{"title":"THE VISION OF STYLE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE LITERARY GRAMMAR DISCOURSE","authors":"V. V. Liubetska","doi":"10.18524/2414-0627.2023.30.283859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the proposed article, we turn to one of the directions in modern academic theory of literature – literary grammar, which examines the literary text in the linguistic dimension. The purpose of the research is to indicate the features of this discourse and explain what the vision of style is within the limits of literary grammar. The object of research is the discourse of literary grammar; the subject of research is style in literary grammar. The following methods were used to realize research goal: information analysis method, synthesis method, descriptive method. Literary grammar, which strives for accuracy and specificity, is constituted on the border with linguistics. Signs and features of style are recognized in literary grammar as the construction of an artistic work, the scheme by which it is built. It motivates the certain «signs» of style appearance. The author of the article concludes that the concept of style within the limits of literary grammar is pre-aesthetic, as it reduces the sensual, as the internal form of plastic-painting component of the image. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to clarify the multiplicity of style concepts in their originality in modern literary theory and modern linguistics. The concept of «style» refers to one of the fundamental features of artistic creativity, which, firstly, determines the aesthetic value of a work and without which the emergence of artistic systems (literary schools, currents, trends) is impossible. There are different understandings of style. Some literary critics expand the meaning of this concept, bring it closer to the artistic method (I. F Volkov, O. V. Mykhaylov, P. O. Nikolaev, B. G. Reizov), while others, on the contrary, identify it with the writer’s individual handwriting concept (I. Kleiner, I. Yu. Podgaetska, P. M. Sakulin, L. Spitzer). Literary grammar objectifies the external form of the work, therefore it is distinguished by the interpretation of inner-textual relations depth. However, it cannot claim conclusions of an aesthetic or ontological nature. Elements of the external form of the work in this discourse are considered in isolation from its internal form and content. Literary grammar does not set itself the task of revealing the style of an artistic work as a unity of all moments of artistic form and content but helps to reveal the specificity one of the essential style components – the language of a literary and artistic work. The perspective of further research is to reveal the semantic content of the style category within the limits of various theoretical and literary discourses.","PeriodicalId":33930,"journal":{"name":"Zapiski z ukrayins''kogo movoznavstva","volume":"90 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zapiski z ukrayins''kogo movoznavstva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2414-0627.2023.30.283859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the proposed article, we turn to one of the directions in modern academic theory of literature – literary grammar, which examines the literary text in the linguistic dimension. The purpose of the research is to indicate the features of this discourse and explain what the vision of style is within the limits of literary grammar. The object of research is the discourse of literary grammar; the subject of research is style in literary grammar. The following methods were used to realize research goal: information analysis method, synthesis method, descriptive method. Literary grammar, which strives for accuracy and specificity, is constituted on the border with linguistics. Signs and features of style are recognized in literary grammar as the construction of an artistic work, the scheme by which it is built. It motivates the certain «signs» of style appearance. The author of the article concludes that the concept of style within the limits of literary grammar is pre-aesthetic, as it reduces the sensual, as the internal form of plastic-painting component of the image. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to clarify the multiplicity of style concepts in their originality in modern literary theory and modern linguistics. The concept of «style» refers to one of the fundamental features of artistic creativity, which, firstly, determines the aesthetic value of a work and without which the emergence of artistic systems (literary schools, currents, trends) is impossible. There are different understandings of style. Some literary critics expand the meaning of this concept, bring it closer to the artistic method (I. F Volkov, O. V. Mykhaylov, P. O. Nikolaev, B. G. Reizov), while others, on the contrary, identify it with the writer’s individual handwriting concept (I. Kleiner, I. Yu. Podgaetska, P. M. Sakulin, L. Spitzer). Literary grammar objectifies the external form of the work, therefore it is distinguished by the interpretation of inner-textual relations depth. However, it cannot claim conclusions of an aesthetic or ontological nature. Elements of the external form of the work in this discourse are considered in isolation from its internal form and content. Literary grammar does not set itself the task of revealing the style of an artistic work as a unity of all moments of artistic form and content but helps to reveal the specificity one of the essential style components – the language of a literary and artistic work. The perspective of further research is to reveal the semantic content of the style category within the limits of various theoretical and literary discourses.
在本文中,我们转向现代文学学术理论的一个方向——文学语法,它从语言学的维度来审视文学文本。研究的目的是指出这一话语的特征,并解释在文学语法的范围内,风格的视野是什么。研究对象是文学语法话语;研究的主题是文学语法中的文体。为实现研究目标,采用了信息分析法、综合法、描述法。文学语法是在语言学的边缘上构成的,它力求精确和专一。在文学语法中,风格的标志和特征被认为是艺术作品的结构,是艺术作品构建的方案。它激发了风格外观的某些“标志”。作者认为,文学语法范围内的风格概念是前美学的,因为它减少了感性,作为形象的塑画成分的内部形式。该研究的相关性是由澄清现代文论和现代语言学中风格概念的多样性所决定的。“风格”的概念是指艺术创造力的基本特征之一,首先,它决定了作品的审美价值,没有它,艺术系统(文学流派、流派、趋势)就不可能出现。对风格有不同的理解。一些文学评论家扩大了这一概念的含义,使其更接近艺术方法(I. F Volkov, O. V. Mykhaylov, P. O. Nikolaev, B. G. Reizov),而另一些人则相反,将其等同于作家的个人笔迹概念(I. Kleiner, I. Yu)。P. M. Sakulin, L. Spitzer)。文学语法对作品的外在形式进行客观化,因此其特点在于对内在文本关系深度的阐释。然而,它不能主张美学或本体论性质的结论。在这一论述中,作品的外部形式的要素与其内部形式和内容是分开考虑的。文学语法的任务不是揭示艺术作品的风格是艺术形式和内容的统一,而是帮助揭示艺术作品的基本风格组成部分之一-语言的特殊性。进一步研究的视角是在各种理论和文学话语的范围内揭示风格范畴的语义内容。