Emotion, stimulation, habit, and criticality: Learning from teachers’ multifaceted conceptions of digital reading

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Research on Technology in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1080/15391523.2023.2264979
Brady L. Nash
{"title":"Emotion, stimulation, habit, and criticality: Learning from teachers’ multifaceted conceptions of digital reading","authors":"Brady L. Nash","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe emergence of post-truth culture and the spread of dis/misinformation has received a great deal of attention from researchers. Existing approaches to digital information literacy highlight new skills and strategies needed in digital spaces. However, challenges remain, including disconnects between school curricula and out-of-school experiences, a lack of research on teachers’ conceptions, and the role of emotional and sociocultural factors in meaning-making. Addressing these concerns, this qualitative case study examines how five teachers conceptualized and operationalized digital literacy through curriculum. The findings emphasize the importance of critical, sociocultural, emotional, and affective factors in conceptualizing and teaching digital literacy.Keywords: Digital literacyonline readingaffectcritical literacystimulationcurriculum developmentmeaning-makingliteracy studies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBrady L. NashBrady L. Nash is an Assistant Professor of English Language Arts in the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of English. His research focuses on critical approaches to digital literacies and new technologies in the context of humanities education and the ways in which people come to understand the world through engagements with digital media.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264979","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe emergence of post-truth culture and the spread of dis/misinformation has received a great deal of attention from researchers. Existing approaches to digital information literacy highlight new skills and strategies needed in digital spaces. However, challenges remain, including disconnects between school curricula and out-of-school experiences, a lack of research on teachers’ conceptions, and the role of emotional and sociocultural factors in meaning-making. Addressing these concerns, this qualitative case study examines how five teachers conceptualized and operationalized digital literacy through curriculum. The findings emphasize the importance of critical, sociocultural, emotional, and affective factors in conceptualizing and teaching digital literacy.Keywords: Digital literacyonline readingaffectcritical literacystimulationcurriculum developmentmeaning-makingliteracy studies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBrady L. NashBrady L. Nash is an Assistant Professor of English Language Arts in the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of English. His research focuses on critical approaches to digital literacies and new technologies in the context of humanities education and the ways in which people come to understand the world through engagements with digital media.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情感、刺激、习惯与批判性:从教师数字化阅读的多层面概念中学习
摘要后真相文化的出现和虚假信息的传播受到了研究者的广泛关注。现有的数字信息素养方法强调了数字空间所需的新技能和战略。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括学校课程与校外经验之间的脱节,缺乏对教师概念的研究,以及情感和社会文化因素在意义形成中的作用。为了解决这些问题,本定性案例研究考察了五位教师如何通过课程概念化和操作化数字素养。研究结果强调了关键、社会文化、情感和情感因素在概念化和数字素养教学中的重要性。关键词:数字读写能力;在线阅读影响;批判性读写能力;布雷迪·纳什布雷迪·纳什是教学、课程和教育探究系的英语语言艺术助理教授,也是英语系的附属教员。他的研究主要集中在人文教育背景下的数字素养和新技术的关键方法,以及人们通过与数字媒体的接触来理解世界的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Journal of Research on Technology in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research on Technology in Education (JRTE) is a premier source for high-quality, peer-reviewed research that defines the state of the art, and future horizons, of teaching and learning with technology. The terms "education" and "technology" are broadly defined. Education is inclusive of formal educational environments ranging from PK-12 to higher education, and informal learning environments, such as museums, community centers, and after-school programs. Technology refers to both software and hardware innovations, and more broadly, the application of technological processes to education.
期刊最新文献
Culturally-sustaining and revitalizing computer science education for Indigenous students Computer science for English learners: supporting teacher learning and improved practice to engage multilinguals in AP computer science principles Micro: bit programming effects on elementary STEM teachers’ computational thinking and programming attitudes: a moderated mediation model Advancing culturally responsive-sustaining computer science through K-12 teacher professional development strategies Leading digital innovation in schools: the role of the open innovation mindset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1