Acute respiratory tract viral infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: An observational study

Astha Singh, Satish Saluja, Arun Soni, Manoj Modi, Neelam Kler, Pankaj Garg, Anup Thakur
{"title":"Acute respiratory tract viral infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: An observational study","authors":"Astha Singh, Satish Saluja, Arun Soni, Manoj Modi, Neelam Kler, Pankaj Garg, Anup Thakur","doi":"10.4103/cmrp.cmrp_160_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Respiratory viral infection covers a significant admission in our Neonatal Intensive care unit. However due to limited diagnostic it is often underdiagnosed. Due to this, neonates are treated like bacterial infection, with unnecessary antibiotics and increased hospital stay. This also exposes other admitted neonates to the viral infection. Aim: The aim of our study is to determine the yield of respiratory BioFire in neonates presenting with respiratory symptoms. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2021 to March 2023 on neonates with respiratory symptoms. Respiratory BioFire panel was performed on nasopharyngeal specimens amongst infants with clinical suspicion of respiratory viral infection Result: During the 16-month study, amongst the 54 neonates for which respiratory BioFire was sent, 55% had positive results. 90% was community-acquired infection, whereas 10% was hospital-acquired infection. Cough and tachypnoea were the common presenting symptoms. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (60%) was the predominant virus detected. 88% of infants with RSV required respiratory support; out of which 2 out of 18(11%) required high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Amongst term and pre-term neonates, invasive ventilation was required in 7.7% and 41.2%, respectively, amongst the tested positive, only 13% had blood culture positive, due to which antibiotics were never started in 50% and amongst those in which antibiotics were started stopped before 72 h in 40% neonates. It was seen in our study that most (88.6%) of the virus detected were in the winter months (August–January). Conclusion: Acute viral infections are common amongst neonates admitted with respiratory symptoms. Early recognition can rationalise management and reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":72736,"journal":{"name":"Current medicine research and practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medicine research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cmrp.cmrp_160_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Respiratory viral infection covers a significant admission in our Neonatal Intensive care unit. However due to limited diagnostic it is often underdiagnosed. Due to this, neonates are treated like bacterial infection, with unnecessary antibiotics and increased hospital stay. This also exposes other admitted neonates to the viral infection. Aim: The aim of our study is to determine the yield of respiratory BioFire in neonates presenting with respiratory symptoms. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2021 to March 2023 on neonates with respiratory symptoms. Respiratory BioFire panel was performed on nasopharyngeal specimens amongst infants with clinical suspicion of respiratory viral infection Result: During the 16-month study, amongst the 54 neonates for which respiratory BioFire was sent, 55% had positive results. 90% was community-acquired infection, whereas 10% was hospital-acquired infection. Cough and tachypnoea were the common presenting symptoms. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (60%) was the predominant virus detected. 88% of infants with RSV required respiratory support; out of which 2 out of 18(11%) required high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Amongst term and pre-term neonates, invasive ventilation was required in 7.7% and 41.2%, respectively, amongst the tested positive, only 13% had blood culture positive, due to which antibiotics were never started in 50% and amongst those in which antibiotics were started stopped before 72 h in 40% neonates. It was seen in our study that most (88.6%) of the virus detected were in the winter months (August–January). Conclusion: Acute viral infections are common amongst neonates admitted with respiratory symptoms. Early recognition can rationalise management and reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护室急性呼吸道病毒感染:一项观察性研究
背景:呼吸道病毒感染是我们新生儿重症监护室的一个重要入院病例。然而,由于诊断有限,往往诊断不足。因此,新生儿被当作细菌感染来对待,使用不必要的抗生素,住院时间也增加了。这也使其他入院的新生儿暴露于病毒感染。目的:本研究的目的是确定出现呼吸道症状的新生儿呼吸系统BioFire的产率。材料与方法:于2021年1月至2023年3月对有呼吸道症状的新生儿进行回顾性观察性研究。结果:在为期16个月的研究中,54例使用呼吸系统BioFire的新生儿中,55%的新生儿结果呈阳性。90%为社区获得性感染,10%为医院获得性感染。咳嗽、呼吸急促是常见的临床表现。呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)为优势病毒(60%)。88%的呼吸道合胞病毒患儿需要呼吸支持;其中2 / 18(11%)需要高频振荡通气。在足月和早产儿中,需要有创通气的分别为7.7%和41.2%,在检测阳性的新生儿中,只有13%的血培养阳性,50%的新生儿从未开始使用抗生素,在使用抗生素的新生儿中,40%的新生儿在72小时前停止使用抗生素。在我们的研究中发现,大多数(88.6%)的病毒检测发生在冬季月份(8 - 1月)。结论:急性病毒感染在有呼吸道症状的新生儿中很常见。早期识别可以使管理合理化并减少不必要的抗生素使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computerised tomography brain findings in male patients with alcohol dependence syndrome: A hospital based cross sectional study Emotional intelligence and personality among undergraduate students in a rural district of South India Overview of the artificial intelligence roadmap: Future applications in brain research Rare cause of red eyes: Cogan's syndrome An intriguing case of episodic hypersomnolence- Kleine–Levin syndrome, a diagnosis often missed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1