Anxiety about the pandemic and trust in financial markets

IF 2.2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Annals of Regional Science Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1007/s00168-023-01243-0
Roy Cerqueti, Valerio Ficcadenti
{"title":"Anxiety about the pandemic and trust in financial markets","authors":"Roy Cerqueti, Valerio Ficcadenti","doi":"10.1007/s00168-023-01243-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a novel context of global financial distress. This paper enters the related scientific debate and focuses on the relationship between the anxiety felt by the population of a wide set of countries during the pandemic and the trust in the future performance of financial markets. Precisely, we move from the idea—grounded on some recent literature contributions—that the volume of Google searches about “coronavirus” can be considered as a proxy of anxiety and, jointly with the stock index prices, can be used to produce indicators of the population mood—in terms of pessimism and optimism—at country level. We analyse the “very high human developed countries” according to the Human Development Index plus China and the main stock market indexes associated with them. Namely, we propose both a time-dependent and a global indicator of pessimism and optimism and classify indexes and countries accordingly. The results show the existence of different clusters of countries and markets in terms of pessimism and optimism. Moreover, specific regimes emerge, with optimism increasing around the middle of June 2020. Furthermore, countries with different government responses to the pandemic have experienced different levels of mood indicators, so countries with less stringent lockdown measures had a higher level of optimism.","PeriodicalId":47951,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Regional Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-023-01243-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a novel context of global financial distress. This paper enters the related scientific debate and focuses on the relationship between the anxiety felt by the population of a wide set of countries during the pandemic and the trust in the future performance of financial markets. Precisely, we move from the idea—grounded on some recent literature contributions—that the volume of Google searches about “coronavirus” can be considered as a proxy of anxiety and, jointly with the stock index prices, can be used to produce indicators of the population mood—in terms of pessimism and optimism—at country level. We analyse the “very high human developed countries” according to the Human Development Index plus China and the main stock market indexes associated with them. Namely, we propose both a time-dependent and a global indicator of pessimism and optimism and classify indexes and countries accordingly. The results show the existence of different clusters of countries and markets in terms of pessimism and optimism. Moreover, specific regimes emerge, with optimism increasing around the middle of June 2020. Furthermore, countries with different government responses to the pandemic have experienced different levels of mood indicators, so countries with less stringent lockdown measures had a higher level of optimism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对疫情的焦虑和对金融市场的信任
2019冠状病毒病大流行引发了全球金融危机的新背景。本文进入了相关的科学辩论,并重点关注大流行期间许多国家的人口所感受到的焦虑与对金融市场未来表现的信任之间的关系。准确地说,我们从基于最近一些文献贡献的观点出发,即谷歌关于“冠状病毒”的搜索量可以被视为焦虑的代表,并与股票指数价格一起,可用于在国家层面上产生悲观和乐观的人口情绪指标。我们根据人类发展指数加上中国以及与之相关的主要股市指数来分析“非常高人类发达国家”。也就是说,我们提出了一个时间依赖和悲观和乐观的全球指标,并相应地对指数和国家进行分类。结果表明,在悲观和乐观两方面存在不同的国家和市场集群。此外,具体的制度出现了,乐观情绪在2020年6月中旬左右增加。此外,政府对疫情采取不同应对措施的国家情绪指标水平不同,因此封锁措施不那么严格的国家乐观程度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Annals of Regional Science presents high-quality research in the interdisciplinary field of regional and urban studies. The journal publishes papers which make a new or substantial contribution to the body of knowledge in which the spatial dimension plays a fundamental role, including regional economics, resource management, location theory, urban and regional planning, transportation and communication, population distribution and environmental quality. The Annals of Regional Science is the official journal of the Western Regional Science Association.
期刊最新文献
What makes German manufacturing plants move locations? Defining an ‘Epidemiological Risk Index’ to analyse COVID-19 mortality across European regions Estimation of impacts of volcanic ash fall from Mt. Fuji eruption on freight transport and effects of partial restoration of highways Regional decomposition in age-group unemployment dynamics in Germany Carbon tax vs. emission trading in a monopolistically competitive market with heterogeneous firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1