SYSTEMIC-CYBERNETIC AND SYNERGISTIC APPROACHES IN THE STUDY OF MODERN ELECTORAL ENGINEERING

Yuriy NIKOLENKO
{"title":"SYSTEMIC-CYBERNETIC AND SYNERGISTIC APPROACHES IN THE STUDY OF MODERN ELECTORAL ENGINEERING","authors":"Yuriy NIKOLENKO","doi":"10.15421/342314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the electoral engineering within the framework of systemic-cybernetic and synergetic scientific approaches. As a result of the study, it is concluded that the basis for consideration of the electoral engineering is the systemic-cybernetic approach, since the electoral sphere in its essence is a computational mechanism that, according to certain mathematical algorithms (electoral formula), translates the votes of electors (input data) into representative mandates (output data). Main components of the electoral engineering (the subject, the object and the process of the electoral engineering) can be fully considered within the framework of the systemic-cybernetic approach as a cybernetic system with the controlling and controlled components, where the management and feedback processes are running. The controlling component here is the subject of the electoral engineering (planning and carrying out of the electoral engineering activities), whereas the controlled component is the object of the electoral engineering (parameters of the electoral system and organization of the electoral process); management is the process of the electoral engineering itself. However, the electoral sphere is a constituent part of the political system, and it is possible to apply both the systemic-cybernetic approach and synergetic approach to its study. Therefore, application of the synergetic approach to the electoral engineering is possible only in an indirect way, i.e. through consideration of the political system in the context of synergetics (the electoral engineering in this case is considered as an activity within the political system). The bases for applying the synergetic approach to the electoral engineering carried out in practice are the following: 1) objectivist basis – the electoral engineering is carried out within the framework of a political system being a part of the social reality, and therefore cannot be fully modeled and predicted with the use of the systemic-cybernetic approach; 2) subjectivist basis – subjects engaged in the electoral engineering activities are political actors pursuing their own subjective goals and interests.","PeriodicalId":52840,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologichni doslidzhennia u filosofiyi sotsial''nikh i politichnikh naukakh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/342314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the electoral engineering within the framework of systemic-cybernetic and synergetic scientific approaches. As a result of the study, it is concluded that the basis for consideration of the electoral engineering is the systemic-cybernetic approach, since the electoral sphere in its essence is a computational mechanism that, according to certain mathematical algorithms (electoral formula), translates the votes of electors (input data) into representative mandates (output data). Main components of the electoral engineering (the subject, the object and the process of the electoral engineering) can be fully considered within the framework of the systemic-cybernetic approach as a cybernetic system with the controlling and controlled components, where the management and feedback processes are running. The controlling component here is the subject of the electoral engineering (planning and carrying out of the electoral engineering activities), whereas the controlled component is the object of the electoral engineering (parameters of the electoral system and organization of the electoral process); management is the process of the electoral engineering itself. However, the electoral sphere is a constituent part of the political system, and it is possible to apply both the systemic-cybernetic approach and synergetic approach to its study. Therefore, application of the synergetic approach to the electoral engineering is possible only in an indirect way, i.e. through consideration of the political system in the context of synergetics (the electoral engineering in this case is considered as an activity within the political system). The bases for applying the synergetic approach to the electoral engineering carried out in practice are the following: 1) objectivist basis – the electoral engineering is carried out within the framework of a political system being a part of the social reality, and therefore cannot be fully modeled and predicted with the use of the systemic-cybernetic approach; 2) subjectivist basis – subjects engaged in the electoral engineering activities are political actors pursuing their own subjective goals and interests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代选举工程研究中的系统控制论与协同方法
本文在系统控制论和协同科学方法的框架内考虑选举工程。研究的结果是,考虑选举工程的基础是系统控制论方法,因为选举领域本质上是一种计算机制,根据某些数学算法(选举公式),将选民的选票(输入数据)转化为代表性的授权(输出数据)。选举工程的主要组成部分(选举工程的主体、客体和过程)可以在系统控制论方法的框架内充分考虑,作为具有控制和被控制组件的控制论系统,其中管理和反馈过程正在运行。控制部分是选举工程的主体(选举工程活动的规划和实施),而控制部分是选举工程的对象(选举制度的参数和选举过程的组织);管理本身就是选举工程的过程。然而,选举领域是政治系统的一个组成部分,可以应用系统控制论方法和协同方法来研究它。因此,将协同方法应用于选举工程只能以一种间接的方式,即通过在协同作用的背景下考虑政治制度(在这种情况下,选举工程被认为是政治制度内的一种活动)。将协同方法应用于实践中的选举工程的基础如下:1)客观主义基础——选举工程是在政治制度的框架内进行的,是社会现实的一部分,因此不能用系统控制论方法完全建模和预测;2)主观主义基础——参与选举工程活动的主体是追求自身主观目标和利益的政治行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
FEATURES OF MEDIATIZATION OF THE SOCIO-POLITICAL SPHERE IN MODERN UKRAINIAN SOCIETY INNOVATIVE ANALYTICAL AND STATISTICAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A TOOL FOR MONITORING AND COUNTERACTING CORRUPTION PHILOSOPHY OF THE HEART: KAINONIA OF THE UKRAINIAN TRADITION UNDERSTANDING FREEDOM IN THE CREATIVES OF THE REVOLUTION ON THE CRISIS OF CULTURE AND MAN IN THE «FAR-FETCHED» TRADITIONALISM OF R.GUENON
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1