Varieties of STS: Luminosities, Creative Commons, and Open Curation

IF 1 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES Engaging Science Technology and Society Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.17351/ests2023.2273
Michael Fischer
{"title":"Varieties of STS: Luminosities, Creative Commons, and Open Curation","authors":"Michael Fischer","doi":"10.17351/ests2023.2273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four STS (science, technology and society) collectives (from Kenya, Turkey, Japan, and Ecuador) presented their archives and accounts of their collective work at two meetings of the Society for the Social Study of Science (4S) in Sydney 2018, and New Orleans 2019. These presentations are not only very interesting in themselves, but are housed on a digital platform (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography or PECE) that poses the question—and attempts to build a solution—of how ethnographic materials can be digitalized and made available for productive further activity. This text is a guiding summary for a set of further engagements published on PECE entitled: “Kenya: Techpreneur, Transnational Node, Kibera” (2023a), “Turkey. Inside and Outside the University” (2023b), “‘Japan’/Japan On Line: NatureCulture” (2023c), and “Ecuador: Thirdspaces amidst Social Conflict” (2023d), and “Bibliography for Varieties of STS” (2023e). These engagements help to ask: do long texts such as these four parts create need to be fragmented, tagged, and curated, into perhaps GPT-4 chunks, to be useful on new digital platforms such as PECE? Will this be required for next generation literacy of humans and machines alike, or more-than-human readers, analysts, and synthesizers?","PeriodicalId":44976,"journal":{"name":"Engaging Science Technology and Society","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engaging Science Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2023.2273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Four STS (science, technology and society) collectives (from Kenya, Turkey, Japan, and Ecuador) presented their archives and accounts of their collective work at two meetings of the Society for the Social Study of Science (4S) in Sydney 2018, and New Orleans 2019. These presentations are not only very interesting in themselves, but are housed on a digital platform (Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography or PECE) that poses the question—and attempts to build a solution—of how ethnographic materials can be digitalized and made available for productive further activity. This text is a guiding summary for a set of further engagements published on PECE entitled: “Kenya: Techpreneur, Transnational Node, Kibera” (2023a), “Turkey. Inside and Outside the University” (2023b), “‘Japan’/Japan On Line: NatureCulture” (2023c), and “Ecuador: Thirdspaces amidst Social Conflict” (2023d), and “Bibliography for Varieties of STS” (2023e). These engagements help to ask: do long texts such as these four parts create need to be fragmented, tagged, and curated, into perhaps GPT-4 chunks, to be useful on new digital platforms such as PECE? Will this be required for next generation literacy of humans and machines alike, or more-than-human readers, analysts, and synthesizers?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STS的种类:亮度、知识共享和开放策展
四个STS(科学、技术和社会)集体(来自肯尼亚、土耳其、日本和厄瓜多尔)在2018年悉尼和2019年新奥尔良举行的科学社会研究学会(4S)的两次会议上展示了他们的档案和集体工作记录。这些演讲不仅本身非常有趣,而且被安置在一个数字平台上(实验协作民族志平台或PECE),该平台提出了一个问题,并试图建立一个解决方案,即如何将民族志材料数字化,并使其可用于进一步的生产性活动。本文是在欧洲经委会上发表的题为“肯尼亚:技术企业家、跨国节点、基贝拉”(2023a)、“土耳其”的一系列进一步合作的指导性摘要。“大学内外”(2023b)、“日本”/“日本在线:自然文化”(2023c)、“厄瓜多尔:社会冲突中的第三空间”(2023d)、“STS品种参考书目”(2023e)。这些合作有助于提出这样一个问题:像这四个部分所创建的长文本是否需要被分割、标记和整理成GPT-4块,以便在PECE等新的数字平台上有用?下一代人类和机器的读写能力,或者超越人类的读者、分析者和合成器,是否需要这种能力?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.60%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Towards Transnational STS Varieties of STS: Luminosities, Creative Commons, and Open Curation Seabed in the Andes: Exploring “Splace” in Transnational STS Becoming an African Techpreneur: Geopolitics of Investments in “Local” Kenyan Entrepreneurship Placing STS in and through Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1