Deviasi Kontrak dalam Proyek Konstruksi: Sebuah Analisis Berbasis Temuan Audit Kinerja Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat

Publik Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.24036/jmiap.v5i3.898
Rahmat Fauzan, Benny Hidayat, Akhmad Suraji
{"title":"Deviasi Kontrak dalam Proyek Konstruksi: Sebuah Analisis Berbasis Temuan Audit Kinerja Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat","authors":"Rahmat Fauzan, Benny Hidayat, Akhmad Suraji","doi":"10.24036/jmiap.v5i3.898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the factors that contribute to deviations in the implementation of government construction projects through a case study approach in West Sumatra Province. This research is based on the primary secondary data, namely the West Sumatra Provincial Inspectorate Auditor Performance Audit Report from 2017 to 2021, totaling 15 (fifteen) Audit Reports (LHP). The findings of the inspection results are grouped into 3 (three) types of deviations based on the objectives of implementing a construction project, namely Cost, Quality, and Time. The results of the analysis show four dominant factors causing deviation. The first cause is contractor negligence, with a percentage of 16.13%, which highlights the problem of work implementation that is not by the contract. The second cause was negligence of the supervision consultant, with a rate of 11.29%. This included a lack of adequate supervision and producing reports that needed to reflect the actual conditions on the ground. Furthermore, the last two causes are the negligence of the Activity Technical Implementation Officer (PPTK) and the Commitment Making Officer (PPK), each with a rate of 29.03%. These two factors include problems in activity management and administration, as well as approval and payment processes that must be by the contract. Overall, the data indicates that administrative and managerial issues were the most dominant cause of deviations, at 58.06%.","PeriodicalId":33678,"journal":{"name":"Publik","volume":"2 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/jmiap.v5i3.898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates the factors that contribute to deviations in the implementation of government construction projects through a case study approach in West Sumatra Province. This research is based on the primary secondary data, namely the West Sumatra Provincial Inspectorate Auditor Performance Audit Report from 2017 to 2021, totaling 15 (fifteen) Audit Reports (LHP). The findings of the inspection results are grouped into 3 (three) types of deviations based on the objectives of implementing a construction project, namely Cost, Quality, and Time. The results of the analysis show four dominant factors causing deviation. The first cause is contractor negligence, with a percentage of 16.13%, which highlights the problem of work implementation that is not by the contract. The second cause was negligence of the supervision consultant, with a rate of 11.29%. This included a lack of adequate supervision and producing reports that needed to reflect the actual conditions on the ground. Furthermore, the last two causes are the negligence of the Activity Technical Implementation Officer (PPTK) and the Commitment Making Officer (PPK), each with a rate of 29.03%. These two factors include problems in activity management and administration, as well as approval and payment processes that must be by the contract. Overall, the data indicates that administrative and managerial issues were the most dominant cause of deviations, at 58.06%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
施工项目违约变迁:基于审计结果的分析结果,苏门答腊西部地区的绩效检查
本研究通过西苏门答腊省的个案研究方法,调查了导致政府建设项目实施偏差的因素。本研究基于主次数据,即西苏门答腊省督察审计员2017年至2021年的绩效审计报告,共15(15)份审计报告(LHP)。根据实施建设项目的目标,即成本、质量和时间,将检查结果的发现分为3(三)类偏差。分析结果表明,造成偏差的主要因素有四个。第一个原因是承包商的疏忽,占16.13%,突出的问题是没有按合同执行工作。其次是监理顾问的过失,占11.29%。这包括缺乏适当的监督和编写需要反映实地实际情况的报告。此外,最后两个原因是活动技术实施官员(PPTK)和承诺制定官员(PPK)的疏忽,各占29.03%。这两个因素包括活动管理和行政管理方面的问题,以及必须由合同规定的批准和支付流程。总体而言,数据表明行政和管理问题是造成偏差的最主要原因,占58.06%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efektivitas Ruang Publik Terpadu Ramah Anak (RPTRA) Deviasi Kontrak dalam Proyek Konstruksi: Sebuah Analisis Berbasis Temuan Audit Kinerja Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat Implementasi Program Urban Farming pada Kelompok Tani Subur Kedurus Kota Surabaya Penanganan Stunting di Provinsi Sumatera Barat dalam Perspektif Sound Governance "Garugiwa In Line" A Portrait of The Success of Local Wisdom-Based Population Administration Service Innovation in Ende District
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1