UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM IN THE CREATIVES OF THE REVOLUTION

Pavlo Vasylovych OBLAP
{"title":"UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM IN THE CREATIVES OF THE REVOLUTION","authors":"Pavlo Vasylovych OBLAP","doi":"10.15421/342315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the meaning of freedom in the context of the revolution, its interpretation by social philosophers of the second half of the 20th century (H.Arendt, H.Marcuse, E.Fromm, Y.Habermas and other scientists). It is emphasized that the struggle for freedom can be one of the factors of the beginning of revolutionary events, at the same time, revolutionary events can cause a new round of the struggle for freedom. Investigating the genesis of the concept of “revolution”, it is noted that in the political aspect, the origins of the revolution lie in the plane of “civil disorder” of the ancient polis. At the initial stage, there was an understanding of the revolution as a restoration, an attempt to find the absolute in the past, and a fear of founding something completely new. Based on the comparative characteristics of the French and American revolutions, it is noted that initially they were perceived by their participants primarily as an uprising against tyranny and oppression, as a return to the old just order. The revolutionary goals of the American and French revolutions were identical – freedom from domination. But unlike the French, the American revolution focused not on liberation, but on the establishment of a new republic, a new type of government. Thus, the French revolution was the revolution of the liberators, and the American revolution was the revolution of the founders. A key difference between the French and American revolutions was the assessment of freedom as the main goal of the revolution: the French revolution rose against a limited monarchy, the American revolution against an absolute one. The American Revolution was aimed at the formation of new institutions, a system of checks and balances, and the division of power into separate branches of government. The French Revolution almost immediately lost the public political space, personal “political freedom” was replaced by the “unified will of the people”, and the destruction of the old system did not lead to the proper formation of the new one. Despite the obvious success of the American revolution, it was the French revolution with all its problems and pitfalls that became the prototype of almost all revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries.","PeriodicalId":52840,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/342315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the meaning of freedom in the context of the revolution, its interpretation by social philosophers of the second half of the 20th century (H.Arendt, H.Marcuse, E.Fromm, Y.Habermas and other scientists). It is emphasized that the struggle for freedom can be one of the factors of the beginning of revolutionary events, at the same time, revolutionary events can cause a new round of the struggle for freedom. Investigating the genesis of the concept of “revolution”, it is noted that in the political aspect, the origins of the revolution lie in the plane of “civil disorder” of the ancient polis. At the initial stage, there was an understanding of the revolution as a restoration, an attempt to find the absolute in the past, and a fear of founding something completely new. Based on the comparative characteristics of the French and American revolutions, it is noted that initially they were perceived by their participants primarily as an uprising against tyranny and oppression, as a return to the old just order. The revolutionary goals of the American and French revolutions were identical – freedom from domination. But unlike the French, the American revolution focused not on liberation, but on the establishment of a new republic, a new type of government. Thus, the French revolution was the revolution of the liberators, and the American revolution was the revolution of the founders. A key difference between the French and American revolutions was the assessment of freedom as the main goal of the revolution: the French revolution rose against a limited monarchy, the American revolution against an absolute one. The American Revolution was aimed at the formation of new institutions, a system of checks and balances, and the division of power into separate branches of government. The French Revolution almost immediately lost the public political space, personal “political freedom” was replaced by the “unified will of the people”, and the destruction of the old system did not lead to the proper formation of the new one. Despite the obvious success of the American revolution, it was the French revolution with all its problems and pitfalls that became the prototype of almost all revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在革命的创造者中理解自由
本文考虑了自由在革命背景下的意义,以及20世纪下半叶的社会哲学家(阿伦特、马尔库塞、弗洛姆、哈贝马斯和其他科学家)对自由的解释。强调争取自由的斗争可以是革命事件开始的因素之一,同时,革命事件又可以引起新一轮的争取自由的斗争。考察“革命”概念的起源,在政治方面,革命的起源在于古代城邦的“内乱”层面。在最初阶段,人们把革命理解为一种复辟,试图在过去找到绝对的东西,害怕建立一种全新的东西。根据法国革命和美国革命的比较特点,我们注意到,最初它们被参与者认为主要是反对暴政和压迫的起义,是对旧的正义秩序的回归。美国革命和法国革命的革命目标是一致的——摆脱统治。但与法国不同的是,美国革命的重点不是解放,而是建立一个新的共和国,一种新型的政府。因此,法国革命是解放者的革命,而美国革命是开国者的革命。法国革命和美国革命的一个关键区别在于,他们把自由作为革命的主要目标:法国革命反对的是一个有限的君主制,而美国革命反对的是一个绝对的君主制。美国革命的目标是建立新的机构,建立一个相互制衡的体系,并将权力划分为不同的政府部门。法国大革命几乎立即失去了公共政治空间,个人的“政治自由”被“人民的统一意志”所取代,旧制度的破坏并没有导致新制度的适当形成。尽管美国革命取得了明显的成功,但法国革命及其所有问题和陷阱,却成为19世纪和20世纪几乎所有革命的原型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
FEATURES OF MEDIATIZATION OF THE SOCIO-POLITICAL SPHERE IN MODERN UKRAINIAN SOCIETY INNOVATIVE ANALYTICAL AND STATISTICAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING AND COUNTERACTING CORRUPTION PHILOSOPHY OF THE HEART: KAINONIA OF THE UKRAINIAN TRADITION UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM IN THE CREATIVES OF THE REVOLUTION ON THE CRISIS OF CULTURE AND MAN IN THE «FAR-FETCHED» TRADITIONALISM OF R.GUENON
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1