics and perceived data quality are good predictors of an analytical culture. Furthermore, we argue that the analytical culture increases the centralization of data use, but interestingly, we found that this centralization is not associated with data-driven decision making. Our paper positions a long-running debate about information technology-related centralization of authorities in the new context of business analytics.","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00694-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The surge in data-related investments has drawn the attention of both managers and academia to the question of whether and how this (re)shapes decision making routines. Drawing on the information processing theory of the organization and the agency theory, this paper addresses how putting a strategic emphasis on business analytics supports an analytical decision making culture that makes enhanced use of data in each phase of the decision making process, along with a potential change in authorities resulting from shifts in information asymmetry. Based on a survey of 305 medium-sized and large companies, we propose a multiple-mediator model. We provide support for our hypothesis that top management support for business analytics and perceived data quality are good predictors of an analytical culture. Furthermore, we argue that the analytical culture increases the centralization of data use, but interestingly, we found that this centralization is not associated with data-driven decision making. Our paper positions a long-running debate about information technology-related centralization of authorities in the new context of business analytics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向数据驱动的决策:分析文化和集中工作的作用
数据相关投资的激增引起了管理者和学术界的关注,这是否以及如何(重新)影响决策程序。利用组织的信息处理理论和代理理论,本文阐述了将战略重点放在业务分析上如何支持分析性决策文化,从而在决策过程的每个阶段增强数据的使用,以及信息不对称变化导致的权威的潜在变化。基于对305家大中型企业的调查,本文提出了一个多中介模型。我们为我们的假设提供了支持,即高层管理人员对业务分析的支持和感知数据质量是分析文化的良好预测因素。此外,我们认为分析文化增加了数据使用的集中化,但有趣的是,我们发现这种集中化与数据驱动的决策没有关联。我们的论文提出了在商业分析的新背景下,关于信息技术相关的权力集中化的长期争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Does CSR facilitate access to trade credit? The role of family ownership Game on: curbing impulse buying and returns in apparel e-tailers Breaking or making futures: How laws and regulations shape innovation in emerging innovation systems From green HRM to SDG success: pathways through exploratory innovation and developmental culture Pathways to survive in abrupt adversities: a configurational approach to understanding the resilience of new venture teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1