A.R. Lusi, F. Orte, R. Alonso Suárez, R. D’Elía, E. Wolfram
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE HELIOSAT-4 AND MCCLEAR MODELS FOR SOLAR GLOBALIRRADIATION ESTIMATE AT TWO SITES IN ARGENTINA","authors":"A.R. Lusi, F. Orte, R. Alonso Suárez, R. D’Elía, E. Wolfram","doi":"10.31527/analesafa.2023.34.3.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satellite-derived solar radiation information is necessary for assessing the financial risk of solar energy projects at arbitrary locations. These estimates must be evaluated against high-quality ground measurements to ensure the reliability of the information. In this work, 15-minute Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data from the Heliosat-4 model for all-sky conditions and the McClear model for clear-sky conditions were evaluated against ground-based measurements at two Saver-Net stations (http: //www.savernetsatreps.org): Pilar (Córdoba) and Villa Martelli (Buenos Aires). Clear sky detection of the measurements was done using the modified clarity index and analyzing the variability of consecutive measurements. A bias close to -5.5 % was found for the Heliosat-4 model at both sites and 1.15 % and -0.73 % for the MCClear model in Pilar and Villa Martelli, respectively. Furthermore, the relative root mean square error (rRMSD) was2 % and 20 % for the McClear and Heliosat-4 models, respectively at both sites.","PeriodicalId":41478,"journal":{"name":"Anales AFA","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales AFA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31527/analesafa.2023.34.3.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Satellite-derived solar radiation information is necessary for assessing the financial risk of solar energy projects at arbitrary locations. These estimates must be evaluated against high-quality ground measurements to ensure the reliability of the information. In this work, 15-minute Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data from the Heliosat-4 model for all-sky conditions and the McClear model for clear-sky conditions were evaluated against ground-based measurements at two Saver-Net stations (http: //www.savernetsatreps.org): Pilar (Córdoba) and Villa Martelli (Buenos Aires). Clear sky detection of the measurements was done using the modified clarity index and analyzing the variability of consecutive measurements. A bias close to -5.5 % was found for the Heliosat-4 model at both sites and 1.15 % and -0.73 % for the MCClear model in Pilar and Villa Martelli, respectively. Furthermore, the relative root mean square error (rRMSD) was2 % and 20 % for the McClear and Heliosat-4 models, respectively at both sites.