Immediate and long-term outcomes of the Scholars Committed to Opportunities in Psychological Education (SCOPE) Program

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH MENTORING & TUTORING Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/13611267.2023.2263394
Madison W. Silverstein, Yara Mekawi, Josephine Au, Ana Martinez de Andino, Cassidy Brydon, Melissa Miller, Kennedy Chatman
{"title":"Immediate and long-term outcomes of the Scholars Committed to Opportunities in Psychological Education (SCOPE) Program","authors":"Madison W. Silverstein, Yara Mekawi, Josephine Au, Ana Martinez de Andino, Cassidy Brydon, Melissa Miller, Kennedy Chatman","doi":"10.1080/13611267.2023.2263394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPersistent racial inequities in the field of psychology have resulted in exclusion and marginalization of racially/ethnically minoritized (REM) students. This manuscript discusses the effectiveness of an endeavor to increase admission, recruitment, and retention of REM students, the Scholars Committed to Opportunities in Psychological Education (SCOPE) Program. Study 1 examined the effectiveness of the second implementation of the virtual SCOPE program. Pre-post scores comparisons indicated decreases in perceived stress (d = .82), and increases in self-efficacy (d = .37), GRE knowledge (d = .81), application knowledge (d = .71), perceived application preparation (d = .85), and qualification (d = .53). Study 2 examined outcomes of previous SCOPE programs. Results indicated that the majority of participants were enrolled in a psychology graduate program. Results suggest that while SCOPE can benefit from curriculum modifications, there is initial evidence that SCOPE can make a significant impact in increasing equity in the field of psychology.KEYWORDS: Equitygraduate programsracially/ethnically minoritized students Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the American Psychological Association.","PeriodicalId":46613,"journal":{"name":"MENTORING & TUTORING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MENTORING & TUTORING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2023.2263394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTPersistent racial inequities in the field of psychology have resulted in exclusion and marginalization of racially/ethnically minoritized (REM) students. This manuscript discusses the effectiveness of an endeavor to increase admission, recruitment, and retention of REM students, the Scholars Committed to Opportunities in Psychological Education (SCOPE) Program. Study 1 examined the effectiveness of the second implementation of the virtual SCOPE program. Pre-post scores comparisons indicated decreases in perceived stress (d = .82), and increases in self-efficacy (d = .37), GRE knowledge (d = .81), application knowledge (d = .71), perceived application preparation (d = .85), and qualification (d = .53). Study 2 examined outcomes of previous SCOPE programs. Results indicated that the majority of participants were enrolled in a psychology graduate program. Results suggest that while SCOPE can benefit from curriculum modifications, there is initial evidence that SCOPE can make a significant impact in increasing equity in the field of psychology.KEYWORDS: Equitygraduate programsracially/ethnically minoritized students Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the American Psychological Association.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致力于心理教育机会的学者(SCOPE)项目的近期和长期成果
摘要心理学领域持续存在的种族不平等导致了对少数民族学生的排斥和边缘化。本文讨论了增加REM学生的录取、招募和保留的有效性,即心理教育机会学者(SCOPE)计划。研究1检验了虚拟SCOPE程序第二次实施的有效性。岗前得分比较显示,感知压力(d = 0.82)降低,自我效能感(d = 0.37)、GRE知识(d = 0.81)、申请知识(d = 0.71)、感知申请准备(d = 0.85)和资格(d = 0.53)增加。研究2检查了以前SCOPE项目的结果。结果表明,大多数参与者都参加了心理学研究生课程。结果表明,虽然SCOPE可以从课程修改中受益,但有初步证据表明,SCOPE可以在增加心理学领域的公平性方面产生重大影响。关键词:公平研究生项目少数族裔学生披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了美国心理学会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MENTORING & TUTORING
MENTORING & TUTORING EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Examining the perceptions of teacher candidates’ participating in a state-funded “Grow your own” initiative and exploring strategies that will retain them Freshmen’s intention to engage in faculty mentoring: applying the theory of planned behavior Editorial overview: mentoring throughout the process of professional practice Immediate and long-term outcomes of the Scholars Committed to Opportunities in Psychological Education (SCOPE) Program Tutors visualized through metaphorical narratives: a role unquestioned?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1