Some Issues of Commenting Ivan Bunin’s Early Stories of 1887–1902

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213
Sergey N. Morozov
{"title":"Some Issues of Commenting Ivan Bunin’s Early Stories of 1887–1902","authors":"Sergey N. Morozov","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the principles and methods of commenting Ivan Bunin’s early fiction prose. It is pointed out that research into the type and level of completeness of scholarly commentaries on works of classics of Russian literature has been conducted for almost a century. The structure of the commentary in academic collections of Russian writers’ works is presented. The article offers a methodology of writing a commentary on the early literary prose of Ivan Bunin, while exploring the problems and questions that arise in the commentaries on the writer’s prose written for the future academic Complete Works and Letters by Ivan Bunin, the work on which has already begun. The principles of writing each section of the commentary for this scholarly edition of Bunin’s literary heritage are outlined: textual, historical-literary, and realhistorical ones. The latter section is presented in a more detailed structure of seven paragraphs. For each item, the paper provides several examples of commentary on specific realities from Bunin’s early stories. A separate section is devoted to linguistic commentary, for which several examples of commentary on particular regional words and folk expressions are also given. Thus, the commentary on Bunin’s prose should be comprehensive, combining with the greatest possible completeness all the necessary information about each work.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2023-8-3-194-213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the principles and methods of commenting Ivan Bunin’s early fiction prose. It is pointed out that research into the type and level of completeness of scholarly commentaries on works of classics of Russian literature has been conducted for almost a century. The structure of the commentary in academic collections of Russian writers’ works is presented. The article offers a methodology of writing a commentary on the early literary prose of Ivan Bunin, while exploring the problems and questions that arise in the commentaries on the writer’s prose written for the future academic Complete Works and Letters by Ivan Bunin, the work on which has already begun. The principles of writing each section of the commentary for this scholarly edition of Bunin’s literary heritage are outlined: textual, historical-literary, and realhistorical ones. The latter section is presented in a more detailed structure of seven paragraphs. For each item, the paper provides several examples of commentary on specific realities from Bunin’s early stories. A separate section is devoted to linguistic commentary, for which several examples of commentary on particular regional words and folk expressions are also given. Thus, the commentary on Bunin’s prose should be comprehensive, combining with the greatest possible completeness all the necessary information about each work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评伊万·布宁1887-1902年早期小说的几个问题
本文探讨了伊万·布宁早期小说散文的评论原则和方法。文章指出,对俄罗斯文学经典著作学术评注的类型和完整性水平的研究已经进行了近一个世纪。介绍了俄罗斯作家学术文集评注的结构。本文提出了一种对伊万·布宁早期文学散文进行评论的方法,同时探讨了为伊万·布宁的学术著作《全集》和《书信集》撰写的早期文学散文评论中出现的问题和问题。为这个学术版的布宁文学遗产撰写评论的每个部分的原则被概述:文本,历史文学和现实历史的。后一节以更详细的七段结构提出。对于每一个项目,论文提供了几个例子,从布宁的早期故事的具体现实的评论。一个单独的部分是专门的语言评论,其中几个例子,对特定的地方词和民间表达的评论也给出了。因此,对布宁散文的评论应该是全面的,尽可能完整地结合每一部作品的所有必要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Specific Features of Forming French-Language Literatures of Sub-Saharan Africa as the Regional Typological Commonness Esenin’s Poem “Us”: Materials for Historical and Literary Commentary Russian Chastushka (Ditties) vs Spanish Flamenco Verses: the Experience of Typological Comparison Genre and Style Structure of Expatriate Folklore Lyrics by Crimean Tatars (“The Song of Cool Water”) “Intertextuality” in the 12th Century: Marie de France and Chrétien de Troyes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1