Barbed Sutures: A Comprehensive Review of their Application in Medical

RCMOS Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.51473/ed.al.v3i2.635
João Zatt, Rafael Oliveira
{"title":"Barbed Sutures: A Comprehensive Review of their Application in Medical","authors":"João Zatt, Rafael Oliveira","doi":"10.51473/ed.al.v3i2.635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to analyze the use of barbed sutures in minimally invasive procedures, considering safety, efficiency, and reduction of surgical time. Methods: The analysis involved 43 articles selected from the PubMed electronic database, using the descriptors “Barbed sutures,” “Suture suspension,” and “Absorbable Knotless Barbed Suture.”. Results: Selected articles indicate that while the cost of barbed sutures slightly increases, the reduction in operating time potentially compensates for this, resulting in improved outcomes due to shorter anesthesia time. Barbed sutures reduced closure time by 32.8% compared to standard sutures. Unidirectional barbed sutures distribute soft tissues more effectively, preventing tissue slippage, leading to safer and more stable healing environments and less inflamed, thinner scars. Barbed sutures are valuable in rectus abdominis plication, particularly in abdominal wall fascia reinforcement post-TRAM flap removal for breast reconstruction or in conjunction with abdominoplasty. While not an official outcome, suture extrusion was 10% in the barbed suture group versus 20% in conventional sutures. Average complication rates were 9.7%, and surgical times averaged 108 minutes for breast augmentations and 156 minutes for abdominoplasties. Conclusion: The review found similar safety between barbed and conventional sutures. Barbed sutures offer enhanced tissue distribution, support, and aesthetic outcomes with lower inflammation risks. Data suggest improved complication rates, surgical time, and patient safety in breast reduction and panniculectomy. Barbed sutures are suitable for rectus abdominis plication, skin closure, and body contouring but not for arm regions due to prolonged foreign body response.","PeriodicalId":500592,"journal":{"name":"RCMOS","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RCMOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51473/ed.al.v3i2.635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the use of barbed sutures in minimally invasive procedures, considering safety, efficiency, and reduction of surgical time. Methods: The analysis involved 43 articles selected from the PubMed electronic database, using the descriptors “Barbed sutures,” “Suture suspension,” and “Absorbable Knotless Barbed Suture.”. Results: Selected articles indicate that while the cost of barbed sutures slightly increases, the reduction in operating time potentially compensates for this, resulting in improved outcomes due to shorter anesthesia time. Barbed sutures reduced closure time by 32.8% compared to standard sutures. Unidirectional barbed sutures distribute soft tissues more effectively, preventing tissue slippage, leading to safer and more stable healing environments and less inflamed, thinner scars. Barbed sutures are valuable in rectus abdominis plication, particularly in abdominal wall fascia reinforcement post-TRAM flap removal for breast reconstruction or in conjunction with abdominoplasty. While not an official outcome, suture extrusion was 10% in the barbed suture group versus 20% in conventional sutures. Average complication rates were 9.7%, and surgical times averaged 108 minutes for breast augmentations and 156 minutes for abdominoplasties. Conclusion: The review found similar safety between barbed and conventional sutures. Barbed sutures offer enhanced tissue distribution, support, and aesthetic outcomes with lower inflammation risks. Data suggest improved complication rates, surgical time, and patient safety in breast reduction and panniculectomy. Barbed sutures are suitable for rectus abdominis plication, skin closure, and body contouring but not for arm regions due to prolonged foreign body response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倒刺缝合线在医学上的应用综述
目的:从安全、高效和缩短手术时间的角度分析刺缝线在微创手术中的应用。方法:从PubMed电子数据库中选择43篇文章进行分析,描述词为“Barbed缝合线”、“Suture suspension”和“Absorbable Knotless Barbed Suture”。结果:所选文章表明,虽然倒钩缝合的成本略有增加,但手术时间的减少可能弥补了这一点,由于麻醉时间缩短,结果有所改善。与标准缝合相比,倒钩缝合缩短了32.8%的缝合时间。单向倒刺缝合线更有效地分布软组织,防止组织滑脱,导致更安全,更稳定的愈合环境和更少的炎症,更薄的疤痕。倒钩缝线在腹直肌应用中很有价值,特别是在tram皮瓣移除后腹壁筋膜加固用于乳房重建或与腹部成形术相结合。虽然不是官方结果,但倒钩缝合组的缝线挤压率为10%,而传统缝合组为20%。平均并发症发生率为9.7%,隆胸手术平均时间为108分钟,腹部整形手术平均时间为156分钟。结论:回顾发现有刺缝线与常规缝线的安全性相似。有刺缝合线增强了组织分布,支持和美观效果,降低了炎症风险。数据显示,在乳房缩小和乳头切除术中,并发症发生率、手术时间和患者安全性得到改善。倒钩缝合线适用于腹直肌应用,皮肤闭合和身体轮廓,但不适用于手臂区域,因为异物反应时间长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Barbed Sutures: A Comprehensive Review of their Application in Medical HÉRNIA DE AMYAND – UM ACHADO INCIDENTAL XANTOGRANULOMA JUVENIL: UMA RARIDADE DIFICULDADES DE COMUNICAÇÃO NO AUTISMO: Os desafios da inclusão do aluno autista A implantação de jogos como ferramenta de facilitação do processo de aprendizagem da matemática
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1