How do Campaigns Shape Vote Choice? Multicountry Evidence from 62 Elections and 56 TV Debates

IF 11.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1093/qje/qjad002
Caroline Le Pennec, Vincent Pons
{"title":"How do Campaigns Shape Vote Choice? Multicountry Evidence from 62 Elections and 56 TV Debates","authors":"Caroline Le Pennec, Vincent Pons","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjad002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We use two-round survey data from 62 elections in 10 countries since 1952 to study the formation of vote choice, beliefs, and policy preferences and assess how televised debates contribute to this process. Our data include 253,000 observations. We compare the consistency between vote intention and vote choice of respondents surveyed at different points before, and then again after, the election, and show that 17% to 29% of voters make up their mind during the final two months of campaigns. Changes in vote choice are concomitant to shifts in issues voters find most important and in beliefs about candidates, and they generate sizable swings in vote shares. In contrast, policy preferences remain remarkably stable throughout the campaign. Finally, we use an event study to estimate the impact of TV debates, in which candidates themselves communicate with voters, and of shocks such as natural and technological disasters which, by contrast, occur independently from the campaign. We do not find any effect of either type of event on vote choice formation, suggesting that information received throughout the campaign from other sources such as the media, political activists, and other citizens is more impactful.","PeriodicalId":48470,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjad002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract We use two-round survey data from 62 elections in 10 countries since 1952 to study the formation of vote choice, beliefs, and policy preferences and assess how televised debates contribute to this process. Our data include 253,000 observations. We compare the consistency between vote intention and vote choice of respondents surveyed at different points before, and then again after, the election, and show that 17% to 29% of voters make up their mind during the final two months of campaigns. Changes in vote choice are concomitant to shifts in issues voters find most important and in beliefs about candidates, and they generate sizable swings in vote shares. In contrast, policy preferences remain remarkably stable throughout the campaign. Finally, we use an event study to estimate the impact of TV debates, in which candidates themselves communicate with voters, and of shocks such as natural and technological disasters which, by contrast, occur independently from the campaign. We do not find any effect of either type of event on vote choice formation, suggesting that information received throughout the campaign from other sources such as the media, political activists, and other citizens is more impactful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞选活动如何影响投票选择?62次选举和56次电视辩论的多国证据
本文利用1952年以来10个国家62次选举的两轮调查数据,研究了投票选择、信仰和政策偏好的形成,并评估了电视辩论如何促进这一过程。我们的数据包括253,000个观测值。我们比较了在选举前后不同时间点接受调查的受访者的投票意向和投票选择之间的一致性,结果表明,17%至29%的选民在竞选的最后两个月做出了决定。投票选择的变化伴随着选民认为最重要的问题和对候选人的看法的变化,它们会导致选票份额的大幅波动。相比之下,在整个竞选过程中,政策偏好保持了相当稳定。最后,我们使用事件研究来估计电视辩论的影响,在电视辩论中,候选人自己与选民沟通,以及自然和技术灾害等冲击,相比之下,独立于竞选活动发生。我们没有发现这两种类型的事件对投票选择形成有任何影响,这表明在整个竞选过程中,从其他来源(如媒体、政治活动家和其他公民)获得的信息更有影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of Economics stands as the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Published under the editorial guidance of Harvard University's Department of Economics, it comprehensively covers all aspects of the field. Esteemed by professional and academic economists as well as students worldwide, QJE holds unparalleled value in the economic discourse.
期刊最新文献
Predicting and Preventing Gun Violence: An Experimental Evaluation of READI Chicago. The Impact of Public School Choice: Evidence from Los Angeles’ Zones of Choice THe Economic Impacts of COVID-19: Evidence from a New Public Database Built Using Private Sector Data A Retrieved-Context Theory of Financial Decisions Organizational Structure and Pricing: Evidence from a Large U.S. Airline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1