Testing the underlying structure of unfounded beliefs about COVID-19 around the world

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Thinking & Reasoning Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/13546783.2023.2259539
Paweł Brzóska, Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska, Jarosław Piotrowski, Bartłomiej Nowak, Peter K. Jonason, Constantine Sedikides, Mladen Adamovic, Kokou A. Atitsogbe, Oli Ahmed, Uzma Azam, Sergiu Bălțătescu, Konstantin Bochaver, Aidos Bolatov, Mario Bonato, Victor Counted, Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon, Jano Ramos-Diaz, Sonya Dragova-Koleva, Walaa Labib M. Eldesoki, Carla Sofia Esteves, Valdiney V. Gouveia, Pablo Perez de Leon, Dzintra Iliško, Jesus Alfonso D. Datu, Fanli Jia, Veljko Jovanović, Tomislav Jukić, Narine Khachatryan, Monika Kovacs, Uri Lifshin, Aitor Larzabal Fernandez, Kadi Liik, Sadia Malik, Chanki Moon, Stephan Muehlbacher, Reza Najafi, Emre Oruç, Joonha Park, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, Rahkman Ardi, Ognjen Ridic, Goran Ridic, Yadgar Ismail Said, Andrej Starc, Delia Stefenel, Kiều Thị Thanh Trà, Habib Tiliouine, Robert Tomšik, Jorge Torres-Marin, Charles S. Umeh, Eduardo Wills-Herrera, Anna Wlodarczyk, Zahir Vally, Illia Yahiiaiev
{"title":"Testing the underlying structure of unfounded beliefs about COVID-19 around the world","authors":"Paweł Brzóska, Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska, Jarosław Piotrowski, Bartłomiej Nowak, Peter K. Jonason, Constantine Sedikides, Mladen Adamovic, Kokou A. Atitsogbe, Oli Ahmed, Uzma Azam, Sergiu Bălțătescu, Konstantin Bochaver, Aidos Bolatov, Mario Bonato, Victor Counted, Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon, Jano Ramos-Diaz, Sonya Dragova-Koleva, Walaa Labib M. Eldesoki, Carla Sofia Esteves, Valdiney V. Gouveia, Pablo Perez de Leon, Dzintra Iliško, Jesus Alfonso D. Datu, Fanli Jia, Veljko Jovanović, Tomislav Jukić, Narine Khachatryan, Monika Kovacs, Uri Lifshin, Aitor Larzabal Fernandez, Kadi Liik, Sadia Malik, Chanki Moon, Stephan Muehlbacher, Reza Najafi, Emre Oruç, Joonha Park, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, Rahkman Ardi, Ognjen Ridic, Goran Ridic, Yadgar Ismail Said, Andrej Starc, Delia Stefenel, Kiều Thị Thanh Trà, Habib Tiliouine, Robert Tomšik, Jorge Torres-Marin, Charles S. Umeh, Eduardo Wills-Herrera, Anna Wlodarczyk, Zahir Vally, Illia Yahiiaiev","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2259539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractUnfounded—conspiracy and health—beliefs about COVID-19 have accompanied the pandemic worldwide. Here, we examined cross-nationally the structure and correlates of these beliefs with an 8-item scale, using a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. We obtained a two-factor model of unfounded (conspiracy and health) beliefs with good internal structure (average CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.04), but a high correlation between the two factors (average latent factor correlation = 0.57). This model was replicable across 50 countries (total N = 13,579), as evidenced by metric invariance between countries (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMS = 0.07) as well as scalar invariance across genders (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMS = 0.03) and educational levels (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMS = 0.03). Also, lower levels of education, more fear of COVID-19, and more cynicism were weakly associated with stronger conspiracy and health beliefs. The study contributes to knowledge about the structure of unfounded beliefs, and reveals the potential relevance of affective (i.e., fear of COVID-19) and cognitive (i.e., cynicism) factors along with demographics, in endorsing such beliefs. In summary, we obtained cross-cultural evidence for the distinctiveness of unfounded conspiracy and health beliefs about COVID-19 in terms of their structure and correlates.Keywords: Unfounded beliefsCOVID-19conspiracy beliefshealth beliefscross-cultural Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work of Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska and Jarosław Piotrowski was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland under Grant [2017/26/E/HS6/00282]. The work of Peter Jonason was partially supported by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange under Grant [PPN/ULM/2019/1/00019/U/00001] the National Science Centre of Poland under Grant [2019/35/B/HS6/00682]. The participation of Iva Poláčková Šolcová was supported by the National Plan of Recovery “Systemic Risk Institute” under Grant [LX22NPO5101], funded by European Union - Next Generation EU (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, EXCELES). The