Teaching reflection in service-learning: disciplinary differences in conception and practice

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reflective Practice Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1080/14623943.2023.2264204
Rina Marie Camus, Grace Ngai, Kam Por Kwan, Ka Hing Lau, Stephen Chan
{"title":"Teaching reflection in service-learning: disciplinary differences in conception and practice","authors":"Rina Marie Camus, Grace Ngai, Kam Por Kwan, Ka Hing Lau, Stephen Chan","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2023.2264204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTFaculty from diverse disciplines are involved in teaching service-learning where reflection is an essential component. This qualitative study explores disciplinary differences in understanding reflection and use of reflective pedagogy. We interviewed faculty (N = 24) from 18 departments to examine differences in how they conceive and practice reflective pedagogy in service-learning courses. We found that disciplinary differences are a factor in how faculty conceive and practice reflection. Faculty from health and social care disciplines demonstrated an advantage compared to colleagues from other fields. Further, we found that how faculty conceive reflection is a factor in reflective practice. Conceptualizations of reflection, which are more student-referent or learner-focused, correlate with the more intense and effective practice of reflective pedagogy.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondisciplinary differencesservice-learninghealth & social carebusiness & humanitiesapplied sciences & engineering AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Sarah Chung and Eugene Cheung for their help with the interviews and data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We refer readers to Camus et al. (Citation2021) for details about the research process and findings of our earlier study.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Service-Learning and Leadership Office of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong University Grants Committee [Grant PolyU4/T&L/16–19].Notes on contributorsRina Marie CamusRina Marie Camus was Senior Service-Learning Officer at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. She is currently Senior Service-Learning Lead at the Centre for Innovative Service-Learning of Hong Kong Baptist University.Grace NgaiGrace Ngai is the head of the Service-Learning & Leadership Office and Associate Professor in the Department of Computing of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Kam Por KwanKam Por Kwan is a Professorial Project Fellow at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Ka Hing LauKa Hing Lau was Project Associate at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. He is currently Assistant Manager at the Centre for Innovative Service-Learning and the General Education Office of Hong Kong Baptist University.Stephen ChanStephen Chan was founding head and currently consultant at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2264204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTFaculty from diverse disciplines are involved in teaching service-learning where reflection is an essential component. This qualitative study explores disciplinary differences in understanding reflection and use of reflective pedagogy. We interviewed faculty (N = 24) from 18 departments to examine differences in how they conceive and practice reflective pedagogy in service-learning courses. We found that disciplinary differences are a factor in how faculty conceive and practice reflection. Faculty from health and social care disciplines demonstrated an advantage compared to colleagues from other fields. Further, we found that how faculty conceive reflection is a factor in reflective practice. Conceptualizations of reflection, which are more student-referent or learner-focused, correlate with the more intense and effective practice of reflective pedagogy.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondisciplinary differencesservice-learninghealth & social carebusiness & humanitiesapplied sciences & engineering AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Sarah Chung and Eugene Cheung for their help with the interviews and data collection.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. We refer readers to Camus et al. (Citation2021) for details about the research process and findings of our earlier study.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Service-Learning and Leadership Office of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong University Grants Committee [Grant PolyU4/T&L/16–19].Notes on contributorsRina Marie CamusRina Marie Camus was Senior Service-Learning Officer at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. She is currently Senior Service-Learning Lead at the Centre for Innovative Service-Learning of Hong Kong Baptist University.Grace NgaiGrace Ngai is the head of the Service-Learning & Leadership Office and Associate Professor in the Department of Computing of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Kam Por KwanKam Por Kwan is a Professorial Project Fellow at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Ka Hing LauKa Hing Lau was Project Associate at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. He is currently Assistant Manager at the Centre for Innovative Service-Learning and the General Education Office of Hong Kong Baptist University.Stephen ChanStephen Chan was founding head and currently consultant at the Service-Learning & Leadership Office of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务学习中的教学反思:概念与实践的学科差异
摘要不同学科的教师都参与了服务学习的教学,而反思是服务学习的重要组成部分。本质性研究探讨了理解反思和使用反思性教学法的学科差异。我们采访了来自18个系的教师(N = 24),以研究他们在服务学习课程中如何构思和实践反思性教学法的差异。我们发现,学科差异是教师如何构思和实践反思的一个因素。与来自其他领域的同事相比,来自健康和社会护理学科的教师表现出了优势。此外,我们发现教师如何理解反思是反思实践的一个因素。反思的概念更加以学生为中心或以学习者为中心,与反思性教学法的更强烈和更有效的实践相关联。关键词:反思、学科差异、服务学习、健康与社会关怀、商业与人文、应用科学与工程致谢我们要感谢Sarah Chung和Eugene Cheung在访谈和数据收集方面的帮助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。我们参考Camus et al. (Citation2021)了解我们早期研究的详细过程和发现。本研究得到香港理工大学教育资助委员会服务学习及领导办公室的支持[Grant poly4 /T&L/ 16-19]。作者简介rina Marie Camus rina Marie Camus是香港理工大学服务学习及领导办公室的高级服务学习主任。她现为香港浸会大学创新服务学习中心高级服务学习主任。Grace Ngai是香港理工大学服务学习及领导办公室主任,亦是香港理工大学计算机学系副教授。关锦宝是香港理工大学服务学习及领导力办公室的教授项目研究员。刘嘉兴(Ka Hing LauKa Hing Lau)是香港理工大学服务学习及领导力办公室的项目助理。他现为香港浸会大学创新服务学习中心及通识教育处助理经理。陈志强是香港理工大学服务学习及领导力办公室的创始主任及现任顾问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Doing cross-cultural interviews from Vietnamese students’ experience and reflective practice: lessons on intercultural communicative competence Reflection tools – support for patient learning in group education What does inclusion look like within an experiential teaching and assessing reflective learning model? Utilising authentic assessment to foster shared social membership Investigating the development of peer-led asynchronous digitally mediated feedback in higher education: three case studies On the journey from cognizance toward thriving: Iranian EFL teachers’ engagement in reflective practice and professional development: the mediating effect of teacher mindfulness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1