Elliott Anthony (2023) Algorithmic Intimacy. The Digital Revolution in Personal Relationships

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Science and Technology Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.23987/sts.126958
Paul Trauttmansdorff
{"title":"Elliott Anthony (2023) Algorithmic Intimacy. The Digital Revolution in Personal Relationships","authors":"Paul Trauttmansdorff","doi":"10.23987/sts.126958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic Intimacy, as Anthony Elliott claims, is not another contribution to the “soaring studies of the AI revolution” (2023: 1). Admittedly, this initial confession somehow strikes a chord as it has become increasingly difficult to keep track of such a prominent theme in the social sciences. A wide range of work in fields such as science and technology studies, sociology, political sciences, or communication studies now deals with the dangers, risks, benefits, or opportunities of different phenomena often subsumed under AI. The increasing attention to machine learning technologies in our everyday lives is not surprising—given the massive investments in AI by international corporations or the design of entire national strategies in which states project AI to build geopolitical futures (Bareis and Katzenbach, 2022). The difficulty of AI in public discourse lies in the combination of fuzziness, overuse, and its presumed technological power, which often clouds this notion with mystery or fear. The “Digital Revolution” is brimming with buzzwords; AI has long become its most prominent one. Algorithmic Intimacy carefully avoids any mysteries, but neither does it downplay the transformative potential of machine learning technologies. The book describes the recent proliferation of automated and predictive algorithms that mediate our intimate ways of being with others. It aims to carve out elements for a critical social theory of intimacy in our digitized life. How are social bonds and interactions experienced and negotiated in the human-machine interfaces that connect people? How do algorithmic technologies shape our longing or desires to build ties to and with others? It is a reasonable starting point to explore these questions with the book’s somewhat counterintuitive title—Algorithmic Intimacy, which challenges some common assumptions about the nature of algorithms and human togetherness. While social intimacy seems to evoke physical proximity, personal experience, and emotional encounters, algorithms, by contrast, appear concealed or invisible, virtual, and mechanistic. What are the implications of considering intimate social relationships “in the face of machine-learning predictive algorithms and the emergent variety of intimate connections modeled in the image of computational code” (Elliott, 2023: 12)? The book begins with two conceptually oriented chapters that lay out how algorithmic technology and automated platforms are transforming what sociologists once identified as the social cornerstones of intimate life: face-toface interaction, lasting togetherness, profound knowledge of one another, sometimes also confidentiality. Elliott then proceeds by examining three main domains in which intimacy is algorithmically reconfigured and which form the book’s main structure: “Relationship Tech,” “Therapy Tech,” and “Friendship Tech.” Each chapter presents several examples of how technological products shape the intimate feelings of togetherness and connection: erotic engineering app claiming to match suitable dates or optimize sexual activity;","PeriodicalId":45119,"journal":{"name":"Science and Technology Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.126958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithmic Intimacy, as Anthony Elliott claims, is not another contribution to the “soaring studies of the AI revolution” (2023: 1). Admittedly, this initial confession somehow strikes a chord as it has become increasingly difficult to keep track of such a prominent theme in the social sciences. A wide range of work in fields such as science and technology studies, sociology, political sciences, or communication studies now deals with the dangers, risks, benefits, or opportunities of different phenomena often subsumed under AI. The increasing attention to machine learning technologies in our everyday lives is not surprising—given the massive investments in AI by international corporations or the design of entire national strategies in which states project AI to build geopolitical futures (Bareis and Katzenbach, 2022). The difficulty of AI in public discourse lies in the combination of fuzziness, overuse, and its presumed technological power, which often clouds this notion with mystery or fear. The “Digital Revolution” is brimming with buzzwords; AI has long become its most prominent one. Algorithmic Intimacy carefully avoids any mysteries, but neither does it downplay the transformative potential of machine learning technologies. The book describes the recent proliferation of automated and predictive algorithms that mediate our intimate ways of being with others. It aims to carve out elements for a critical social theory of intimacy in our digitized life. How are social bonds and interactions experienced and negotiated in the human-machine interfaces that connect people? How do algorithmic technologies shape our longing or desires to build ties to and with others? It is a reasonable starting point to explore these questions with the book’s somewhat counterintuitive title—Algorithmic Intimacy, which challenges some common assumptions about the nature of algorithms and human togetherness. While social intimacy seems to evoke physical proximity, personal experience, and emotional encounters, algorithms, by contrast, appear concealed or invisible, virtual, and mechanistic. What are the implications of considering intimate social relationships “in the face of machine-learning predictive algorithms and the emergent variety of intimate connections modeled in the image of computational code” (Elliott, 2023: 12)? The book begins with two conceptually oriented chapters that lay out how algorithmic technology and automated platforms are transforming what sociologists once identified as the social cornerstones of intimate life: face-toface interaction, lasting togetherness, profound knowledge of one another, sometimes also confidentiality. Elliott then proceeds by examining three main domains in which intimacy is algorithmically reconfigured and which form the book’s main structure: “Relationship Tech,” “Therapy Tech,” and “Friendship Tech.” Each chapter presents several examples of how technological products shape the intimate feelings of togetherness and connection: erotic engineering app claiming to match suitable dates or optimize sexual activity;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾略特·安东尼(2023)算法亲密。人际关系中的数字革命
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science and Technology Studies
Science and Technology Studies HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Facilitating the Movement of Knowledge in Occupational Health Services Elliott Anthony (2023) Algorithmic Intimacy. The Digital Revolution in Personal Relationships West Darrel M and Allen John R (2020) Turning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence “Should We Stay or Should We Go now?” Knox Hannah (2020) Thinking Like a Climate: Governing a City in Times of Environmental Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1