{"title":"Kick me while I’m down: Modeling employee differences of the impact of workplace incivility on employees' health and wellbeing","authors":"Frances Jorgensen , Adelle Bish , Karin Sanders , Phong Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Although research has shown that workplace incivility has a stronger and more enduring impact on the health and wellbeing of some employees more than others, there has been little focus on </span><em>why</em><span><span> this is the case. To address this gap, in this paper, we integrate attribution and conservation of resource<span> theories and relevant studies to develop a conceptual model that focuses on explaining the relationship between workplace incivility and employees' health and wellbeing. Our model emphasizes how employees' attributions about incivility are influenced by the combination of the perceived power of the source of the incivility, employees' individual resources, and the cultural value of collectivism of the country in which the employees were raised, and how their attributions may lead to a freeze response, resulting in a </span></span>downward spiral that impacts their health and wellbeing. Further, we consider the role of organizational resources in potentially mitigating the negative consequences of workplace incivility on these employees. By including an example of the model's application to equity-deserving employees and considering how employees' past experiences impact on the relationship between their attributions about workplace incivility and their health and wellbeing, our paper challenges underlying assumptions of human resource management (HRM) frameworks and models used to ensure employee wellbeing.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48145,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"Article 100999"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482223000529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although research has shown that workplace incivility has a stronger and more enduring impact on the health and wellbeing of some employees more than others, there has been little focus on why this is the case. To address this gap, in this paper, we integrate attribution and conservation of resource theories and relevant studies to develop a conceptual model that focuses on explaining the relationship between workplace incivility and employees' health and wellbeing. Our model emphasizes how employees' attributions about incivility are influenced by the combination of the perceived power of the source of the incivility, employees' individual resources, and the cultural value of collectivism of the country in which the employees were raised, and how their attributions may lead to a freeze response, resulting in a downward spiral that impacts their health and wellbeing. Further, we consider the role of organizational resources in potentially mitigating the negative consequences of workplace incivility on these employees. By including an example of the model's application to equity-deserving employees and considering how employees' past experiences impact on the relationship between their attributions about workplace incivility and their health and wellbeing, our paper challenges underlying assumptions of human resource management (HRM) frameworks and models used to ensure employee wellbeing.
期刊介绍:
The Human Resource Management Review (HRMR) is a quarterly academic journal dedicated to publishing scholarly conceptual and theoretical articles in the field of human resource management and related disciplines such as industrial/organizational psychology, human capital, labor relations, and organizational behavior. HRMR encourages manuscripts that address micro-, macro-, or multi-level phenomena concerning the function and processes of human resource management. The journal publishes articles that offer fresh insights to inspire future theory development and empirical research. Critical evaluations of existing concepts, theories, models, and frameworks are also encouraged, as well as quantitative meta-analytical reviews that contribute to conceptual and theoretical understanding.
Subject areas appropriate for HRMR include (but are not limited to) Strategic Human Resource Management, International Human Resource Management, the nature and role of the human resource function in organizations, any specific Human Resource function or activity (e.g., Job Analysis, Job Design, Workforce Planning, Recruitment, Selection and Placement, Performance and Talent Management, Reward Systems, Training, Development, Careers, Safety and Health, Diversity, Fairness, Discrimination, Employment Law, Employee Relations, Labor Relations, Workforce Metrics, HR Analytics, HRM and Technology, Social issues and HRM, Separation and Retention), topics that influence or are influenced by human resource management activities (e.g., Climate, Culture, Change, Leadership and Power, Groups and Teams, Employee Attitudes and Behavior, Individual, team, and/or Organizational Performance), and HRM Research Methods.