Mind the gap: strategies for child protection in communities and organizations

Melissa D. Grady, Brooks Zitzmann, Cristina Alba, Shannon McNeil
{"title":"Mind the gap: strategies for child protection in communities and organizations","authors":"Melissa D. Grady, Brooks Zitzmann, Cristina Alba, Shannon McNeil","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2023.2264219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study reports on the findings of a symposium co-sponsored by blinded information focused on how to address child sexual abuse in communities and organizations. The focus of this study was on the participants’ perspectives regarding how individuals, organizations, and communities can prevent child sexual abuse. All those who attended were invited to participate in the study by responding to an online survey that included open-ended questions focused on barriers and promoters for decreasing child sexual abuse in the global community. In total, 76 respondents completed the survey and of those, 39 were from the United States, with the majority of the participants were female (n=52, 68%; males n = 24, 32%), with an average age of 51 (range = 23–86; median = 52). The constant comparison method of qualitative data analysis was used to identify the three major themes for barriers and strategies that emerged: Views of Society, Education/Increasing Awareness, and Systematic/Structural Changes. Each major theme was comprised of subthemes that provide additional details of the responses. Recommendations for primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary levels of prevention are discussed.KEYWORDS: Sexual abusesexual abuse preventionchild protectionsocial work organizations AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge the organizers of the Symposium and the students who assisted with this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":45302,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2023.2264219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study reports on the findings of a symposium co-sponsored by blinded information focused on how to address child sexual abuse in communities and organizations. The focus of this study was on the participants’ perspectives regarding how individuals, organizations, and communities can prevent child sexual abuse. All those who attended were invited to participate in the study by responding to an online survey that included open-ended questions focused on barriers and promoters for decreasing child sexual abuse in the global community. In total, 76 respondents completed the survey and of those, 39 were from the United States, with the majority of the participants were female (n=52, 68%; males n = 24, 32%), with an average age of 51 (range = 23–86; median = 52). The constant comparison method of qualitative data analysis was used to identify the three major themes for barriers and strategies that emerged: Views of Society, Education/Increasing Awareness, and Systematic/Structural Changes. Each major theme was comprised of subthemes that provide additional details of the responses. Recommendations for primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary levels of prevention are discussed.KEYWORDS: Sexual abusesexual abuse preventionchild protectionsocial work organizations AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge the organizers of the Symposium and the students who assisted with this project.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意差距:社区和组织的儿童保护战略
摘要本研究报告了blind information共同主办的关于如何解决社区和组织中的儿童性虐待问题的研讨会的结果。这项研究的重点是参与者对个人、组织和社区如何预防儿童性虐待的看法。所有参加的人都被邀请参加这项研究,通过回答一项在线调查,其中包括开放式问题,重点关注全球社区减少儿童性虐待的障碍和促进因素。总共有76名受访者完成了调查,其中39名来自美国,大多数参与者是女性(n= 52,68%;男性24例,占32%),平均年龄51岁(范围23-86岁;中位数= 52)。定性数据分析的持续比较方法用于确定出现的障碍和策略的三个主要主题:社会观,教育/提高意识和系统/结构变化。每个主要主题都由提供更多答复细节的次级主题组成。讨论了一级、二级、三级和四级预防的建议。关键词:性虐待;性虐待预防;儿童保护;社会工作组织感谢我们要感谢研讨会的组织者和协助这个项目的学生。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: In the Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, scholars, researchers, and practitioners examine issues of social justice and religion as they relate to the development of policy and delivery of social services. In addition to timely literature reviews, the journal presents up-to-date, in-depth, expert information on: sectarian and nonsectarian approaches to spirituality and ethics; justice and peace; philosophically oriented aspects of religion in the social services; conceptual frameworks; the philosophy of social work; and a great deal more.
期刊最新文献
Faith-based organizations and poverty alleviation: a scoping review on definitions and terminology (2010–2021) Mind the gap: strategies for child protection in communities and organizations Social work practice, religion, and faith: helping and harming; convergence and divergence “It’s not about imposing what I believe or what I value”: Social workers’ personal reflections on religion and spirituality and their influence on practice Leadership Wholeness, Volume 1 A Model of Spiritual Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1