work of Narine Khachatryan was supported by the RA Science Committee, in the frames of the research project No. 20TTSH-070. In accordance with the national law of several countries, there were no direct collaboration between researchers from conflicting countries.","PeriodicalId":47270,"journal":{"name":"Thinking & Reasoning","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking & Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2023.2259539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AbstractUnfounded—conspiracy and health—beliefs about COVID-19 have accompanied the pandemic worldwide. Here, we examined cross-nationally the structure and correlates of these beliefs with an 8-item scale, using a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. We obtained a two-factor model of unfounded (conspiracy and health) beliefs with good internal structure (average CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.04), but a high correlation between the two factors (average latent factor correlation = 0.57). This model was replicable across 50 countries (total N = 13,579), as evidenced by metric invariance between countries (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMS = 0.07) as well as scalar invariance across genders (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMS = 0.03) and educational levels (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMS = 0.03). Also, lower levels of education, more fear of COVID-19, and more cynicism were weakly associated with stronger conspiracy and health beliefs. The study contributes to knowledge about the structure of unfounded beliefs, and reveals the potential relevance of affective (i.e., fear of COVID-19) and cognitive (i.e., cynicism) factors along with demographics, in endorsing such beliefs. In summary, we obtained cross-cultural evidence for the distinctiveness of unfounded conspiracy and health beliefs about COVID-19 in terms of their structure and correlates.Keywords: Unfounded beliefsCOVID-19conspiracy beliefshealth beliefscross-cultural Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work of Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska and Jarosław Piotrowski was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland under Grant [2017/26/E/HS6/00282]. The work of Peter Jonason was partially supported by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange under Grant [PPN/ULM/2019/1/00019/U/00001] the National Science Centre of Poland under Grant [2019/35/B/HS6/00682]. The participation of Iva Poláčková Šolcová was supported by the National Plan of Recovery “Systemic Risk Institute” under Grant [LX22NPO5101], funded by European Union - Next Generation EU (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, EXCELES). The work of Narine Khachatryan was supported by the RA Science Committee, in the frames of the research project No. 20TTSH-070. In accordance with the national law of several countries, there were no direct collaboration between researchers from conflicting countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验世界各地对COVID-19毫无根据的信念的基本结构
关于COVID-19的毫无根据的阴谋和健康信念伴随着全球范围内的大流行。在这里,我们使用多组验证性因素分析,用8项量表检查了这些信念的跨国结构和相关性。我们得到了一个内部结构良好的无根据(阴谋和健康)信念的双因素模型(平均CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.04),但两因素之间具有较高的相关性(平均潜在因素相关性= 0.57)。该模型可在50个国家(总N = 13,579)中复制,证明了国家之间的度量不变性(CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMS = 0.07),以及性别(CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMS = 0.03)和教育水平(CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMS = 0.03)的标量不变性。此外,较低的教育水平、对COVID-19的更多恐惧和更多的玩世不恭与更强的阴谋论和健康信念弱相关。该研究有助于了解毫无根据的信念的结构,并揭示了情感因素(即对COVID-19的恐惧)和认知因素(即犬儒主义)以及人口统计学因素与支持此类信念的潜在相关性。总之,我们获得了跨文化证据,证明关于COVID-19的毫无根据的阴谋和健康信念在其结构和相关性方面的独特性。关键词:毫无根据的信念scovid -19阴谋信念健康信念跨文化披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska和Jarosław Piotrowski的工作得到了波兰国家科学中心的资助[2017/26/E/HS6/00282]。Peter Jonason的工作得到了波兰国家学术交流局(PPN/ULM/2019/1/00019/U/00001)和波兰国家科学中心(2019/35/B/HS6/00682)的部分资助。Iva Poláčková Šolcová的参与得到了国家恢复计划“系统性风险研究所”的资助[LX22NPO5101],由欧盟-下一代欧盟(教育,青年和体育部,EXCELES)资助。Narine Khachatryan的工作得到了RA科学委员会的支持,在研究项目No. 20TTSH-070的框架内。根据一些国家的国内法,来自冲突国家的研究人员之间没有直接合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking & Reasoning
Thinking & Reasoning PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The skeptical import of motivated reasoning: a closer look at the evidence When word frequency meets word order: factors determining multiply-constrained creative association Mindset effects on the regulation of thinking time in problem-solving Elementary probabilistic operations: a framework for probabilistic reasoning Testing the underlying structure of unfounded beliefs about COVID-19 around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1